Comments: 45
strigoi-mort [2011-11-29 14:01:45 +0000 UTC]
nice... sometimes i really like to work on old and expired films, results are unexpectable but sometimes very interesting ;]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
semuta [2011-08-05 12:31:24 +0000 UTC]
kudos for working on 1953 media
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PavelNedkov [2011-06-19 06:28:39 +0000 UTC]
Once I showed a girl on the bus my Zorki 4 and I told her it uses film and she laughed.... people just don't understand that film shoots better than digital. Anyways great shot!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Huneprut In reply to roadmouse [2011-01-14 10:18:13 +0000 UTC]
Yeah I know. But in my experience Agfa papers does not seem to age as fast as other papers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
charlesguerin [2010-10-24 15:03:48 +0000 UTC]
nice photo!! what is the paper developer? it seem like lith print
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
multix [2010-10-22 10:56:40 +0000 UTC]
Portriga was a very good paper. I miss Brovira even more...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
multix In reply to roadmouse [2010-10-27 07:16:01 +0000 UTC]
Fiber based papers are very interesting indeed. Todays paper are different though, the emulsion is thinner. Especially in a scanned image, you will notice less difference than expected in most images. I think fiber-based papers yield richer deep tones and sometimes smoother highlight transitions, which one can use to print with brighter whites. This in my experience when comparing Ilford Multigrade Resin Coated and Fiber Based, which should be fairly similar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
roadmouse In reply to multix [2010-10-27 07:29:14 +0000 UTC]
I've heard similar things about fiber based papers. When I need to buy new, my next box will be fiber based, and give it a try.
Also, I recently discovered my print dryer doesn't work well with RC papers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tyutlin [2010-10-15 21:57:12 +0000 UTC]
I really liked this shot. and nice to know that he filmed the Soviet camera! great paper! and composition. keep it up!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
xxDEcOYxx [2010-09-29 07:54:23 +0000 UTC]
Very nice!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jantinus [2010-09-21 12:40:38 +0000 UTC]
ik vind het vet dat je net de spocket holes nog ziet aan de onderkant dat zijn leuke details!
verder ook gewoon een super goeie foto!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
robynthepaperboy [2010-08-31 17:32:12 +0000 UTC]
very classic landscape.
how long did you process this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
roadmouse In reply to robynthepaperboy [2010-09-01 08:43:14 +0000 UTC]
I don't remember the exact details. But I know I had to overexpose and underdevelop a lot.
I think I've exposed this one for 1 till 1,5min, and develop for 15 to 20 sec.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BoccaBella [2010-08-14 04:58:13 +0000 UTC]
Love the out of date paper effect!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rain [2010-08-11 15:50:23 +0000 UTC]
The crazier it is - the more you are satisfied by the result!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rain In reply to roadmouse [2010-08-12 12:49:04 +0000 UTC]
Actually, I'm proud of people who still develop films and print photos themselves. There is something magical when you do it with your own hands. I know, it's really chemical, but still when you are doing it yourself you put a little bit more into every picture. Every fingerprint on a film roll, every dust scratch or overexposure on a fresh print - it's a part of you in there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
multix In reply to roadmouse [2010-10-22 11:00:58 +0000 UTC]
The camera list is deemed to grow. Live with that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
multix In reply to roadmouse [2010-10-27 07:08:28 +0000 UTC]
We need to define if it is indeed an illness.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0