HOME | DD

RexcoCorps β€” Coincidence

Published: 2010-07-13 17:06:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 1959; Favourites: 23; Downloads: 8
Redirect to original
Description So despite all my rantings and ramblings about how Ken Penders can't claim these guys, I have proof!

I like Dylan's SatAm look better though. Less dorky and kinda Sparkster-ish...
Related content
Comments: 22

PG1224 [2023-08-13 16:57:05 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pokefan10002 [2019-03-02 20:33:31 +0000 UTC]

This is just hypocrisy on Ken Penders due to the lawsuit originally happened in the past.

I mean, they could just credit Ken Penders if they wish to draw them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nintrendodude [2019-01-24 15:59:10 +0000 UTC]

Someone stole from you:Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

hogues931 [2019-01-23 01:41:25 +0000 UTC]

mind if I use this as a meme, please?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nintrendodude In reply to hogues931 [2019-01-24 15:57:53 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

hogues931 In reply to Nintrendodude [2019-01-24 15:59:04 +0000 UTC]

oh wow just ignore me saying credit the artist who made the meme for the love of

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nintrendodude In reply to hogues931 [2019-01-24 16:03:30 +0000 UTC]

He didnt say you could take it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

hogues931 In reply to Nintrendodude [2019-01-24 16:06:50 +0000 UTC]

did kai say you could take her art no but you said it was okay cause it landed in creative freedom or something

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nintrendodude In reply to hogues931 [2019-01-24 16:09:47 +0000 UTC]

Creative commons. And thats legal.

Clearly you need to do research on creative commons

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

hogues931 In reply to Nintrendodude [2019-01-24 16:11:44 +0000 UTC]

ahuh did kai leave her artwork for some fool too edit and include in a meme complete utter bullshit

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nintrendodude In reply to hogues931 [2019-01-24 16:22:52 +0000 UTC]

The difference youre failing to realise is kai's art was marked under creative commons law: www.deviantart.com/kaithephaux… look to the right if youre on computer or in the description if youre on mobile


This is creative commons: creativecommons.org/licenses/b…
None of the stuff you stole was marked under creative commons.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

hogues931 In reply to Nintrendodude [2019-01-24 17:08:46 +0000 UTC]

I can't look she blocked me

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nintrendodude In reply to hogues931 [2019-01-24 17:13:27 +0000 UTC]

Use an incognito tab

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

hogues931 In reply to Nintrendodude [2019-01-24 17:17:14 +0000 UTC]

that's against the rules on DA if you try too evade someone blocking you by alts or logging out that's against the rules

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

hogues931 [2019-01-22 18:21:11 +0000 UTC]

OOOOHH

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nintrendodude [2018-06-25 15:30:20 +0000 UTC]

coincidence?:Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jared-The-Rabbit [2018-02-24 16:21:56 +0000 UTC]

So basically... he stole some characters and claimed them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JCFanfics In reply to Jared-The-Rabbit [2019-02-08 22:53:52 +0000 UTC]

Yep, and since he got his stink on them, he was able to take them away from Sega and Archie.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jared-The-Rabbit In reply to JCFanfics [2019-02-08 22:55:42 +0000 UTC]

Bruh

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

dth1971 [2018-02-21 15:41:47 +0000 UTC]

I know the last pic with Geoffrey St. John, but where did the other 3 pics come from?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Beau-Skunk [2010-11-13 22:38:12 +0000 UTC]

I heard some chars were based off of background chars in SatAM. So it shouldn't be that surprising.

Don't know if Ken Penders or whoever wrote those issues were directly inspired by SatAM, or given character model sheets to work with though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SEGAMew [2010-07-14 04:10:44 +0000 UTC]

Awww old Dylan looks so cute <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jared-The-Rabbit In reply to SEGAMew [2018-02-24 16:20:36 +0000 UTC]

I agree

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0