Comments: 39
GodzillaLagoon [2019-05-04 18:15:52 +0000 UTC]
Maximum megalodon size was 16 meters,not 18.Stop creating this shark fans' myth.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
NRD23456 In reply to GodzillaLagoon [2019-05-10 20:20:32 +0000 UTC]
I have to agree with you. Megalodon doesn't deserve that many fans. In my opinion the maximum length for this shark is the one you have already pointed out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NRD23456 In reply to GodzillaLagoon [2019-05-12 17:35:01 +0000 UTC]
Yep, you're welcome. That's the truth, we have had enough of the "gigantic" pop culture MEG.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ElSqiubbonator [2017-08-06 02:20:38 +0000 UTC]
Specifically, what formations is this episode based on?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RickRaptor105 In reply to ElSqiubbonator [2017-08-06 13:11:43 +0000 UTC]
This is the episode with the loosest ties to any real stratigraphic formation.
It started out as a purely South American episode about the Santa Cruz Formation, but when I split it up to include North American animals and marine animals it blurred into "roughly middle Miocene". Pelagornithids and C. megalodon are almost cosmopolitan and Gomphotherium and Amphicyon are widespread in North America, Eurasia and Africa.
This is the equivalent of a Pleistocene episode starring mammoths and saber-toothed cats. They are so ubiquitous that the episode could be set anywhere on the continent (unless you focus on something as specific as the tar pits).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RickRaptor105 In reply to Phillip2001 [2017-05-27 13:16:59 +0000 UTC]
Weil die Episode zur Hälfte in Nordamerika spielt - Gomphotherium und Tylocephalonyx kommen ebenfalls nicht in Südamerika vor.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ursumeles [2016-10-06 09:38:06 +0000 UTC]
Toll!
Mhmm, welche Tiere würdest du für erine deutsche Episode nehmen?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Phillip2001 In reply to Ursumeles [2017-05-27 13:20:58 +0000 UTC]
Naja , ich habe nicht damit gerechnet .
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RickRaptor105 In reply to Ursumeles [2016-10-06 10:06:59 +0000 UTC]
Eppelsheim. Von dort stammen die Typusexemplare von Deinotherium und Chalicotherium und der erste Fund eines fossilen Menschenaffen. Zudem gibt es dort noch andere Urelefanten, hornlose Nashörner, Urpferde, Bärenhunde, Säbelzahnkatzen und diverse Hirsche und Tapire.
www.dinotherium-museum.eppelsh…
Wenn das miozäne Amerika schon im originalen WWB enthalten gewesen wäre, hätte ich definitiv Eppelsheim als Schauplatz genommen.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tyrannotitan333 [2016-09-23 23:26:21 +0000 UTC]
How would you show the marine fauna if the episode would presumably follow the Osteodontornis?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RickRaptor105 In reply to Tyrannotitan333 [2016-09-23 23:50:39 +0000 UTC]
The Osteodontornis birds travel between North and South America and while they fly over the sea one dives down to catch a fish and is swallowed by a Livyatan or Megalodon. Cue some Megalodon and Livyatan scenes.
Think of the Ornithocheirus episode when the Utahraptor hunt begins. The Ornithocheirus is pretty much absent during those events, too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
acepredator In reply to RickRaptor105 [2016-09-24 00:42:41 +0000 UTC]
Why have the bird eaten at all?
Just show the birds stealing food from the big marine predators. Gulls and tubenoses do it all the time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PCAwesomeness In reply to acepredator [2016-09-24 00:51:19 +0000 UTC]
BECAUSE BIG BIRD TASTE GOOD TO JAWS/MOBY DICK
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ElSqiubbonator In reply to RickRaptor105 [2016-09-23 23:55:42 +0000 UTC]
I love that idea. In Miocene Argentina, fish catches you!
Of course, it would have to be the Megalodon for that joke to work, since the Livyatan is a mammal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mistercoelurosaur [2016-09-23 23:06:23 +0000 UTC]
Aww, no thalassocnus. Pretty cool idea anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
acepredator [2016-09-23 21:49:09 +0000 UTC]
Also:
- Pelagiarctos is likely a prey generalist like most living Pinnipedia and could (and likely would) still eat other pinnipeds of occasion (sea lions do it often, so why not?). It would be IMO like a Steller's sea lion in behavior.
- I would not call Livyatan prey small. Much smaller than the whale itself, definitely, but still huge compared to humans.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ElSqiubbonator In reply to acepredator [2016-09-23 21:59:07 +0000 UTC]
So, maybe up to the size of a Pelagiarctos, then?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to ElSqiubbonator [2016-09-23 23:06:12 +0000 UTC]
I'd say something the size of a cetothere or orca
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
acepredator [2016-09-23 21:45:27 +0000 UTC]
It's here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PCAwesomeness [2016-09-23 20:59:10 +0000 UTC]
Miocene predators be like:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZ0YaW…
Anyways, nice!
Also, will there be a struggle between the majestic Livyatan and the Charcharshuckles megalondon?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
PCAwesomeness In reply to Wyatt-Andrews-Art [2016-09-24 16:00:56 +0000 UTC]
Heh, thank you. It's the first thing I thought of when I saw this deviation's title.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to PCAwesomeness [2016-09-23 21:45:47 +0000 UTC]
Can we just stop with the Livyatan vs C. megalodon thing?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
ElSqiubbonator In reply to acepredator [2016-09-23 21:57:59 +0000 UTC]
Yes, please. See, I was always under the impression that Megalodon specialized in hunting prey as large as itself (read: baleen whales) while Livyatan was more of a generalist, going after things like large fish, squid, seals, and dolphins.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to ElSqiubbonator [2016-09-23 23:05:38 +0000 UTC]
Neither were specialists in the strict sense-the shark ate pretty much anything it could kill while Livyatan ate most large animals smaller than itself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ElSqiubbonator In reply to acepredator [2016-09-23 23:53:44 +0000 UTC]
Well, maybe specialist wasn't quite the right word. I was thinking about something more along the lines of the sort of niche differentiation that must have existed between, say, Allosaurus and Ceratosaurus in late Jurassic North America.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bhut [2016-09-23 20:47:27 +0000 UTC]
I don't know about the megalodon; some people think that it might be more like the mako or bull shark instead.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Flameal15k [2016-09-23 20:23:34 +0000 UTC]
Nice. Decided to go around the world, I see..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0