HOME | DD

Quantum808 — Constitution Class Cruiser (24th C.) [Subclass]

#startrek #startrekstarship
Published: 2018-01-30 21:12:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 1187; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 23
Redirect to original
Description

Constitution Class NEX-Refit (Kearsarge Subclass)


Concived alongside a general refitting under Project NEX, Starfleet announced the relaunch of the Constitution Class. as such they were required for them to be of the same standard as a Soverigen Class Assault Cruiser. So the ships had new beam arrays fitted and modified torpedoe bays capable of firing a volley of Quantum Torpedoes. All newer connies ran either their original 4-digit registery or they ran the newer 6-digit registry; over 107 were built along with 177 of it's sub-class.

Some if not all of the new Constitution Classes retained their original saucer sections, as it flowed better with the design of the ship.

The Kearsarge Subclass is the name given to the 177 other NEX Constitution Classes, they were outfitted to be more Soverigen than the original NEX Connies. The Subclasses namesake, the USS Kearsarge, NCC-1721-D was introduced alongside the NEX-Constitution Class, USS Constitution, NCX-1700-E.


Inspired by -

Original Ship parts - ,   and myself

Made - ME


[UPDATE: Fixed the hull plating colours on the saucer, and added the Soverigen Deflector]

Related content
Comments: 31

KaiserShipyards [2018-01-31 05:45:15 +0000 UTC]

Sweet

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JNSDF-Kozuke [2018-01-30 22:06:15 +0000 UTC]

Nice, but the numbers don't have the ',' in them, it's just 1717, or 1701.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to JNSDF-Kozuke [2018-01-30 22:11:45 +0000 UTC]

it's the numbers built, not the registry. it's to comemorate Enterprise and Yorktown so the newer connes the first ones only 1,701 were built then a subclass was built and 1,717 were built also.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JNSDF-Kozuke In reply to Quantum808 [2018-01-30 22:12:39 +0000 UTC]

Oh, okay, just seeing the numbers threw me off. And uh, not sure if the caps was really necessary...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to JNSDF-Kozuke [2018-01-30 22:14:37 +0000 UTC]

yea. i do that to get a point across quick.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JNSDF-Kozuke In reply to Quantum808 [2018-01-30 22:15:57 +0000 UTC]

Save it for those that argue about something. It's really unnecessary to pull caps out on the first response.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to JNSDF-Kozuke [2018-01-30 22:17:36 +0000 UTC]

k. besides you like it?

also, my first comment has be de-capitalised.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JNSDF-Kozuke In reply to Quantum808 [2018-01-30 22:18:23 +0000 UTC]

Nice connie. Wish there were a multi-view of those nacelles. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to JNSDF-Kozuke [2018-01-30 22:19:49 +0000 UTC]

yea. i'll have to wait for the othro of the soverigen class to do it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JNSDF-Kozuke In reply to Quantum808 [2018-01-30 22:24:14 +0000 UTC]

k, Kaiser should have started with the Galaxy Ortho at the beginning of this month.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

KaiserShipyards In reply to JNSDF-Kozuke [2018-01-31 05:46:49 +0000 UTC]

but sadly cus of work i havent and im far behind on stuff I might have to set up a cash prize event for someone else to do it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JNSDF-Kozuke In reply to KaiserShipyards [2018-01-31 05:48:28 +0000 UTC]

That is a shame.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaiserShipyards In reply to JNSDF-Kozuke [2018-01-31 11:24:53 +0000 UTC]

yeah =/

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Quantum808 In reply to JNSDF-Kozuke [2018-01-30 22:25:52 +0000 UTC]

i hope he has because then the Galaxy-X can get it's othro aswell.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JNSDF-Kozuke In reply to Quantum808 [2018-01-30 22:26:47 +0000 UTC]

That would be simple, just place a Nacelle over where the neck would be, and add the phaser cannons.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to JNSDF-Kozuke [2018-01-30 22:28:42 +0000 UTC]

yea, thats the easiest one along with the Soverigen-X.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JNSDF-Kozuke In reply to Quantum808 [2018-01-30 22:29:44 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, just remember who came up with the Sovereign-X though. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to JNSDF-Kozuke [2018-01-30 22:32:50 +0000 UTC]

yea, you. even though mine was made originally in 2016.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JNSDF-Kozuke In reply to Quantum808 [2018-01-30 22:34:19 +0000 UTC]

Well, maybe yours is like a subclass? 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to JNSDF-Kozuke [2018-01-30 22:37:04 +0000 UTC]

yea, i think mine is as it differ with the third nacelle pylon placement and increased warp power & weapon power exceeding the main Sorverigen-X.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JNSDF-Kozuke In reply to Quantum808 [2018-01-30 22:38:29 +0000 UTC]

Erm, I beg to differ with the weapon power as my Sovereign-X has the spinal lance.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to JNSDF-Kozuke [2018-01-31 14:48:21 +0000 UTC]

yea, except no captain would divert all power from the weapon powr to make the lance even more powerful.
U.S.S. Zenterprise-E (Dreadnought) < remember this? that's my soverigen-x as the dreadnought Zenterprise-E.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JNSDF-Kozuke In reply to Quantum808 [2018-01-31 16:35:04 +0000 UTC]

Yes I remember you making that with the lance after I made my Sovereign-X.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to JNSDF-Kozuke [2018-01-31 17:53:48 +0000 UTC]

yea as the original had a different lance on it, then it got up-to-date when you posted your Soverigen-X.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gundam1701 [2018-01-30 21:21:39 +0000 UTC]

Looks like the Excalibur-class from Star Trek Online

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to Gundam1701 [2018-01-30 21:26:07 +0000 UTC]

sort-of but i was aiming to try and keep her as connie as possible, and yes i know what ship you are talking about, i proberly modifed a connie with just will the Excalibur Nacelles on her on the PC.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nichodo [2018-01-30 21:13:51 +0000 UTC]

Nice upgrade for the Connie

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to nichodo [2018-01-30 21:17:17 +0000 UTC]

yea, remember the 25th Century Highwind-A i did for you, the hull i used came of this.

also, she could be a possible addition to your connie evolution.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nichodo In reply to Quantum808 [2018-01-30 21:18:16 +0000 UTC]

ah okay.

she could be before the Exeter class came out

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to nichodo [2018-01-30 21:26:24 +0000 UTC]

yea, i say so.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nichodo In reply to Quantum808 [2018-01-30 21:28:46 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0