Comments: 9
Ryusuta In reply to Antiivvan [2012-09-04 04:40:44 +0000 UTC]
I have to admit, I loved his facepalm (facepaw?) at the end. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lord-Hayati [2012-09-01 05:25:52 +0000 UTC]
the lineart makes this SO much better, I gotta say. Also, It seems you have some new shading, unless I'm going crazy.
^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lord-Hayati In reply to Ryusuta [2012-09-01 05:45:30 +0000 UTC]
I was mainly talking about page 4. You do much better in illuminated scenes.
Yeah, I bet photoshop is like one million times better, although I bet its like 100 times more complcated.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ryusuta In reply to Lord-Hayati [2012-09-01 06:13:08 +0000 UTC]
Thank you; I really appreciate it. Illuminated scenes are both easier and harder. Easier because you don't have to go so in-depth with showing light sources and darkness levels; harder because you have to deal with all the nitty-gritty background objects, deeper perspective, and shadows.
Not sure if anyone noticed, but I kind of tried a little stylistic thing here. If you go back and read through from page 1, the perspective begins totally dark and gradually becomes more visible throughout the four pages; almost as if the viewer's eyes are adjusting to the dark. I thought that was a fun thing to try. and then when the room is actually illuminated, I wanted it to be as much of a shock (no pun intended) as if someone had flicked a switch and turned on the lights in a dark room in real life.
Photoshop IS more complicated than Gimp, but not unbearably so, especially because I had to help me in the transition. I feel like I'm STILL making that transition, as I keep learning really important, helpful, cool new things to try with it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shaprite91 [2012-09-01 05:24:54 +0000 UTC]
lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ryusuta In reply to Shaprite91 [2012-09-01 05:34:23 +0000 UTC]
Is it bad that I giggled out loud when I reread this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1