HOME | DD

secondlina — Chillaxing Brony

Published: 2012-02-27 01:23:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 1894; Favourites: 35; Downloads: 33
Redirect to original
Description There’s this outrage that seems to be going around about the character of Ditzy Hooves, referred to by fans as ‘Derpy’ (which may or may not be a canon name now). This is, so to speak, my opinion on the whole affair. Now, please keep in mind two things while reading this - I am very inactive in the fandom, for starters. It’s a bit too big and aggressive for me. I prefer to share my pony squee with a couple of friends and my brother, who is quite the brony. Second, I don’t have any knowledge of what the fandom decided ‘Derpy’ was like. All I knew about her until I saw her in the Winter Wrap-up episode and the Round-up episode is that she was some kind of gray animation glitch people had fallen in love with (which is cute).

When I heard Derpy had spoken in the round up episode, I got very curious. This was a character that fans had fallen in love with and I was wondering how the creation team was going to handle her to make the fans happy. When I saw her scene, i’m not going to lie… I though all the fans were going to be hurt by the portrayal. Now, this has nothing to do with the fact that the portrayal may or may not be offensive (though like many, I do think it might have been). To me, ‘Derpy’ sounded just like we do when we imitate someone we dislike in a conversation. You know… This sort of thing : ‘God my boss is so evil. I tried to do what she asked and then she was all like Durrrr no I dunno’.

So… Yeah. I pretty much froze and though to myself ‘man, the fans are going to be mad about this’. I was surprised when I saw that not only a lot of fans were happy with the potrayal, but actually trashed people that questionned it’s validity as a representation of the disabled. Okay. Let’s pause for a second.

I love this show because the ponies have personalities that don’t fit in a stereotypical little mold. You THINK the ponies all represent a ‘type’ of person, and then you learn that they don’t. Just like people, they are multi-faceted. And I found that this wasn’t done with ‘Derpy’. Let’s forget for a second that she may represent a disabled character, as many fans believe. Even without that, she was the ‘Ditzy’ one and was given a voice that fits this negative idea that silly people are annoying and are clumsy because they don’t especially care. Why? Why give her a voice that is so stereotype-ish? In fact, why not break our expectations like they did with Luna by having her voice have a strong and interesting dissonance with her actions? Everyone expected Luna to be meek. She totally wasn’t. Why not give ‘Derpy’ a classy and eloquent voice. Maybe there’s a scientific reason she’s so (please excuse the expression) ‘Derpy’. Like, she brought the birds back from the wrong cardical direction because of science. SCIENCE.

Heck, why even give her a voice at all? One cannot forget the power of the pantomime, especially in such a well-animated show. People feel in love with a silent character, and I actually liked her as a silent character. She was adroable in the winter wrap-up, flying around. A couple of days ago, on the subway platform, I saw a girl dancing. Dancing like a kid. She was twirling a little gracefully, a little clumsily and very, very close to the edge of the platform (I worried about her safety). I didnt know this girl, but I knew right away that she was eccentric, in a good mood and adorable. And she didn’t say a word or even hum. Pantomime. It’s powerful. It can create a full personality without words.

So generally, my opinion is that the portrayal was weak. Animators were too motivated to please the fans (bless them for that though) and didn’t really think on how they could push the character. They just adopted this common potrayal that was lying around the internet. I do hope the animators still lisend to the fans in the future, but do it carefully. Because not all the fans are experts in storytelling. And honestly, stuff that achieves internet meme status is rarely intelligent enough to be classified as compelling storytelling. So yes. Be attentive.

Generally, i’d like to conclude that i’m glad they changed her voice. Because they first was a weak character portrayal. And maybe even potentially offensive to many. MLP : FIM promotes difference, tolerance and originality. So we should have characters that reflect this. I still think they should have left her silent and avoided all this. Kept her as a fun little silent background easter egg, but what are you going to do? Such is life. And the internet is prone to exploding.

Oh, also, a lot of people are giving a certain webcomic artist trash because she would have apparently caused the downfall of the first, odd ‘Derpy’ portrayal. Please stop, guys. First, because telling someone to die over an animated show is really not the message of love and tolerance Pincess Celestia wants you to learn.

Second, really? Really? Guys. Webcomic artists don’t have that much power. If we did, i’d already be crowned queen of a small country. Yamino is aimed and fired at because she’s big in the fandom and known on the internet. But in the Hasbro offices, outside of the internet, I don’t think she has enough power to, as you seem to say, ‘ruin the show’. She just voiced an opinion, as I did now.
Related content
Comments: 17

IchibanVictory [2012-02-27 20:09:51 +0000 UTC]

I hate to break it to you, but even her name, "Ditzy," has negative connotations. In short, she's been pegged as a silly/stupid/clumsy character before she was ever given the fan name for her, which really implies the same thing. Not being into the fandom at all, I didn't care one way or another about her portrayal since it fit her name. Then again, I grew up on cartoons where characters were given names according to how they behaved. (Hello, Snow White and the Seven Dwarves...)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

secondlina In reply to IchibanVictory [2012-02-28 02:49:17 +0000 UTC]

