HOME | DD

Redundant-Cat — Cover Image for 'Ghost Ships'

Published: 2017-04-08 23:25:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 2239; Favourites: 38; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Description Cover image for StarFoxFan11 's story  Ghost Ships

The ships may or may not be recognizable, I'm not sure if its better to leave them unnamed for narrative reasons, at least for now, but I will say that they are all somewhat more famous among WWII ships. (Yes there are three of said ship in the back if you can identify it from the silhouette)

_____
As a side note, this will probably be the last cover image I do just due to them being a combination of very time consuming while being both too open ended while simultaneously being too constricting (if that makes sense). That and that it took way longer than it should have for this request to actually be completed because of those reasons >.>

It could be better but I need more practice in drawing vehicles digitally, alas one of a multitude of things I need to improve on...
Related content
Comments: 23

Scattergunsniper [2017-04-24 02:03:40 +0000 UTC]

Iowa, Bismarck, Enterprise and Yamato.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to Scattergunsniper [2017-04-24 13:31:23 +0000 UTC]

Close, but just slightly off~

South Dakota, Prinz Eugen, Saratoga, and Yamato

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scattergunsniper In reply to Redundant-Cat [2017-04-24 13:44:22 +0000 UTC]

Damn. Still' those are amazing ship with proud histories. Also there us a 5th ship in the background and the 3 shadows. Those shadows kinda looks like 3 of the 4 Kongo sister ships. I say 3 cuz im pretty sure the Hiei had a different style of bridge tower

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to Scattergunsniper [2017-04-25 00:32:07 +0000 UTC]

Ah, the three shadows are the Yamato class, the left shadow is Nagato (not as distinctive as the Yamato class so a bit harder to tell)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scattergunsniper In reply to Redundant-Cat [2017-04-25 00:41:56 +0000 UTC]

The Yamatos? As in Yamato, Musashi and Shinano?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to Scattergunsniper [2017-04-25 01:01:16 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, the description had all three in battleship form so that was how I drew them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scattergunsniper In reply to Redundant-Cat [2017-04-25 01:01:52 +0000 UTC]

Neat.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StarFoxFan11 In reply to Scattergunsniper [2017-04-26 01:55:55 +0000 UTC]

The writer has many plans, but shall reveal no secrets!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scattergunsniper In reply to StarFoxFan11 [2017-04-26 02:35:53 +0000 UTC]

I shall discover them! By any means necessary!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StarFoxFan11 In reply to Scattergunsniper [2017-04-26 03:01:58 +0000 UTC]

You may try, but ye shall fail.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Scattergunsniper In reply to StarFoxFan11 [2017-04-26 03:03:26 +0000 UTC]

I am not deterred!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StarFoxFan11 In reply to Scattergunsniper [2017-04-26 03:05:28 +0000 UTC]

Then let the games begin.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

amirrrrruuuddddddiin [2017-04-09 03:50:53 +0000 UTC]

Is that Montana in the foreground?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Redundant-Cat In reply to amirrrrruuuddddddiin [2017-04-09 06:29:05 +0000 UTC]

It is South Dakota, though admittedly its a bit stubbier than it should be. Though, the American fast battleships tend to look very similar from the front.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

amirrrrruuuddddddiin In reply to Redundant-Cat [2017-04-09 12:27:01 +0000 UTC]

Well South Dakota, when compared to the rest of the American fast battleships looks quite wide but that is mainly due to how short it is compared to the North Carolina and Iowa class.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

StarFoxFan11 In reply to amirrrrruuuddddddiin [2017-04-09 03:52:41 +0000 UTC]

No Montana here!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

amirrrrruuuddddddiin In reply to StarFoxFan11 [2017-04-09 12:27:13 +0000 UTC]

I know that now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TealGuardian [2017-04-09 00:49:41 +0000 UTC]

Looks great!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to TealGuardian [2017-04-09 03:49:25 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SBB-67Montana [2017-04-08 23:27:18 +0000 UTC]

I can see that they're the three Yamato sisters. Surprised that the third one isn't in her carrier conversion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to SBB-67Montana [2017-04-08 23:44:39 +0000 UTC]

Yeah part of the original description was to have all three as battleships, rather than including the carrier upgrade. Don't know much more than that otherwise.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SBB-67Montana In reply to Redundant-Cat [2017-04-09 00:10:18 +0000 UTC]

Ah, I see. Still, looks great.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

StarFoxFan11 In reply to Redundant-Cat [2017-04-09 00:00:47 +0000 UTC]

It's a secret!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0