HOME | DD
RyuMakkuro — Omnislash V5 Short Version
Published: 2011-06-07 18:18:31 +0000 UTC; Views: 5753; Favourites: 226; Downloads: 230
Redirect to original
Description
Yeah, and that's what i call Stylish
Short Version and lower resolution, all thanks goes to my PC. Hail 3GB of ram But seriously, when i get myself on extra 1GB or even more (though i don't want to change onto 64-bit system) then a normal resolution from me (500x282) will be given to you. For now only medium which is 300x169.
And of course the full version will be there some day, probably with the day of 4GB in my PC.
Tools used:
- Adobe Photoshop CS5
- Media Player Classic
- FastStone Capture v.6.8
I DO NOT OWN ANYTHING HERE. THE FINAL FANTASY IS COPYRIGHTED BY SQUARE-ENIX. I ONLY MADE THE GIF.
Related content
Comments: 52
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That is the most epic thing I have ever seen!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Huh.. is it just me, or is this different from the original version in the movie?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This is shortened version of Omnislash Version 5 from Advent Children Complete.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
its so awesome! but when i download it, i can watch it only like 2-3sec
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Probably error when downloading, and the file was broken then.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You know what was missing? Having 9999 flash with each hit lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm not that good with animations, and I do like when it's original. Those might be fun, but it's not my style
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not a problem, only a suggestion. But It would be cool if done right ey?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Like I said, it's not in my style. I like it in original way. If there would be 9999 flashes then it would have to be movie, not a gif. At least in my opinion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I've seen some HUUUUGE Gif animations on deviant art before, but usualy they are just a couple of frames. I see what you mean though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This one has almost 600 frames, and I am uploading right now full version of the Omnislash which has over 600 frames (621 if I remember correctly). The sheer number of frames makes it very hard to create high resolution gifs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Obviously, it would take ages to load properly and smoothly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Just loading would be long on this site, but creating it is the harder part for PC. I have 3GB of ram and am not able to do this gif in 500xsomething resolution.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I do only gifs. Don't like much flash and all that. Besides it's better in gif, because it's "smaller" in size. Flash would be bigger in size. But I do all in Photoshop, the quality is good and I don't mind that it's resolution is only this much. No one else has done gifs in this resolution, so I still have the upper hand in resolution
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Do you use layers for animation? Thats how I do it whenever I make a gif, but in gimp.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
In PS, it's more like you use layers for storing things that will be used in animation (for example screenshots) and then simply create frame and hide visibility of those frames that you don't want to see, leaving only the one you want visible. Or if there is no transparency then hide visibility of those that are over the one you want to see. It may sound complicated but it's so easy and boring as hell, that the biggest trouble in making it, is to not get killed from boredom. It's really just copy paste method mostly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Like I said, I've tried it before and yes if its a long animation it gets boring especially if your using external footage from a film using snapshots.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
For gifs I do recommend using Photoshop, even though resolution will be probably lower, but the quality is much much better. It's really clear when you do gifs, that PS is the best graphic program in it's kind. Gimp can't even compare to that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
But its really expensive, have you tried the internet version, is it worth it? I do have PS but I need to re install it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Let's say I have a version from a friend, didn't had to pay for it. But if I would have money I would buy it. Unfortunately I live in a country where the price of most things is not very appropriate to the amount of money normal person gets.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh I see, The thing is that there will always be cheeper (and sometimes free) ways to be productive. Yes Photoshop is of high standards but its highly unlickely one will use all the tools available for their line of work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The same goes for gimp, and every graphic tool there is. If your doing just one type of thing you won't use all tools, but it's the quality of those things you do that matters, and because of that PS is the best. I used gimp myself, but the quality of Photoshop is simply astonishing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
As in the results or the product?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Result and product. PS costs that much because it has a lot of things other programs don't and does all things better than others. That's the truth.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
True, but sometimes being better for having more isnt everything right? Dont get me wrong, its a one heck of a toolkit but it really all depends on the user in the end.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Like I said, Photoshop is better because of quality. Quantity is the second better part, but most important is quality. It really came to while I was making gifs. I couldn't believe how much better they looked.
It's not only the amount, it's more like the quality of that amount. You may use only few of them (like me), but the very tools are better than in any other program. That's the most important thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes I know they are very good tools, but I guess its what one is used to.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's how one do it's job, that's what I'm talking about.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Your masterpiece doesn't want to play at downloading! It is sad!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I suggest you just right-click on this one here and save as...
Easier than that download button for me
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I love this part of the movie. The quality is really good too. Cloud is so cool. >///< I'm glad you made this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I still have to make full version of it, since this is cut from few "cuts" in order to be able to make it even in lower resolution than normally.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
"no hard feelings" (Final Fantasy Dissidia, Cloud's Omnislash v5)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>