HOME | DD

Ralph1989 β€” Marines Lightning

Published: 2015-09-18 10:47:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 5996; Favourites: 188; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description

Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II is a STOVL (Short Take-off/Vertical Landing) fifth generation multirole jet fighter, developed from Joint Strike Fighter program for United States Marine Corps (USMC), Royal Air Force (RAF) and Royal Navy aviation as a successor of McDonnell Douglas/BAE Systems AV-8B Harrier II V/STOL ground-attack/reconnaissance aircraft.

First squadron of USMC reached initial operational capability status on 31st August 2015. Ten aircraft from Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 121 (VMFA-121) β€žGreen Knights” are operating from Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, Arizona and are expected to deploy to United States Forces Japan soon.

Related content
Comments: 52

SolGravionMegazord [2024-02-19 15:08:25 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

airbus213 [2020-10-07 16:11:17 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to airbus213 [2020-10-08 05:39:57 +0000 UTC]

white drawing block A4 format with density 240 grams per square meter.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

4-X-S [2017-12-03 00:40:33 +0000 UTC]

Is this how money looks like?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to 4-X-S [2017-12-03 14:03:19 +0000 UTC]

Muscular thing look like

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Ralph1989 [2017-12-06 03:36:29 +0000 UTC]

I hope gen6 are not as expansive. F35 and J20 their design are very appealing and futuristic, yet they look like flying brick.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to 4-X-S [2017-12-06 09:30:25 +0000 UTC]

6-generation is for now on drawing board or computers in design offices ;]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Ralph1989 [2017-12-10 16:22:42 +0000 UTC]

I predict gen5 is the final gen for this platform, the thing is already over invested, there should be a new disrupting tech coming soon.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to 4-X-S [2017-12-10 17:20:22 +0000 UTC]

Maybe unmanned one, like Northrop Grumman's visualization: youtu.be/cITKk-DqYWE

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Ralph1989 [2017-12-13 04:58:40 +0000 UTC]

Lookheed is overrated XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to 4-X-S [2017-12-13 15:20:17 +0000 UTC]

nope

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FeshMaroll [2016-01-12 04:59:33 +0000 UTC]

What a lovely looking bird!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to FeshMaroll [2016-01-12 06:33:40 +0000 UTC]

thx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WilB-J [2015-12-05 02:02:49 +0000 UTC]

amazing.wow

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to WilB-J [2015-12-05 05:17:48 +0000 UTC]

thx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

spinosaurus1 [2015-11-21 01:00:36 +0000 UTC]

i can't process how amazing this looks lovely rendition of this aircraft

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to spinosaurus1 [2015-11-21 04:58:49 +0000 UTC]

thx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

warrior1944 [2015-10-18 14:00:24 +0000 UTC]

Amazing drawing there of this airplane, still remains to see when all of the versions are operational and how it will perform, but your drawing of it makes it look deadly and great

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to warrior1944 [2015-10-19 04:01:16 +0000 UTC]

thx man!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sketchh22 [2015-10-14 08:02:48 +0000 UTC]

I literally said "wow" when I saw this. Your work (especially your shading) has improved so much over the years. You are rapidly turning into one of the top military pencil artists on DA. Keep it up!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to Sketchh22 [2015-10-14 10:42:17 +0000 UTC]

Hello. I'm honored that great military artist noticed my pencil works! I'm your fan since I joined to dA in 2011. Thank you so much and greetings from Poland!

P.S. I'm waiting for your new stuff!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Sketchh22 In reply to Ralph1989 [2015-10-18 03:34:51 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. I'm glad there are those that enjoy my work! As a fellow artist I'm sure you can relate to how much time and effort we spend making our work as detailed and realistic as possible. And I have a few drawings in the works that I promise I will post as soon as they're done. I'm very busy plus I am a perfectionist which is why they take so long to finish!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to Sketchh22 [2015-10-18 04:31:34 +0000 UTC]

No problem! And I can't wait!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SpectreLN [2015-10-13 13:26:00 +0000 UTC]

Niemal jak biaΕ‚oczarne zdjΔ™cie Robisz siΔ™ coraz lepszy

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to SpectreLN [2015-10-14 03:59:43 +0000 UTC]

dziΔ™ki!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mann-of-LaMancha [2015-10-06 14:41:15 +0000 UTC]

exceptional

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to Mann-of-LaMancha [2015-10-06 14:55:13 +0000 UTC]

;]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EbolaSparkleBear [2015-09-27 17:26:51 +0000 UTC]

Awesome art!

