sirrliv [2018-12-07 01:32:48 +0000 UTC]
The heat generated during compression probably wasn't so much of a problem since in most systems the compression happens at stationary recharging points along the line at which the locomotive can be topped up. The real problem is the cooling of the compressed air expanding again, which can cause massive issues such as valves and pistons freezing, metal becoming brittle as it chills, and ice forming in places you don't want ice to form.
By far the most successful answer to this cooling issue were the Mekarski trams of the 1890's to early 1900's, which employed small gas-fired water tube boilers to inject small amounts of steam into the compressed air lines to keep them heated enough to avoid the freezing problem. This also allowed for the injection of lubrication oil at the same time. For a brief time around the Turn of the 20th Century the Mekarski trams dominated tramways throughout France; the double decker models in particular were once as much a symbol of Paris as the boulevards they ran along. Well regarded for their efficiency and relative quiet operation, far moreso than equivalent steam trams, their time in the sun was nonetheless surprisingly brief as by the mid-1900's electrification of tramways saw them all off, electric trams being, among their many advantages, easier to maintain. Sadly, none of the original Mekarski trams survived, but a group in Bern, Switzerland, the same that operates the city's historic steam tram on special occasions, has launched a project to build a new single decker Mekarski for the first time in over a century.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
benitezdk [2018-12-06 13:30:19 +0000 UTC]
... And I guess, coal was cheap! ... An elegant solution if working in an inflammable area!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0