Comments: 25
vasix [2014-11-30 04:10:49 +0000 UTC]
Other than the dinosaurs, what of things like Cronopio, Priosphenodon and Araripesuchus? Aren't they also supposed to have lived at this time, Candeleros Formation? Buitreraptor? In any case it's a lovely image
π: 0 β©: 0
bLAZZE92 [2014-01-31 20:08:37 +0000 UTC]
Ekrixinatosaurus was no where near that big.
π: 0 β©: 2
RessurexStudios In reply to bLAZZE92 [2014-06-01 17:56:50 +0000 UTC]
We know. We're taking a touch of artistic liberty on this one.
π: 0 β©: 0
tmac1kobe8vc15 In reply to bLAZZE92 [2014-02-06 17:17:03 +0000 UTC]
Well, isn't the upper estimate somewhere near 11m? Even so, it is still oversized.
π: 0 β©: 1
bLAZZE92 In reply to tmac1kobe8vc15 [2014-02-06 18:42:16 +0000 UTC]
Yes, but said estimate was based on the absolute size of the skull, ignoring the known postcranial material, not to mention that it also ignored the difference inΒ shape between the skull bones, the original 7 to 8m estimates are more accurate IMO.
π: 0 β©: 1
tmac1kobe8vc15 In reply to bLAZZE92 [2014-02-06 19:43:19 +0000 UTC]
Agreed. That's why I said upper estimate. 7 to 8m is definitely the more accurate estimate.
Regardless, the Ekrixinatosaurs in the picture is over sized. No way it is larger than a Giganotosaurus.
π: 0 β©: 1
theropod1 In reply to tmac1kobe8vc15 [2014-03-16 21:40:45 +0000 UTC]
yes, even an 11m abelisaur (assuming it was proportioned like that) wouldnβt outmatch a 12.4m+ Carcharodontosaur in terms of bulk.
π: 0 β©: 0
Dracorexius [2014-01-14 04:05:00 +0000 UTC]
Shouldn't the Sauropods neck and tails be a little thicker?? they look a little thin possibly shrink wrapped?
π: 0 β©: 1
RessurexStudios In reply to Dracorexius [2014-06-01 19:32:50 +0000 UTC]
we havent finished entirely with the modeling. thank you for your feedback.
π: 0 β©: 0
randomdinos [2014-01-03 11:41:27 +0000 UTC]
Wow, them models. Like everyone else, I like how you managed to represent the animals of a certain time period (a.k.a no Argentinosaurus=Giganotosaurus) but that Andesaurus looks too small, wasn't it supposed to be close to Argent's size?
π: 0 β©: 2
MorTalWawmbaht In reply to randomdinos [2014-01-03 18:18:43 +0000 UTC]
Nah, Andesaurus wasn't super big. Dougal Dixon's book said they were 100 ft long but that's not true, the vertebrae are far smaller than those of Argentinosaurus. They were more around 66 feet.
π: 0 β©: 1
randomdinos In reply to MorTalWawmbaht [2014-01-04 16:58:03 +0000 UTC]
Alright, thank you. 66 feet is still big though not super big, such as other titanosaurs.
π: 0 β©: 1
MorTalWawmbaht In reply to randomdinos [2014-01-05 06:32:35 +0000 UTC]
Yeah. Aint the biggest Titanosaur ever but its still the largest thing in it's environment.
π: 0 β©: 0
Yappartist [2013-12-30 17:10:21 +0000 UTC]
Alright you have a point. *if humans involved prays for a Prehistoric Park story*
π: 0 β©: 0
Yappartist [2013-12-28 16:42:24 +0000 UTC]
Good to have you back! All of these are from South america! Though where's an argentinosaurus?
π: 0 β©: 2
RessurexStudios In reply to Yappartist [2013-12-29 21:53:36 +0000 UTC]
Argentinosaurus didn't live in the time frame that this story is set. Also, Argentinosaurus has been overdone anyway, so why not bring another incredibly large but not as recognized dinosaur, Andesaurus, into the frame?
π: 0 β©: 0
EdaphosaurusPogonias In reply to Yappartist [2013-12-28 19:21:33 +0000 UTC]
Argentinosaurus and Giganotosaurus were not contemporary,Β GiganotosaurusΒ being form an earlier period of time.
π: 0 β©: 1