Comments: 25
FloofyDinoLover [2016-03-03 16:10:21 +0000 UTC]
Sharks low on the food chain?
Now I have seen it all
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Somoist555 [2015-10-10 23:36:55 +0000 UTC]
I swear Hibbertopterus looks like the birth-child of a Horseshoe Crab and a Cephalaspis.
Also, Nice drawing skills m8!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
PCAwesomeness [2015-10-05 01:49:25 +0000 UTC]
Would it be fanboyish to say that Rhizodus could jump on land and attack prey close to the shore in the least bit?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to PCAwesomeness [2015-11-23 00:50:13 +0000 UTC]
No. We actually have track evidence of that.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
PCAwesomeness In reply to kungfuflower [2015-12-17 23:17:25 +0000 UTC]
You just skipped the whole argument, didn't you...
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
kungfuflower In reply to PCAwesomeness [2015-12-17 23:25:59 +0000 UTC]
i can use tornado like hal from angry birds go and icy banana peels
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Ursumeles [2015-09-26 15:58:50 +0000 UTC]
Yes,Rhizodus!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
CJCroen [2015-09-17 23:11:35 +0000 UTC]
I dunno about this episode, there's something mighty fishy about it! *dodges tomato*
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Tyrannotitan333 [2015-09-17 07:46:25 +0000 UTC]
Just wondering, are a lot of the "imported" animals because of the fact that the formations you chose were kind of scrappy in what they preserve, or is it just to make a more interesting cast? My inner pedant is feeling a huge nitpicking urge, that's all. XD
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
RickRaptor105 In reply to Tyrannotitan333 [2015-09-17 14:38:09 +0000 UTC]
It´s because of both reasons.
As I´ve commented pretty much every time someone asked about Walking with Monsters, there aren´t that many well-known faunal assemblages and they usually don´t have the diversity that would make for an interesting cast (I think I should have mentioned in the description of the last episode that I originally had the dunkleosteid Eastmanosteus in mind. There is a species of this genus known from the Gogo Formation, E. calliaspis, and it´s 1.5 meters long - which already makes it one of the largest fish known from the Gogo Formation. So maybe I could have made a setting focusing just on small to medium-sized reef-dwelling fish. But I really wanted to feature Dunkleosteus somewhere, especially because it was neglected in the original WWM, and a Dunkleosteus in a marine setting still makes more sense than a Dunkleosteus in a murky river.)
Also, many Paleozoic animals have very vague information about their exact age or location. Crassigyrinus´ age is stated as 345-328 million years and Stethacanthus´ age is 385-320 million years, which makes them rather easy to just slap on any setting within that time frame.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
PCAwesomeness [2015-09-16 23:02:34 +0000 UTC]
Anyways, will we be seeing Gigantoscorpio in the Late Carboniferous?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
RickRaptor105 In reply to PCAwesomeness [2015-09-17 00:10:55 +0000 UTC]
Gigantoscorpio is from the same age as these Early Carboniferous animals.
And no, there will not be any more chelicerates in the following episodes. Apart from the two most popular arthropods remaining, the age of the arthropods is already over. The Carboniferous used to be called "The Age of Amphibians" before WWM presented it as an "arthropods vs vertebrates" feud.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
PCAwesomeness In reply to RickRaptor105 [2015-09-17 00:20:26 +0000 UTC]
So, it seems that the eurypterids will be the only chelicerates. Oh well. Can't wait to see how that 8.5-foot long millipede and that seagull-sized dragonfly turn out.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Leggurm [2015-09-16 21:42:31 +0000 UTC]
Will you do your own Walking with Beasts after this series?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
RickRaptor105 In reply to Leggurm [2015-09-16 21:49:01 +0000 UTC]
Well, since I´m uploading this series exactly one year after the WWD version, I guess I am due in September 2016...
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
PCAwesomeness [2015-09-16 21:30:36 +0000 UTC]
Awesome!
Also, yay for more eurypterids and that piscine punching bag (Stethacanthus)!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
bhut [2015-09-16 21:15:05 +0000 UTC]
What a neat menagerie, again!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
acepredator [2015-09-16 20:45:00 +0000 UTC]
No Helicoprion? NOOO!
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
RickRaptor105 In reply to acepredator [2015-09-16 20:47:24 +0000 UTC]
Yes, no Helicoprion.
There´s barely any information available on Permian marine life, anyway.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
RickRaptor105 In reply to Jdailey1991 [2015-09-19 23:22:48 +0000 UTC]
Because after spending three of six episodes in the water, I couldn´t fit another marine setting into the second half where I have the Carboniferous coal swamps, three Permian settings and two Triassic settings.
Plus I can´t find much information about Helicoprion´s marine contemporaries.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1