HOME | DD

ridia — Eyes are not Oculars

Published: 2006-03-15 05:29:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 1181; Favourites: 22; Downloads: 20
Redirect to original
Description Stupir RPer Tricks Stamp 1 - Eyes are not Occulars.


Stock photo from: [link]
Related content
Comments: 43

SammiWolf [2011-03-30 17:25:12 +0000 UTC]

ahaha! Thank you! Now if only the idiots would listen! D: Which brings me to "ears are not auds!" Man I hate that! I keep running from Furc to get away from stuff like that. lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ridia In reply to SammiWolf [2011-03-30 20:40:51 +0000 UTC]

Someday... someday... they might look back on their sordid pasts and /facepalm.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SammiWolf In reply to ridia [2011-03-30 20:53:34 +0000 UTC]

Pardon me if I don't hold out much hope. Though, I did convert one a few years back. lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ridia In reply to SammiWolf [2011-03-30 21:27:09 +0000 UTC]

Woot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TwigHat [2011-03-29 17:39:42 +0000 UTC]

I used to use fancy synonyms when I feralRP'd; AND SOMETIMES I even still use the word "pillars" to describe one of my very tall character's legs. However; I stopped being ridiculous and flowery, because I realized that it just got in the way. Some people just didn't fucking understand what I was saying. This didn't make me superior at all, I like the people I RP with to get what I'm saying. So? I stopped being a dumbass and wrote properly.

The end! LOL I love this stamp.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ridia In reply to TwigHat [2011-03-29 22:52:20 +0000 UTC]

Bending and twisting the English language in ways it wasn't meant to be never made anyone superior. I'm still trying to figure out when and where and who decided an 'audit' was an ear, rather than tax-related.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwigHat In reply to ridia [2011-03-29 22:54:47 +0000 UTC]

HARKS were my favorite... though the one thing I do to describe one of my character's eyes is refer to them as his "blues". I still do this today, but I think that's the extent of my synonym use.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ridia In reply to TwigHat [2011-03-29 23:05:02 +0000 UTC]

That might confuse some people unless they're eased into the reference with a prior commentary on the eyes somewhere in the text.

What the heck is/was Harks used for?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwigHat In reply to ridia [2011-03-29 23:27:11 +0000 UTC]

Ears lolol Ears: Harks, Auds, Lobes, Listeners, Sentinels, Receivers... yeah, ridiculous

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ridia In reply to TwigHat [2011-03-29 23:33:15 +0000 UTC]

....what.

What.

WHAAAAT?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwigHat In reply to ridia [2011-03-29 23:53:03 +0000 UTC]

Hahahahehehehee!!!!! Oh yes, just wait;

EYES: Orbs, Oculars, Pools, Lanterns, Spheres, Orbits, Globes, Visionaries, Opticals, Luminaries, Voids

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ridia In reply to TwigHat [2011-03-30 00:01:13 +0000 UTC]

Faith in humanity diminishing.
Grasp of english language failing..
what.. is..
....vittu.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nuclear-SODA [2010-02-14 02:08:09 +0000 UTC]

Sorry for commenting on an older stamp but this pissed me off.

People that use synonyms are trying to spice up their posts. Don't be an ass. I use synonyms. SHOOT ME. Just plain old "eyes", "tail", and "legs" sound...stupid. If you're a crappy RPer and use fancy words, I can understand but some people know how to use synonyms and make them sound good. So don't go and say that all synonyms are stupid. That is a dumb ass, closed-minded assumption. They're fine as long as you don't OVER USE them. And there are plenty of people who don't.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Zandrae In reply to Nuclear-SODA [2010-02-14 03:54:12 +0000 UTC]

You're bad and you should feel bad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nuclear-SODA In reply to Zandrae [2010-02-14 07:56:23 +0000 UTC]

Well, I don't feel bad. I should feel bad for having an opinion? Huh. I didn't know it was against the law to state your opinion these days.That's a damn shame.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Zandrae In reply to Nuclear-SODA [2010-02-14 11:47:28 +0000 UTC]

English is not opinion. The meanings of words are not defined by how under-educated insecure feraltard RPers on the interwebs misuse them as an attempt to make themselves look more intelligent than they actually are. Sadly, all they manage to do is make themselves look like wankers.

You're free to think that you're more intelligent and literate than actual scholars of the English language if you want. We're free to think you're a fucktard.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nuclear-SODA In reply to Zandrae [2010-02-14 20:21:30 +0000 UTC]

And I also never said I think I'm more intelligent and literate than actual scholars of the English language. What you're doing, my friend, is putting words in my mouth. You are free to think I'm a fucktard. But according to my test results, I'm smarter than most people my age. Again, think what you like and use what I just said any way you want.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zandrae In reply to Nuclear-SODA [2010-03-06 20:38:53 +0000 UTC]

And according to my test results, I'm a genius, but that's neither here nor there.

The whole purpose of this deviation is a vehement disagreement with ill-chosen "synonyms" utilized by the thesaurus raping insecure adolescent feraltards (like yourself) as a way to somehow validate themselves as being a good writer and a good player.

Said children took down their noses at those of us who actually pay attention to the widely accepted literary style guides such as the one I responded to you with earlier: Do not be tempted by a twenty-dollar word when there is a ten-center handy, ready and able.

No. "Oculars" is not an appropriate synonym for "Eyes", nor are "Auds" or "Pinnae" reasonable synonyms for "Ears". Don't even get me started on "Brujo".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nuclear-SODA In reply to Zandrae [2010-03-08 22:08:44 +0000 UTC]

I'm no less of a genius than you are, my friend. It doesn't matter who's the genius, though.

