Comments: 118
arhcamt In reply to Runewitch [2007-09-25 06:40:02 +0000 UTC]
ur very welcome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hewsan [2007-09-15 00:07:24 +0000 UTC]
Greetings,
This image is being featured in this news article [link] that is showcasing work, that has been posted in the "Fantasy" section of the photomanipulation gallery.
If you enjoy the article, clicking the green "love it" icon will help make it possible for more people to be aware as well.
Appreciate,
~hewsan
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Runewitch In reply to hewsan [2007-09-15 00:32:13 +0000 UTC]
Wow, thanks very much. I shall go check it out forthwith!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
knightie [2007-06-23 04:49:19 +0000 UTC]
very lovely
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
knightie In reply to Runewitch [2007-06-24 01:25:32 +0000 UTC]
Your very welcome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MUTTAS [2007-03-31 00:43:29 +0000 UTC]
good work! predestination of the woods...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beleave [2007-01-01 17:20:30 +0000 UTC]
i'm not a fan of photomanip, per se, cuz i'm a stubborn stuckmud traditionalist or older than i ever believed i would get, and also cuz i wouldn't be able to stand using other's stuff in something i do -- which i know is somewhat silly cuz all we do is inspired by all we see consciously or not), though that doesn't explain refusing using my own stuff to make manips; but this fits my mood and it looks near flawless. can't tell it is manip until i full-view, and barely then. (it mainly concerns the woman -- once anyone adds a figure to a mostly nature photomanip, it often sticks out, though she almost looks natural -- looking at the original woman's image, it's clear why, the coloring for her is totally off the coloring/shades/lights/shadows of the nature shots, and extracting (?right word) her and applying whatever filter/effect only goes so far sometimes. especially given hers is such an old-time type romantic renaissance-like classic pose, which makes the image as a whole look un-natural even to an open mind if there is the slightest thing -- even if one can't point it out -- a little off.
as i would not like to remain a stuckmud oldie, would you mind telling me how you accomplish such a manip? i can guess, probably accurately, but i'd like to *know*
thanks much, very much, if you descide to indulge me.
bless--wayne
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beleave In reply to Runewitch [2007-01-01 20:52:15 +0000 UTC]
yes. it was almost exactly what i thought you did. photoshop is so self-explanatory that figuring out how to do stuff that you don't even care about (but you're bored) is easy. same for digital cameras, even the most complex ones.
the hard part, natch, is erasing the little parts you don't want or extracting or whatever. al that patience and fine work. me have a steady hand not. not with this stuff -- painting and drawing with traditional media i am fine usually
do you use a wacom tablet? -- i did some combining where i needed to outline something and using the mousepad is a pain in the arse.
i's suggest desaturating her a bit more. (or, as i point out further down, darkening the sky) or maybe what my eye is seeing is just the anachronism of that classic pose, especially in winter. she'd be freezing!
i know i'm doing some shots in a month of my self in the snow and ice (or my love before that if it snows in NY) where i am either nude or draped in a sheet or something similar and without he original lighting inseritng a shot of me like that from an (evenly lit, even) darkroom to make a photomanip would look fake, even if a little.
maybe it is also that she is in the center of the shot. to the left or right might help. or even a better thing might be to make the clouds on the entire center-to-upper left-and-middle darker? they dominate the shot with the space they take up.
it's so close to beng perfect. and a great idea.
it grabbed my atention!
keep it up.
bless and thanks--wayne
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beleave In reply to Runewitch [2007-01-02 18:57:27 +0000 UTC]
rebuttals kick ass < smiles >
perfect analogy about drawing with the mouse pad! what size wacom do you use? i'm curious if the size is all that important in case i decide to get one.
i love the image, i just love it so much i wish it were "perfect" and it seems a little off, for me -- ME, that's all. opinions are like assholes as we all know.
maybe i have an eye for spotting the slightest thing not totally perfect in a manip and don't know how to describe it. whatever. mabe it's becuz i almost died from cold exposure as a kid and that's not the posture one would usually take when dying of freezing -- maybe it she was dead (or minutes from) and fallen. plus her limbs would be turning greyish. and face. just a fact. frostbite does that.
no question a great concept and very good work. keep it up.
i still gottsta look through the rest of your gallery!
bless-w.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beleave In reply to Runewitch [2007-01-06 06:10:52 +0000 UTC]
i didn;t realize she was magical and the tree dying is what is killling her. that makes it an even better concept.
trees die slow though. (i swear i am *not* nitpicking at your creation or concept.) not sure if that impression is given. of course it doesn;t matter as it is fantasy. fantasy doesn;t need to obey the standard rules of science. thank goodness.
i've always wished i was a quick sketcher, but i am a slow, plodding drawer. i mean to get a wacom though, i don't want to be a stuffy old man refusing to try. there must bee wonderful ways of painting, which is what i much prefer -- i love oil painting (acrylics too, using mediums to increase working time). i find it a more crative and less technical thing.
you are clearly an excellent illustrater. combined with your imagination, that is potent stuff.
bless--wayne, trying to imagine not looking at his hands when drawing/painting (isn't that as counterintuiive as driving with your eyes closed?!?!?!????)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beleave In reply to Runewitch [2007-01-07 09:36:06 +0000 UTC]
well if i ever draw somethign digitally i'll let you know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Runewitch In reply to beleave [2007-01-07 09:52:13 +0000 UTC]
I'd like to see it if you do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BFG [2006-12-18 10:39:14 +0000 UTC]
Really well done. great atmosphere. This was my choice for the comp.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BFG In reply to Runewitch [2006-12-18 17:56:26 +0000 UTC]
Well in my humble view it was good enough for a print
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Runewitch In reply to BFG [2006-12-18 18:00:26 +0000 UTC]
Thanks muchly for that great compliment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ralindir [2006-12-16 03:57:56 +0000 UTC]
That's beautiful...
Ral
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>