HOME | DD

roomwithoutaview β€” three of us

Published: 2006-05-17 15:38:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 1574; Favourites: 41; Downloads: 142
Redirect to original
Description some form of digital abstract
couple of hours in photoshop
...
not sure if this is finished or if the composition is how I wanted it
but I've been looking at it too long now to care


comments appreciated even if they are just to tell me it's a load of wank
Related content

roomwithoutaview - sleeve - untitled i

roomwithoutaview - Unfiltered Flatscape

roomwithoutaview - futurism remix

roomwithoutaview - forgotten

roomwithoutaview - exist

roomwithoutaview - lf

roomwithoutaview - industrial landscape

roomwithoutaview - communication breakdown

roomwithoutaview - russia

davespertine - winter is coming

aerostato - jhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhjhj

necron - necronv004 - teaser

dr4oz - Nobody Move

iram - wall tree white

steve2727 - Arsenal

Trafial - 16

Senecal - PLAN

PLB606 - P1200804
Comments: 24

l-fer-ABe [2007-01-31 09:08:10 +0000 UTC]

its sooo cool!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fractalien [2006-12-07 05:27:23 +0000 UTC]

wow amazing!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

onlyowls [2006-10-23 20:05:42 +0000 UTC]

hot day on a beach

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fleetofgypsies [2006-09-15 14:21:48 +0000 UTC]

really neat, flying machines. gunships...a cool neo-retroism...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

faulty [2006-07-02 21:02:45 +0000 UTC]

Looks wonderful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sugarstack [2006-06-15 21:14:42 +0000 UTC]

Colours and comp are awesome on this, gj man =].

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

reneg8bober [2006-06-04 11:45:42 +0000 UTC]

fuck yeah

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

toThePixel [2006-05-26 07:03:43 +0000 UTC]

Very good compsition man, one of the very few things I've liked lately

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

systmaei [2006-05-20 08:25:10 +0000 UTC]

Woot. Wankin'.. I'm totally wankin'.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mt24 [2006-05-18 15:28:23 +0000 UTC]

looks like water-colors. good job

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

rawimage [2006-05-18 09:52:31 +0000 UTC]

another action lost I guess :[
so I suppose it's redundant like a load of wank on a paper towel.
but it's beautiful - no doubt

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

roomwithoutaview In reply to rawimage [2006-05-18 10:35:26 +0000 UTC]

haha
trust me you wouldn't want to see an action of this being made
I have a whole heap of stills mate, just having trouble finding interesting ways to make them move :/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rawimage In reply to roomwithoutaview [2006-05-18 12:39:33 +0000 UTC]

yesterday, in my keenest dream, I had this brilliant idea...
picture this: seΓ±or GAK is creating an action (or even a few) - containing his wonderful picture treatment (maybe he'll encounter some trouble working the way he's used to, but I bet he's smart enough to find work arounds, which maybe will even lead him to a yet unknown level of creativity). Then, on a wonderful sunshiny day, my message window is flashing yellow, containing a note telling me I should check out the actions. All sweaty and nervously shivering all over my body I unzip them, open PS, load up the files - and find some (actually) working action scripts. [the way with flash is still cool, but now it comes] I take a videoclip dissolve it into single frames, and guess what - batch them right away with your action. What do you think of that!?!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

djairin [2006-05-18 00:43:08 +0000 UTC]

it's a load of nice wank

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

roomwithoutaview In reply to djairin [2006-05-18 10:36:33 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

spoudastis [2006-05-17 17:16:21 +0000 UTC]

great work man, i have to say that you are one of the best on DA for sure

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

roomwithoutaview In reply to spoudastis [2006-05-17 19:18:15 +0000 UTC]

I don't think you know how to browse the site properly...
(but thanks man)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

spoudastis In reply to roomwithoutaview [2006-05-17 21:06:57 +0000 UTC]

heh heh

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

greenoranges [2006-05-17 16:32:37 +0000 UTC]

"it's a load of wank"

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

roomwithoutaview In reply to greenoranges [2006-05-17 19:16:46 +0000 UTC]

haha, ...well thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

erkonom [2006-05-17 16:05:21 +0000 UTC]

i wanna see details, looks pretty cool from here...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

roomwithoutaview In reply to erkonom [2006-05-17 19:15:50 +0000 UTC]

cheers erk, the file is 3000x4600... I think it lost something in the resize too :/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

leafface In reply to roomwithoutaview [2006-09-14 21:30:16 +0000 UTC]

why did you resize it? da supports large images as well

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

erkonom In reply to roomwithoutaview [2006-05-17 23:26:28 +0000 UTC]

it would be nice to see this at least 900 pix wide, the beauty is in the details :]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0