And why are you calling me an insecure adolescent feraltard? You don't even know me. I'm not insecure in the least. I don't act like a crazy teenager. Nor have I ever acted like one. Of course, I do expect a disagreement on your part. And, really? "Feraltard" isn't a word. Get a dictionary, you douche. Especially if you're going to lie about being a genius because to me, you don't seem like one.

And I never said "oculars" were eyes. I never said "auds" were ears. You're putting words in my mouth. I use PROPER synonyms for a more poetic feel. Just saying "eyes" or "ears" all the time is a little boring and bland. But I'm done with this stupid shit. Don't expect me to reply to your stupid ass comments anymore. Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zandrae In reply to Nuclear-SODA [2010-05-05 01:40:25 +0000 UTC]

People who roleplay "feral" crap are people I consider "Feraltards". A "Feraltard" is a portmanteau of "Feral" and "Retard". Surely an intelligent 'writer' like yourself should be familiar with portmanteau.

The act of thesaurus rape comes from the Feraltard community.

Changing out a word for a synonym because it's "poetic" is not proper, it makes for crap.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ridia In reply to Nuclear-SODA [2010-02-14 11:09:07 +0000 UTC]

So why are you calling me a "closed-minded" "dumbass" in my DA on a stamp that declares my opinion?

As you said, I didn't know it was against the law the state my opinion.

Man, that's a damn shame.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Nuclear-SODA In reply to ridia [2010-02-14 20:23:54 +0000 UTC]

Everyone continues to put words in my mouth. I never said you weren't free to state your opinion. You stated yours, I stated mine. End of story. Yes, I got pissed and so did you, I'm sure. But that's what happens when you have people with two different opinions about something.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ridia In reply to Nuclear-SODA [2010-02-15 05:15:10 +0000 UTC]

Why are you assuming I'm pissed? Why are you assuming I care enough about your opinion to get more than mildly amused?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zandrae In reply to ridia [2010-02-14 11:57:01 +0000 UTC]

/thread

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ridia In reply to Nuclear-SODA [2010-02-14 03:45:32 +0000 UTC]

Oculars really are not eyes, however. Oculars is not a synonym for eyes. Go to Google, type definecular, and hit enter. Of, relating to, or looking like an eye. However, this word is not interchangeable for eye. It's closer to a lens.


To quote Mark Twain on Fenimore Cooper's literary offenses, "Use the right word, not its second cousin."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nuclear-SODA In reply to ridia [2010-02-14 07:51:24 +0000 UTC]

I never said oculars were eyes but you seem to be saying that even people who DO use synonyms the right way are "dumb RPers". But hey, whatever. I have my opinion and you guys have yours. Even if your opinions piss me off. Mine probably piss you off as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Zandrae In reply to Nuclear-SODA [2010-02-14 11:52:40 +0000 UTC]

"14. Avoid Fancy Words.
Avoid the elaborate, the pretentious, the coy, and the cute. Do not be tempted by a twenty-dollar word when there is a ten-center handy, ready and able. Anglo-Saxon is a livelier tongue than Latin, so use Anglo-Saxon words. In this, as in so many matters pertaining to style, one's ear must be one's guide: "gut" is a lustier noun than "intestine," but the two words are not interchangeable, because "gut" is often inappropriate, being too coarse for the context. Never call a stomach a tummy without good reason." --Strunk and White's Elements of Style

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ridia In reply to Nuclear-SODA [2010-02-14 10:16:37 +0000 UTC]

You're inferring a lot from a statement about specific instances of incorrect word usage. Especially since eyes and oculars are not in fact synonyms. I'm not angry at you for expressing your opinion, however, as there is nothing to be angry about. The clear answer to the problem is that neither of us RPs with the other. As I doubt we're in danger of doing so, that negates any reason for a strong opinion regarding you either way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gdspell [2008-05-31 17:09:50 +0000 UTC]

Indeed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PeligrosoRebellion [2008-03-02 04:49:47 +0000 UTC]

Ugh. So true. And a banner isn't a tail, and pillars aren't legs and blah.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zankira [2008-02-07 01:02:38 +0000 UTC]

Eyes are also not orbs. :c Especially if they shine or glow in some way.
I don't RP, but I'm using this because it applies to all the times I've read ridiculous synonyms in badfic.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ToySkunk [2006-08-19 22:12:45 +0000 UTC]

Gotta use this - LOVE IT!!
Thank you for a stamp that the world sorely needs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ridia In reply to ToySkunk [2006-08-19 23:18:50 +0000 UTC]

It is my service to humanity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ravnen [2006-03-15 08:03:15 +0000 UTC]

OH no, my opthalmics! Dx

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ridia In reply to ravnen [2006-03-15 19:24:30 +0000 UTC]

ohnose!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

oopswrongcookie [2006-03-15 06:02:03 +0000 UTC]

OH GOD!!! And make one that says ears ar not AUDs or Harks....Stupid abuse of the English language.....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ridia In reply to oopswrongcookie [2006-03-15 06:13:13 +0000 UTC]

I'm currently looking for a good stock photo of an ear, but if all else fails, I'll just use my own. I'm going to follow this up for like, well.. a stamp version of all my dumb RPer tricks ones. xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oopswrongcookie In reply to ridia [2006-03-15 07:31:58 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ridia In reply to oopswrongcookie [2006-03-15 07:49:57 +0000 UTC]

Need.... picture.... of... ear.....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oopswrongcookie In reply to ridia [2006-03-15 16:01:24 +0000 UTC]

Google it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ridia In reply to oopswrongcookie [2006-03-15 19:01:35 +0000 UTC]

Copyright infringement, much?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oopswrongcookie In reply to ridia [2006-03-16 00:10:21 +0000 UTC]

For a picture of an ear?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ridia In reply to oopswrongcookie [2006-03-16 01:22:56 +0000 UTC]

You never, ever know, man. xx

👍: 0 ⏩: 0