HOME | DD
requin789 β E-100
Published: 2013-09-01 22:20:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 929; Favourites: 18; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
I did the Maus ! So why not the E-100 ?More light and fast that the maus ...
And armed with the 150mm ! ....
It's the only one heavy who can make 800 Damage per shot !
This thing was my first tier 10 ...
Sadly the penatration ( 235mm penatration ) is obviously too weak ...
So everybody shoot with gold ammo with this tank ...
But i understand ... bounce on a tiger II with a Tier 10 is a shame ...
Related content
Comments: 13
The E-100 is the second best heavy tank after IS-7, I think.
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm probably just going to stop at the E-75 because I just can't handle the prospect of every other tier IX or X tank defeating the only consolation I would have of tough armour with gold.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yep now have a tier 10 with a heavy armor is useless ....
Everybody shoot with gold ammo , it's better to have a Β medium t10 now .....
i regret the good old E-100 and the good old Maus
π: 0 β©: 1
And let's wait the update with tanks on warthunder c:
π: 0 β©: 1
we will see if Wot will be destroyed or not :dΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
I strongly doubt that. Each game is unique in its own right and has their own enormous fanbases.
π: 0 β©: 1
yep but a lot of player are asking at Wargaming to change a lot of things ...
They still didn't do anything about that ...
π: 0 β©: 1
I have my issues with WN in some of their practices. At the same time I reckon that quite a large amount of the things that players complain about are to do with them not knowing how something works and what it takes to change it. People can have their opinions but not everything that an individual sees in a game or its developers is going to be changed or even looked at because its only promoted by a few players. As I implied earlier, I'm going to be enjoying both games as they are unique and remarkably fun in their own way. If you want War Thunder over WoT then that is your right to your opinion. Other than that have fun and enjoy your day.
π: 0 β©: 1
i already know this ...
but what i'm talking about is not only for a " few players "...... i'm talking about the engine of the game itself ....
i read a lot of post on the wot forum ... A lot of people asking for a remake of the engine , if you don't know Wot use a lot of ressources ... really more that it should use ..
So a lot of player play the game with 15fps ... (a computer (2010-11) , in normal graphic) should read wot at 25fps or more ...
That a big problem for a lot of player , who don't have probebly the money Β to buy a new computer ....
They only do things for make come players ... i understand !
But now it's Β probebly the time for fix things ....
I'm talking about things that all the Ouest europe community are complaining , probebly the est europe too ...
i think , Wot have enought money and time for make it fast ...
....
And for now "Warthunder" is know like the candidat against "World of tank/World of warplanes" ...
1 game who started with planes , and will add with ground units ....
and another one who started with Β tanks , and now with planes ....
we will see :d
π: 0 β©: 1
I agree on that note though as I'm on the SEA server and its appropriate forums, I have not heard of such complaints. That said, improving the engine would not be big ask. However, WN is focused primarily with WoWP which doesn't help.
π: 0 β©: 1
Something that i don't understand ... they always have a game with problems ...
And they want a second .... but probebly i have wrong and it World of warplanes gonna be awesome ..
i so a live from the gamecom and it's not so awesome X3
π: 0 β©: 0