Comments: 23
moepi92 [2011-07-20 08:36:23 +0000 UTC]
Wow. Vor allem das rechte hat recht viele Details, die beim linkin noch fehlen, z.Bsp. beim Ring. Aber ich verbeuge mich vor allen, die so mit Buntstiften umgehen kΓΆnnen. Was fΓΌr Buntstifte hast du denn benutzt? Und was fΓΌr Papier?
π: 0 β©: 1
Reinhard1 In reply to moepi92 [2011-07-23 21:41:12 +0000 UTC]
Danke und Du hast vollkommen Recht, aber als ich dieses Bild zeichnete, 'wehrte' es sich gegen weitere Bleistiftstriche. Es ist komisch, aber ab dem Moment, in dem das Bild nicht mehr zu mir spricht, kann ich einfach nicht weiter machen. Dann muss es bleiben, wie es ist. Artistic license? Ich weiss es nicht. Es ist nur ganz einfach so bei mir.
Das Papier war, wenn ich mich recht entsinne, Fabriano Artistico. Die Bleistifte sind Polychromos.
Und danke fΓΌr die netten Worte.
π: 0 β©: 0
Reinhard1 In reply to Jess-Ko [2011-02-13 12:11:09 +0000 UTC]
Jessica, many thanks, really. This was my first coloured pencil piece and I was interested to see if it were possible to draw realistically with them. To a degree it seemed to turn out ok. I did not develop the colour part further since it was more or less a proof of concept idea and I was more interested in the 'anxiety' topic. What I found out is that it takes a lot of time to create deep and convincing values with cp. AND it takes a lot of time to learn and understand colour theory. (Complementary colours especially). Unfortunately Faber Castell does not have a colour wheel to find the real compliments so I needed to experiment a lot. And layers, layers, layers, ......... What helped me is that I am drawing with circles in graphite and this is what is really needed with cp. Otherwise you won't achieve any deep colour.
π: 0 β©: 1
Reinhard1 In reply to Jess-Ko [2011-02-13 20:29:11 +0000 UTC]
Jessica, don't waste your talent on cheap material. As they say: Draw like a millionnaire. If a drawing turns out great, it will be mounted and you will be reminded for a looooooooooooong time that you should have used better material. Buy the best material you can afford, paper and pencils (colour pencils) in graphite the pencil is far less important in my experience. Paper will always, colour and graphite, be an important factor. In cp the best is only good enough.
The reason why the majority of dArtists use Prismas is simple. Prismas are available and affordable all over the United States. Polychromos not that much. Prismas here in Germany are very hard to get by, plus, and that is an absolute stopper for me, Prismacolor pencils will give you a waxy shine (they are wax based) and that is not what I am out for. Secondly, it is reported that they break easily and being hard to get, this is another stumbling block. Thirdly, they are softer and will not hold the tip for very long in contrast to Polychromos. Prismas are easier to blend and give you a faster, shinier result - as far as I can tell - but for my personal taste - being the realist I am - it is a tad too 'airbrushed' for me.
Should you want to experiment more with Polychromos, I suggest you get a very good sharpener. I have an electric sharpener (for roughly 80 β¬ -- gulp) but it gives me anice, sharp, long tip. There is always Christmas and birthday.
Last point. Do you know of Boesner in Preungesheim? I can only recommend.
π: 0 β©: 1
Reinhard1 In reply to Jess-Ko [2011-02-13 21:04:15 +0000 UTC]
Jessica, I agree with you whole-heartedly. Boesner is, as we'd say in German 'eine Schlangengrube'. Speaking of paper. Try Arches, hot press, watercolor paper or Fabriano Artistico. For Arches you can get samples at Boesener. You might as well give the matboard pieces they sell for little money at the cash register, a try. This is what I am drawing my 'Life's Lines' on.
π: 0 β©: 1
Reinhard1 In reply to Jess-Ko [2011-02-13 21:37:00 +0000 UTC]
Jessica, I have sxperimented with Bristol Board but I did not like it. Too smooth for my taste. I don't use chamois, tissue paper, tortillons, etc. for blending but harder lead over softer lead, this board is not for me.
Watercolour paper comes in varying degrees of smootheness. The classical, rough paper (cold pressed . rahter grainy) or the smoother (hot pressed - less grainy to rather smooth). I prefer hot pressed since it is smooth enough. This paper will accept many layers of graphite (I rather add layers vs pressing and hence avoid much of the graphite shine) and is tough enough to withstand erasing. Go to the paper department at Boesners and open some of the drawers with the paper and feel over the finish to see what suits you best. Paper is, in my experience at least, a very personal decision and requires some experimenting. And as I said, ask the people there the paper department to give sou some samples of the papers or simply take you some out of the dispensers there. I know that Arches has samples of hot press paper there and 'play around' with it. That is what I did. Most of all, have fun! Btw, do you draw with wooden pencils or mechanical ones? I draw with mechanical (.3mm; .5mm; .7mm and 2mm). With the exception of the 2mm they don't need sharpening. Great time saver for me.
π: 0 β©: 1
Reinhard1 In reply to Jess-Ko [2011-02-13 23:00:20 +0000 UTC]
Jessica, give it a try and show us what you drew. I am sure it will be interesting and very good.
π: 0 β©: 0
Reinhard1 In reply to SDA-MessengersOracle [2011-01-27 14:16:16 +0000 UTC]
It is Polychromos by Faber-Castell, colored pencils. Thanks so much for the kind words.
π: 0 β©: 1
Reinhard1 In reply to SDA-MessengersOracle [2011-01-29 23:05:17 +0000 UTC]
It was one of my very first experimenting with this medium and I am not sure whether it carries the same fascination as graphite does. A friend of mine once compared my b&w drawings with cp and he preferred b&w because the coloured one looked too much like photos. Not that I claim that my colour work would merit this conclusion.
π: 0 β©: 0
Reinhard1 In reply to Abglanz [2011-01-17 23:21:35 +0000 UTC]
Vielen Dank. Ich habe dieses Bild auf viel zu rauhem Aquarewllpapier gezeichent und es sollte eigentlich nie so weit ausgearbeitet werden. Ich hatte es nur in meine Galerie gestellt, um meine 'Denke' zu zeigen. Vielleicht nehme ich die Idee 'Anxiety' noch einaml auf und sehe was sich, auch mit diesem Motiv (meine Tochter) in der Umsetzung sonst noch so machen lieΓe.
π: 0 β©: 0
Shelfcloud [2011-01-03 20:43:02 +0000 UTC]
It's good to see your older works here too!! I think your gallery is rather impressive.
π: 0 β©: 1
Reinhard1 In reply to Shelfcloud [2011-01-04 12:46:06 +0000 UTC]
Mike, thanks. The idea was simply to show what I did and where I came from. To a degree as well it seves for me as a reminder to pick up these older ideas again and see how I would fare with it today.
π: 0 β©: 1
Shelfcloud In reply to Reinhard1 [2011-01-04 18:15:42 +0000 UTC]
Yes, that would be a nice comparison.
π: 0 β©: 1
Reinhard1 In reply to Shelfcloud [2011-01-05 00:22:31 +0000 UTC]
Mike, all I can give is a definete 'maybe'. I still have too many ideas floating around in my head that I would like to try first.
π: 0 β©: 1