Comments: 39
yaboykeilan [2012-06-20 21:54:28 +0000 UTC]
did u keep it it is so awesome
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yaboykeilan In reply to selbbub13 [2012-12-29 00:21:16 +0000 UTC]
awwwww it looks so cute tho
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
slomopoo [2010-01-18 01:21:57 +0000 UTC]
why do people still breed pitbulls? there cute as puppies but when they grow up, they are the #2 most dangerous domestic animal
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
selbbub13 In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 01:23:57 +0000 UTC]
do u know why?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to selbbub13 [2010-01-18 01:25:27 +0000 UTC]
well its in there personality, there by nature more violent then average domestic dogs. its not there fault, thats just the way they are
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Reimann In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 01:30:19 +0000 UTC]
That's just plain silly.
That'd be like saying "Lets let a dangerous animal species die out, because y'know, we raise and breed them to be dangerous."
Every pitbull I have seen has been as sweet as sugar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to Reimann [2010-01-18 01:33:25 +0000 UTC]
you havent seen many then have you. there the #2 MOST dangerous domestic animal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Reimann In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 01:35:54 +0000 UTC]
That doesn't mean anything. An elephant is dangerous cause it can sit on you, but chances of that happening are rare.
The reason they're dubbed as the most dangerous is because people breed specific ones to kill/fight. The ones who aren't bread for that are generally very sweet dogs.
I worked at a pound for a few weeks and most of the dogs that went there were pits, but they were all very very sweet besides maybe one or two.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Reimann In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 01:38:58 +0000 UTC]
: P Again, that doesn't mean anything. Just because a pitbull has the "Capability" to be dangerous doesn't mean it will be 100%.
Read here:
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to Reimann [2010-01-18 01:45:13 +0000 UTC]
so a wild Indian tiger has the "capability" of tearing your arms, but its ok to have one as a house pet because there is not a 100% chance you will get mauled? that makes perfect sense
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Reimann In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 01:46:57 +0000 UTC]
Now you are comparing a wild animal to domestic. These are two totally different things and should be separated as such.
And no, there is pretty much a 100% chance you'll get mauled since you were dumb enough to try and tame an animal from the wild.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to Reimann [2010-01-18 01:49:54 +0000 UTC]
incorect. there are many people who actualy have them as pets. and some were no mauled
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Reimann In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 01:51:55 +0000 UTC]
Then they were likely bred in captivity and not captured from the wild.
Either way, go ahead and keep thinking they'll kill everything they see. I'm getting bored, so bye~ : P
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to Reimann [2010-01-18 01:53:58 +0000 UTC]
Yes! I WON! booya!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
selbbub13 In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 01:28:36 +0000 UTC]
true but its because the fight them they get even more aggressive
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to selbbub13 [2010-01-18 01:31:24 +0000 UTC]
well that happens with any animal. but ones liked these are naturaly more agressive. im not saying to kill them, just for people to stop breeding them
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
selbbub13 In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 01:38:48 +0000 UTC]
wow i have a husky lab mix at home
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to selbbub13 [2010-01-18 01:45:44 +0000 UTC]
but with out the double the worst...is the chewawa lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
selbbub13 In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 01:50:50 +0000 UTC]
i know damn those dogs!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to selbbub13 [2010-01-18 01:53:24 +0000 UTC]
crazy little demons
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to selbbub13 [2010-01-18 02:08:04 +0000 UTC]
speeking of demons [link]
dont know if its real or not, but its sure creepy nontheless
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
selbbub13 In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 02:31:40 +0000 UTC]
OMFG!!! dont send shit like that its to scary
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to selbbub13 [2010-01-18 02:37:54 +0000 UTC]
dont worry, its fake (sorry about that)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
selbbub13 In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 02:43:09 +0000 UTC]
omg thanks god how did u know that
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to selbbub13 [2010-01-18 02:59:58 +0000 UTC]
i am skilled in ditecting computer animation, and that was definatly computer animation
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
selbbub13 In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 04:25:02 +0000 UTC]
ohhhhhhh okay thanks now illm be able to sleep... -shakes- maybe not
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to selbbub13 [2010-01-18 04:40:03 +0000 UTC]
oh crap now i feel bad
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
selbbub13 In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 05:10:55 +0000 UTC]
ehh u didnt know and i watche it not ur fault lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to selbbub13 [2010-01-18 05:17:59 +0000 UTC]
no shouldnt show people that kind of crap. please hit me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
selbbub13 In reply to slomopoo [2010-01-18 21:31:29 +0000 UTC]
naw most ppl like it when i do that it has no affect lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slomopoo In reply to selbbub13 [2010-01-18 22:33:52 +0000 UTC]
oh, ok but still.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Reimann [2010-01-18 01:21:33 +0000 UTC]
Lovely! What a beautiful dog!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
selbbub13 In reply to Reimann [2010-01-18 01:23:25 +0000 UTC]
i know!!!!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0