Fans are the ones that decided she was the "ditzy/stupid/clumsy" one though. Originally, she was just a background error. So all her development was due to writers being influenced by fandom.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IchibanVictory In reply to secondlina [2012-02-29 10:11:10 +0000 UTC]

It wasn't hard for fans to see her like that since the animators messed up her eyes in the first place...but in short, the brony fandom scares me, and I prefer to avoid it. Bad enough some of the guys in my gaming group are hardcore bronies. -_-

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

secondlina In reply to IchibanVictory [2012-02-29 22:05:10 +0000 UTC]

I have a few friendly fans in my entourage. That's god enough for me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Knaishia-Paloma [2012-02-27 12:46:49 +0000 UTC]

I think I actually love you for this./creeper
The whole 'derpy' fiasco makes me seriously dislike this fandom. Love the show, but the louder fans are pretty rude. Between Ditzy Hooves and the racism I'm glad I tend to stay out of it.
I really love how well you expressed your opinions on the matter and this drawing is friggin adorable

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

secondlina In reply to Knaishia-Paloma [2012-02-28 02:47:54 +0000 UTC]

A yes. The racism. I remember seeing those "Why are people drawing Fluttershy as a muslim". Horrifying stuff. I can't believe the stuff some people would dare to say.

I know there's a lot of cool fans out there, but there's a lot of really scary and odd ones too. I try to keep my nose out of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Knaishia-Paloma In reply to secondlina [2012-02-28 12:34:11 +0000 UTC]

That's the risk of any big fandom. Especially the ones dominated by men. (From one I've seen the women-dominated fandoms tend to scream about ships more than racist stuff)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

secondlina In reply to Knaishia-Paloma [2012-02-28 16:10:52 +0000 UTC]

As much as I love the whole "MLP brings in boys and girls of all ages" (which breaks socal conventions), i'm a little irritated by the louder and nastier breed of bronies who seem to love to take control.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

brensey [2012-02-27 05:03:15 +0000 UTC]

That drawing is just adorable. And the write up was great, too! I pretty much agree with everything you said regarding this fiasco.
I never knew about the web-comic author getting blame and even death threats because some idiots actually think that a web-comic artist has enough power to sway a large, multi-million dollar corporation. Seriously, that's just disgusting!

The way I see it, bringing Derpy out of the background was bound to piss SOMEBODY off no matter how the show's creative team handled it. Fanon portrayals of her are all over the place (I've heard Time Lord, single mother, genius, normal pony who just has wonky eyes, a pony that is so retarded she can barely function, etc). People have gotten so attached to their respective fanons that it would have been impossible for Hasbro to please everyone. Hell, her NAME wasn't even set in stone within the fandom (since Faust herself has said that she considered naming her Ditzy Doo, a lot of fans latched onto that name).

Bless their hearts, the show's producers just wanted to send a love-letter to their fans. It's too bad it ended up back-firing on them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

secondlina In reply to brensey [2012-02-28 02:46:02 +0000 UTC]

Indeed. I'm really happy they try so hard, but it sucks when it turns out this way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Taigan [2012-02-27 04:27:11 +0000 UTC]

See I didn't mind Derpy's presentation. But I did expect them to follow it up with an episode that would show us more of her. Keeping her as a one-dimensional joke character (as you pointed out) wouldn't really fit the mood of the show.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

secondlina In reply to Taigan [2012-02-27 04:44:32 +0000 UTC]

Indeed. Do something worth while with a character, or just don't do anything.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

earthstar [2012-02-27 03:41:33 +0000 UTC]

I liked it better when Derpy was a silent background character that just loved to pop up out of nowhere. My biggest problem when they had called her Derpy was that I just didn't think it was appropriate for a kids show. Had it been a show for adults like Family Guy, The Simpsons, etc, I wouldn't have bat an eye, but for a kids show it's uncomfortable and make it an easy target for over protective/sensitive parents.

Anyway, you do bring up a good point about her potraya. It would have been really funny and awesome if they had given her a voice we weren't expecting, like an elegant lady or a genius pony who is just really clumsy. That would have been great.

Also, very cute drawing. ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

brensey In reply to earthstar [2012-02-27 05:13:48 +0000 UTC]

I thought having her be the show's "Where's Waldo" was the perfect amount of fan-service. It gave the hard-core Bronies something to hunt down in each episode; but it didn't interfere with the show or any of it's storylines. And it allowed the fans who loved the character stick with whatever name and back story they liked for her. Giving her a set-in-stone name and personality was just bound to alienate someone no matter how well the creative team handled it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

secondlina In reply to earthstar [2012-02-27 04:45:14 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, a couple of people defended their position on the derpy issue by saying "Family guy does stuff like this, so we can too!" But family guy is a bad, bad, bad example of tolerance.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brensey In reply to secondlina [2012-02-27 07:09:21 +0000 UTC]

Family Guy is also a show aimed at adults and immature fratboys. MLP is aimed at little girls. Anyone who thinks those two shows should be treated the same is a dumbass.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

secondlina In reply to brensey [2012-02-28 02:44:36 +0000 UTC]

Agreed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0