Comments: 14
RayJones In reply to ForeverKnight [2007-01-07 15:04:42 +0000 UTC]
This is the most recent page - the previous ones may be seen at
[link]
Hope to have more pages out soon!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ForeverKnight In reply to RayJones [2007-01-08 23:29:34 +0000 UTC]
Thanks hun! I cant wait to read it. *bookmarks the page*
-Rebekah
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ratsmith [2006-12-26 10:23:06 +0000 UTC]
Is this before or after Monty and Jalapena hook up?
I am of course assuming that that is Jalapena as the Waitress.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RayJones In reply to Ratsmith [2007-01-07 15:08:58 +0000 UTC]
It's kind of an alternate history-loop inside my work. I want my g-rated work like DoomGadget to ultimately be seen as a precursor to what happens in my naughty work - a continuous story. But in the naughty stuff, Jalapena works as a stripper, and I can't have that in the g-rated part. So on the g- side of the divide, she's a waitress and she & Monty are just getting together.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ratsmith In reply to RayJones [2007-01-07 16:53:15 +0000 UTC]
I can't see why she can't be both. A few of the strippers I've talked to in the past had more than one job. Many had children to support.
Just goes to show that you can't judge a person based on one aspect of their lives.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
RayJones In reply to Ratsmith [2007-01-08 14:25:32 +0000 UTC]
Obviously, she could, at different times, or doing both (or even working in a topless restaurant). But some of the folks over at the Cafe are very sensitive to any suggestion of naughtiness, and I wanted something I could present as "family friendly".
It's been a while, but yes some strippers are supporting themselves and families or paying for school. I don't think there is anything shameful in it at all - this particular work is just targeted for a more general audience.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RayJones In reply to Ratsmith [2007-01-08 14:23:20 +0000 UTC]
Obviously, she could, at different times, or doing both (or even working in a topless restaurant). But some of the folks over at the Cafe are very sensitive to any suggestion of naughtiness, and I wanted something I could present as "family friendly".
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RayJones In reply to Dynamoe [2006-12-22 04:58:26 +0000 UTC]
Thanks - I'll try not to disappoint!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MisterNick [2006-12-21 19:30:41 +0000 UTC]
Awaits weirdness. The bat-girl (Foxy)? looks a tad disapproving
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RayJones In reply to MisterNick [2006-12-22 04:58:56 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm, I hadn't noticed that. I suppose she'd be concerned about what her 'munk eats....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RayJones In reply to Dragonrider1227 [2006-12-22 04:59:18 +0000 UTC]
Thank you - if nothing else, I can promise it will be strange...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0