HOME | DD
Satsurou β QUICK PIC of a fat girl typing
Published: 2009-12-20 11:47:01 +0000 UTC; Views: 87065; Favourites: 526; Downloads: 3382
Redirect to original
Description
Ok, so I was online some hours ago and my friend asked me to create a little avatar for his group: [link] That is Weight Gain Writers Guild.A group for writers... and I am a member? O_o Why not? Go join xD If you're not a writer, you will be able to read so many stories there :>
As I was saying, I was all "Ok!". So I drew one. And then I thought "Why don't I make the girl move some fingers so it may look like she's typing?!". And then I had to learn how to animate in Photoshop >_>
But now I know how to animate, in case I decide to make something more complicated in the future xD
Really simple as I said, took me less than an hour to draw and color, but it works. The problem is that in order to make an avatar, it has to be 100x50, so I had to shrink it and modify it xD Awwww
I decided to post here the original version so this work is not lost
Related content
Comments: 77
π: 2 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 0
Lol, you never know how fat the girl is behind the pc.
π: 0 β©: 1
You find humor in this? Someone who so outright judged an artist for having an overweight model? Listen, kid, I don't know what dope you're smoking but I suggest you get off it. You got a bizarre foreskin fetish and you're a hypocrite.
π: 0 β©: 1
This drawing is humorous yes, by the way it was drawn. As for photos: not all photos posted here have to be adored. If someone doesn't like it and such you have every right to say so.
No, I don't have a foreskin fetish. You assume too much.
YOU are actually the hypocritical retard, little baby.
π: 0 β©: 1
Is that the best you can do, kid? Use my insults and twist them around for yourself? Bro, I don't you realize who you're messing with.
π: 0 β©: 1
Just trying to make it understandable for your lack of intelligence. I told you I'm not your bro. Did you forget already?
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh, sorry, bro. I guess I forgot, bro. I'm a imbecile remember, bro? Does it bother you when I call you "bro," bro? The fact it bothers you is hilarious, bro. Little things seem to stir your worthless brain, huh, bro?
π: 0 β©: 1
Your response proves your lack of intelligence. LMAO!
π: 0 β©: 1
Hmm... no. this r prv lak int kk? Seriously, bro, you going to try and mock a brother's intelligence? You're the one who started shit with me by ranting about foreskin! Bet money you ain't got yours because your parents circumcised you. Big money is that you'll eventually have your own kids circumcised and be like "Oh, I used to be against it and ranted all the time about it blahblahblah." Don't rant about shit when you know you ain't gonna hold up in the future about it.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm not starting dumb ass flame wars like you're doing.
The reply about foreskins was to enlighten the uninformed about the topic.
I got mine 100% natural intact penis.
I'll never support such mutilation of baby's genitalia. It's their body and therefore they have to decide if they want it or not, later in life.
I know you're talking out of your ass as usual though.
π: 0 β©: 1
If you want to inform people about such a stupid subject go to a forum that has that going on. This is a site that appreciates art not penis. Now, fruitbasket, since you have no more ammunition to throw at me. I'll reside but still continue to make fun of your freakish views as that is the American way.
π: 0 β©: 1
It's not a stupid subject. I was replying to someone who said ignorant things.
I know what this site is about douchebag. It's not about all the flaming you keep on doing right here, that's for sure.
You provide no decent arguments whatsoever, with your retarded views, which are not the American way.
π: 0 β©: 1
Since you want to inform people on this subject, kid. Let me throw in my two cents about it and blow your argument away. Balanoposthitis is more likely to happen in uncircumcised males as is HIV, phimosis, paraphimosis, urinary tract infections, bacteremia, meningitis, STDs, and cancer of the penis. The foreskin is a breeding ground for bacteria if not taken care of properly can cause more diseases in these freakish men than normal ones. Studies show there was a 60% decrease in HIV transmission in circumcised males, as well. If you're too dumb to know what those disease are just look them up because you should know what your freakish penis can be infected with, bro. Now unless you got anything good to say in rebuttal to these facts I suggest you just shut the fuck up and cry in the corner.
π: 0 β©: 1
You're spreading a lot of myths in regard to intact penises compared to mutilated/circumcised penises) you retarded kid.
Here's some examples of myths debunked:
Myth β Circumcising baby boys is a safe and harmless procedure.
Fact β As with any surgery, surgically removing part of a baby boy's healthy genitals causes pain, creates immediate health risks and can lead to serious complications. Risks include infection, hemorrhage, scarring, difficulty urinating, loss of part or all of the penis, and even death. More than 100 circumcision-related deaths are estimated to occur every year in the United States, but the number may be even higher. Circumcision complications can and do occur in even the best clinical settings.