I hope the F35 program doesn't end up being a colossal bust.
It's a shame the F 22 program was shut down by special interests and dopes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to EbolaSparkleBear [2015-09-28 05:18:58 +0000 UTC]

thx!

F-35 program is different one than Raptor's, because it's de facto three aircraft for different tasks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

EbolaSparkleBear In reply to Ralph1989 [2015-09-28 05:40:34 +0000 UTC]

I know, but the F22 is in demand while the F35 is still mired in issues/controversy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to EbolaSparkleBear [2015-09-28 06:16:49 +0000 UTC]

F-35 is more progressive and there's a lot of "childhood diseases", because of greater amount of new technologies.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LastEmperor220796 [2015-09-19 15:37:12 +0000 UTC]

This is awesome !!!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to LastEmperor220796 [2015-09-19 16:58:15 +0000 UTC]

thx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

artistzak [2015-09-18 18:33:22 +0000 UTC]

epic drawing of the f-35b.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to artistzak [2015-09-19 04:10:03 +0000 UTC]

thx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HYPPthe [2015-09-18 17:55:57 +0000 UTC]

Wow! The details are simply breathtaking! Awesome work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to HYPPthe [2015-09-19 04:10:11 +0000 UTC]

thx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Midway2009 [2015-09-18 16:49:17 +0000 UTC]

Nice view!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to Midway2009 [2015-09-19 04:10:17 +0000 UTC]

thx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Midway2009 In reply to Ralph1989 [2015-09-19 17:57:39 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BenMMiller [2015-09-18 16:32:54 +0000 UTC]

Most importantly, outstanding job. What size canvas is this?

Otherwise, F-35s won't be deploying to the Pacific until 2017 at the earliest. Mainly due to the fact that the USMC rigged the IOC certification and gave it the green light purely for PR purposes. As it stands right now, the B can't even participate in even the most basic of combat scenarios and readiness rates are so terrible that they can't even fly enough to train their pilots adequately. Maybe someday it'll be a great aircraft, but no time soon.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to BenMMiller [2015-09-19 04:13:10 +0000 UTC]

Thx, it's a A4 format.

I basing on the official USMC's information.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

homicidal45 [2015-09-18 12:56:19 +0000 UTC]

Possibly the most broken aircraft in history..
But, I am bias, I have a huge love for the Harrier, and dislike this over priced pile of Company led rubbish, that a 30 year old jet can out fly..
I know it looks cool but cool don't cut it in the 'real' world..
Here in the UK, our Carriers (New) are about ready, the aircraft (these) are now not! They were meant to be..
Now, moving on.. Please..
As a piece of art, it excellent and must be said a super angle, well done..
Rob

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to homicidal45 [2015-09-18 13:03:18 +0000 UTC]

we'll see in the near future what will happen with them, but I wish good luck to RAF and Royal Navy with entering the service =]

Thx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

homicidal45 In reply to Ralph1989 [2015-09-18 13:10:47 +0000 UTC]

We will indeed.. Thank you mate, as I say I am very bias.. I grew up on and around Harriers.. And believe our Government sold out..
But enough.. Thanks for replying..
Rob

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ralph1989 In reply to homicidal45 [2015-09-18 13:14:43 +0000 UTC]

I know your feelings. Harriers are very good British invention, but time of every aircraft's glory ends...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dan-S-T [2015-09-18 11:12:38 +0000 UTC]

Let me ask something.

There are 3 versions in the F-35 family, A, B, C, how come the B and C versions don't get the on-board gun like the A version?

I looked at the wing sizes once, are the B versions wings shorter and stubbier than the other versions?

When it gets none stealthy loads are wingtip pylons optional?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Kenkwasi In reply to Dan-S-T [2015-09-18 22:34:31 +0000 UTC]

I believe it is because the B version has to accommodate the massive lift fan behind the cockpit, probably wouldn't be enough space for an internal cannon and it's ammo. Though they are capable of carrying an center-line gun pod on the outside:
Β i.imgur.com/mQ03ji8.jpg

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Dan-S-T In reply to Kenkwasi [2015-09-18 22:43:36 +0000 UTC]

And the C version lacks internal cannon too but for what reason?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kenkwasi In reply to Dan-S-T [2015-09-19 00:11:38 +0000 UTC]

I guess I should've mentioned that in my first reply
I have no clear idea to be honest, even after a few minutes of research
The Navy apparently gave up on the internal cannon, not sure as to why. Maybe in favor for a bigger internal fuel load for better range. They could use the pod anyways if the mission requires it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>