HOME | DD
Rabbi-Tom — Red Shetland
#horse #isis #mare #pony #red_shetland #belgiumbrussels #brusselsattacks
Published: 2016-03-23 02:16:00 +0000 UTC; Views: 1057; Favourites: 18; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Today, 3-22-2016, ISIS once again proved themselfs utter fuckwads of humanity with their brutal attacks in Brussels. I was thinking more of an editorial cartoon, but the last one I did, it seemed to raise more hackles and I'm in a testy mood currently. Because we have a Commander in Chief who , after 7 plus years still refuses to call it radical Islamics doing the shit to humanity, but instead called them the JV team.ISIS is nothing but butchers, a rabid animal that needs to be destroyed.
Related content
Comments: 15
While the Book of Revelations might describe to some people as the literal end of the world, I had just thought a large-scale war that span the Middle East and Europe. My reckoning of this comes from the fact that later books within the New Testament might have written in Israel and/or Southern Europe at the time of their writing (The Americas was not discovered by then). Here, Revelations mentions three antichrists which might corrupt the world. Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union might have been the first two which we, the Western world, have pushed and defeated successfully. The third antichrist is where ISIS comes in (Revelations 16:12 might come to mind). Their actions have the descriptions mentioned in the text of Revelations e.g. beheading anyone whom doesn't follow them (Revelations 20:4). About the Lake of Fire in Revelations, I assume today might be napalm, explosives or nukes. Regarding ISIS, they might also try to kill as many jews as possible as well as Christians; so naturally they might fight against Israel. Long story short, the war against ISIS which we have to win might as well be the final battle that the Bible talks about. Even though it might be a theory, let me know what you think if you want to weigh in.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I stand with the red mare and brussels.
Sad to say but I don't see this ending. Not as long as there are people who follow the word of the Koran. Yes I have read it. IsIs follows it to the letter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The middle east is like a hydra of terrorism- cut off one head, many more appear. With every Islamic faction we vow to destroy, a new one fills their void, that's just the way of it. Which means the only solution is to either glass that entire hemisphere, or leave them the hell alone and focus on defending ourselves here at home. Honestly I don't see much point in fighting for freedom over there, when our fascist leaders won't even give us the right to defend ourselves on our own land.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Calling the things like that will only feed their anger. Just sayin'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's what they want to be called, It's what they are, do you really think they care what you call them? Their message is very clear: submit to sharia law or die. Europe showed them mercy, gave them the benefit of the doubt, and this is how they were repaid.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Calling them ISIS only gives legitimacy to what they do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sooo... if we called them something different like the Cotton Candy Crusaders, they wouldn't be as violent?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You are totally missing the point
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't see how. You said that calling them things (terrorists I presume) only fuels their anger, which implies that you believe that if we call them something different, they will show less wrath. Where has this proven to work before? Has anyone from isis ever stepped up and said "if you don't call us terrorists we won't bomb so many cities"?
I get that you're just being passive about it, I want to be too. I want everyone to stop pouring war and money into that land helping terrorists to kill other terrorists, but the truth is that isis wants blood, they've said it already. They take pride in war and killing for power.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I hope Europe will remember that it has a proud tradition of beating the @!#~@$ out of Jihadi murderers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I appreciate the sentiments of the shirt.
But about the political part you bring up, what difference would it make calling them "radical Islamics"? How would that change foreign policy at all?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Because he refuses to acknowledge that there is a serious problem with radical fanatical islamics, instead apologises to them for what the Christians did during the crusades centuries ago. He needs to embrace the moderates in Islam and encourage them to get the radical imams shut down.
Right after San Bernadino, he flat out ignored the fact that the couple were radicalised and made it more of a gun control issue.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I get where you're coming from. The important part, I think, is appealing to the moderates rather than seeming to condemn the entire religion and its adherents. But that's the thing about terrorist attacks like this. They are designed to strike terror into people and get them to operate out of fear rather than thinking things out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