Myth β Circumcision is just a little snip.
Fact β Surgically removing part of a baby boy's healthy penis is far more than "a snip." First, a doctor or nurse places the baby on his back, and straps his arms and legs onto a molded plastic board. In the most common method of infant circumcision, the doctor then attaches two hemostats to the foreskin, and inserts a metal instrument under the foreskin to forcibly separate it from the glans (head of the penis). The doctor then slits the foreskin in order to widen its opening for insertion of the circumcision device, against which the foreskin is crushed and then cut off. This operation takes up to fifteen minutes. The amount of skin removed from an infant in a typical circumcision is the equivalent of 15 square inches (the size of a 3 x 5 index card) in an adult male.
Myth β Circumcision is routinely recommended and endorsed by doctors and other health professionals.
Fact β No professional medical association in the United States or anywhere else in the world recommends routine circumcision as a medically necessary procedure. The American Medical Association calls it "non-therapeutic." At no time in its 75 years has the American Academy of Pediatrics ever recommended infant circumcision.
Myth β The baby does not feel any pain during circumcision.
Fact β Circumcision is painful. Babies are sensitive to pain, just like older children and adults. The younger the baby, the more intense the experience of pain. The analgesics used for circumcision only decrease pain; they do not eliminate it. Furthermore, the open wound left by the removal of the foreskin will continue to cause the baby pain and discomfort, especially during urination and defecation, for the 7-10 days it takes for the wound to heal.
Myth β If I don't circumcise my son, he will be ridiculed.
Fact β Times have changed and so has people's understanding of circumcision. Today, half of all baby boys born in the United States will leave the hospital "intact." The circumcision rate is already estimated to be as low as 30% in the Western United States, and the rate across the United States continues to decline as well. Most medically advanced nations do not "routinely" perform surgical operations to remove healthy flesh from newborn babies, and most have laws to protect girls from genital modification. Approximately 75 % of men in the world are not circumcised and remain intact.
Myth β A boy should look like his father. My husband is circumcised, so my son should also be circumcised.
Fact β Children differ from their parents in all kinds of ways, including eye and hair color, body type, and (of course) size and sexual development. If a parent were missing an eye or had a large birthmark, nobody would suggest that the baby's eye be removed at birth, or that he be tattooed with a "birthmark" to look like his parent. If a child asks why his penis looks different from that of his father (or a sibling), parents can offer a simple explanation such as, "Daddy (or brother) had a part of his penis removed when he was a baby, but now we know itβs not necessary and we decided not to let anyone do that to you."
Myth β Routine circumcision of baby boys cannot be compared to Female Genital Mutilation, either as a cultural or medical practice. Female genital cutting is an unjust and inhumane practice, but circumcising boys is justifiable.
Fact β The rationales offered in cultures that promote female genital cutting are similar to those offered in cultures that promote male circumcision. These include hygiene, disease prevention, improved appearance of the genitalia, and social acceptance. Whatever the rationale, forced removal of healthy genital tissue from any child β male or female β is unethical. Boys have the same right as girls to be spared this inhumane, unnecessary surgery.
Myth β To oppose male circumcision is religious and cultural bigotry.
Fact β Many who oppose the painful, risky and permanent alteration of babies' or children's genitalia do so precisely because they believe in universal human rights. People of many different religious and cultural traditions agree that all children β regardless of race, ethnicity, or culture of origin β have the right to be protected from bodily harm. In our society, parents have the right to raise their children in accordance with their own cultural and religious standards. However, that right is not limitless. Parents must not (directly, or through the agency of a medical or religious practitioner) inflict irreversible harm on a child.
Myth β Circumcising newborn baby boys produces health benefits in later life.
Fact β Despite common perception, there is NO conclusive link between circumcision and better health. In fact, performing medically unnecessary surgery on a baby boy's genitals creates immediate health risks. Circumcision-related risks include infection, hemorrhage, scarring, loss of part or all of the penis, and even death. These dangers exist in even the best clinical settings.
Myth β Male circumcision helps prevent HIV.
Fact β Only abstinence or the use of condoms can prevent the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS. Moreover, condom usage protects women as well as men. Even if circumcision were effective for preventing disease, removing part of a baby boy's penis at birth to prevent the potential for disease in the future makes no more sense than "routinely" removing healthy gall bladders at birth to prevent the potential for gall stones in later life, or removing healthy teeth to prevent dental caries.
[link]
π: 0 β©: 1
Nice copy and pasting. Try and at least seem original with your facts, dumb ass.
π: 0 β©: 1
Copy and paste is good enough. Check that site if you want to learn more. Retarded mother fucker.
