Comments: 39
NavJAG [2011-03-25 11:18:15 +0000 UTC]
Nice work - would never want to get in a dog fight with that bird!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to NavJAG [2011-03-25 17:15:23 +0000 UTC]
That makes two of us. X3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SindreAHN [2009-12-03 22:08:28 +0000 UTC]
the models are cool but why have u air brushed stripes and leave some in clear plastic colour ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to SindreAHN [2009-12-04 01:30:56 +0000 UTC]
The clear plastic is supposed to be the cockpit canopy, or in some instances the lenses over external lights. They're clear on the real airplane, so they're clear on the model.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarkProxy [2009-09-27 02:25:19 +0000 UTC]
nice work I never have had much luck with restore job on birds
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to DarkProxy [2009-09-27 03:21:50 +0000 UTC]
Back only two years ago or so, I'd never try a restoration as I would ruin it. But now that my skills have been refined, I can restore anything I have. My Su-37 [link] was the most difficult restoration of them all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarkProxy In reply to Russian-Fox [2009-09-27 03:35:26 +0000 UTC]
I'll stay away from that thanks I mean for me at least
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to DarkProxy [2009-09-27 03:37:11 +0000 UTC]
Ah. Well, maybe you can try in the future sometime after ya hone your skills.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AerospacerJ [2009-09-20 05:38:57 +0000 UTC]
The last of the Grumman beauties.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AerospacerJ In reply to Russian-Fox [2009-09-20 05:52:25 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, if I had a choice between the F-14D and the Su-27k, I wouldn't be able to pick because they're both so awesome
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AerospacerJ In reply to Russian-Fox [2009-09-20 06:02:29 +0000 UTC]
Yeah,.... One thing's for sure; I won't pick an F/A-18E/F, or F-35c
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to AerospacerJ [2009-09-20 06:13:23 +0000 UTC]
I hear ya. I'd rather have a Super Hornet over the Lightning II, and the Tomcat over them both.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AerospacerJ In reply to Russian-Fox [2009-09-20 06:18:21 +0000 UTC]
I'd rather have the old C/D's over the supers actually.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to AerospacerJ [2009-09-20 06:25:02 +0000 UTC]
I can see why. The C/D models actually have better thrust to weight ratios.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AerospacerJ In reply to Russian-Fox [2009-09-21 00:40:37 +0000 UTC]
Yep, not to mention they don't NEED FBW just to fly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AerospacerJ In reply to Russian-Fox [2009-09-21 23:51:04 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, you'll never know when your comp will fry ><
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to AerospacerJ [2009-09-22 00:46:44 +0000 UTC]
Exactly. When you're up at 30,000 and 500 miles from home when that happens, you'll be kicking yourself for not having an auxiliary.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AerospacerJ In reply to Russian-Fox [2009-09-23 00:28:52 +0000 UTC]
Yeah! the X-31, B-2 and soooo many F-22's were lost to this problem alone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to AerospacerJ [2009-09-23 00:34:31 +0000 UTC]
Wait, how many F22s have been lost? I know one of the prototypes crashed on take off, but I thought that was the only one...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AerospacerJ In reply to Russian-Fox [2009-09-23 00:42:43 +0000 UTC]
Well come to think of it there are only two; the first one being the prototype you mentioned, and the other one being one of the mass production types. Upon takeoff it suddenly sent itself through uncontrolled maneuvers. The pilot had to bail before too much more could happen.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to AerospacerJ [2009-09-23 00:48:22 +0000 UTC]
Ah, I see. Never heard about the production one.
Pilot stupidity caused the prototype to crash. I saw something on TV and the pilot said "The aircraft did something weird on off, and to try and fix it I pushed the control stick forward hard".
He pushed forward on the control stick right as he passed V2 and had not just his nose gear in the air but the main gear as well...o_O
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AerospacerJ In reply to Russian-Fox [2009-09-23 01:03:08 +0000 UTC]
Heavy metal?
[link] 20 Dec 2004 [w/o] 00-014 00-4014 [USAF] USAF 422 TES F-22A Block 10
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to AerospacerJ [2009-09-23 01:07:12 +0000 UTC]
Sounds like it...
Still, you don't throw the control stick forward when you hit V2 for any reason. V2 is called the "Point of No Return" for a reason.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AerospacerJ In reply to Russian-Fox [2009-09-23 21:30:01 +0000 UTC]
Even if you manage to touch back down you'll still end up skidding along the dirt.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to AerospacerJ [2009-09-24 00:55:07 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, but at V2 you're supposed to make the attempt to get airborne. You should never try to land.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AerospacerJ In reply to Russian-Fox [2009-09-26 03:52:34 +0000 UTC]
Not even the tailhook can bring a plane at V2 down.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lordODonnel [2009-09-20 05:37:54 +0000 UTC]
beautifull. I love that craft, her and her sister.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1