π: 0 β©: 1
Retarded motherfucker? Sorry that you're more prone to disease. Hope you get cancer of the penis you sick piece of trash. If you get it done as a baby it is just easier to handle without remembering. Also just because you're uncircumcised doesn't mean you feel more pleasure. Studies show that there is not significant change in either side. That is all your argument is! Just shit about the baby... fuck babies, I hate 'em. And one thing I bet is that you're against abortion, too. But I'm just going to ignore you now seeing as all you provide me with is "pain" which really isn't a credible argument without substantial evidence. But the fact that the uncircumcised are more vulnerable to disease is so easily backed and more valid pain for those being circumcised.
π: 0 β©: 1
Nope, I just debunked all your false information about butchered penises aka circumcised compared to all natural 100% intact penis with foreskin. It's very easy to clean it, btw but you're probably too lazy to even bother if you had a normal penis.
Feel free to read up again on the facts here [link]
What you need to know...
- No national or international medical association recommends routine circumcision.
- Only the USA circumcises the majority of newborn boys without medical or religious reason.
- Medicalized circumcision began during the 1800s to prevent masturbation, which was believed to cause disease.
- Today's parents are learning that the foreskin is a normal, protective, functioning organ.
- Today's parents realize circumcision harms and has unnecessary risks.
- Circumcision denies a male's right to genital integrity and choice for his own body.
And here:
[link]
oCirc of Minnesota is a branch of the National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers, which is a 501(c)(3) non-profit educational organization committed to securing the birthright of male and female children to keep their sexual organs intact.
We oppose medically unnecessary circumcisions, especially those performed on an unconsenting infant.
We are committed to providing educational information about infant male circumcision and proper intact (uncircumcised) care.
And here: [link]
Quite a number of famous child care experts and doctors recommend against circumcision in their books. Dr. Dean Edell has expressed oposition against infant cirumcision for at least 15 years now. Sheila Kitzinger very emphatically recommends that parents leave their sons intact. Dr. Lendon Smith goes into detail explaining the foreskinβs purposes and giving all the reasons why circumcision should not be performed. Dr. Spock, in his most recent book, stated βI feel that thereβs no solid medical evidence at this time to support routine circumcision.β He recommends βleaving the foreskin the way Nature meant it to be.β Penelope Leach also recommends against routine circumcision. Click here to see the list of their books.
Booya in your face ignorant retard.
π: 0 β©: 1
You really gotta learn to stop copy and pasting, kid. Learn to summarize your work if you ever even want to sound professional. And I'm no ignorant retard, bigot. I just have a different view that is much healthier for normal males in the long run.
[link]
[link]
All the evidence I need without excessive need to repeat myself on "human integrity rights" and all that hippy bullshit. While you use all Pro-Uncircumcised sites I use sites that list both sides of the case. You need to learn not to be a one-sided bigot, kid. I'm done here and proven my point. Now unless you want to get destroyed in the argument of Abortion then I highly suggest you walk away with your tail between your legs and go clean your dick.
π: 0 β©: 1
You just keep on flaming and repeating your bogus arguments which I have debunked several times by now.
Go waste someone else's time, you uber retard.
π: 0 β©: 1
Really? Kid, please. I'll be the bigger man and end this shit. You haven't debunked anything. Now just go away, troll.
π: 0 β©: 1
You've been acting like a kid all the time. No doubt it took you so long to end your flaming, with your false arguments that come out of your ass which I already debunked several times. LMAO retard.
π: 0 β©: 0
hmmm,i wonder how she would have lookd with glasses.lol
π: 0 β©: 1
Nerdier, somehow
Which is something good in my book xD
π: 1 β©: 1
i agree,nerdier woman are awesome,a nerdy BBW? that's the PERFECT woman in my book.
π: 0 β©: 0
i love it,i wish she was on my computer typing,i would slowly watch her,and take in her beauty.^_^ great work!
π: 0 β©: 0
Excellent job on this animation. 
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanks! 
π: 0 β©: 0
Couldn't have asked for a better logo!
You've been amazing with all your works lately and I hope you keep up the good work!
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm glad you liked it GU
π: 0 β©: 0
The effects are actually pretty neat, like the light flashing on the face and the shadow on the arm changing. Pretty good for imageready
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you
I've been thinking about learning how to use Flash, but never got into doing that :-/
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm glad you think that ^_^
π: 0 β©: 1
oh awesome! Can you show me or tell me how its done? ^^
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanks
Of course, in Photoshop open the "animation" window, then treat each layer as a different frame
π: 0 β©: 0
good animation.I also like the fat girl
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanks
π: 0 β©: 0
Thanks!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>