Comments: 37
keelan12345 [2017-12-15 07:52:02 +0000 UTC]
is the one in the top-left the she-hulk?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sephzero In reply to keelan12345 [2017-12-15 15:11:34 +0000 UTC]
Naw, just different coloration examples of Hydes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
keelan12345 In reply to Sephzero [2017-12-15 17:02:17 +0000 UTC]
alright. (through, it would be interesting to see a "Hyde" version of she-hulk!)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sephzero In reply to keelan12345 [2017-12-15 18:03:29 +0000 UTC]
All depends on which kind of She-Hulk.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
keelan12345 In reply to Sephzero [2017-12-16 03:36:27 +0000 UTC]
jen walters. (seeing how she seems to already have the characteristics of a "hyde"!)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sephzero In reply to keelan12345 [2017-12-16 04:24:33 +0000 UTC]
Well lot of takes on her and hulk forms too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sephzero In reply to keelan12345 [2017-12-17 02:59:57 +0000 UTC]
So which aspect to capture the best for her disparate Hyde form.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
keelan12345 In reply to Sephzero [2017-12-17 12:18:04 +0000 UTC]
honestly, use the animated series version! (where Jen was a bit reserved about her appearance and was a bit lazy. which then changed when she turned into the she-hulk! where that version would show off her sexy side! (also, the best way of making that one a bit interesting is to have them be STUCK in their hyde form! because she subconsciously WANTS to be a hyde!)
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Brandy2542 [2017-07-27 19:08:23 +0000 UTC]
wow
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brandy2542 In reply to Sephzero [2017-07-27 21:51:41 +0000 UTC]
Not really, but the start is good
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sephzero In reply to Brandy2542 [2017-07-27 21:52:43 +0000 UTC]
See the conclusion soon enough.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brandy2542 In reply to Sephzero [2017-07-28 04:06:44 +0000 UTC]
I saw it and it is good
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rob3rt95 [2017-07-26 21:26:15 +0000 UTC]
She will kick her asses...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sephzero In reply to Rob3rt95 [2017-07-26 21:34:00 +0000 UTC]
Be a lot of beating going around.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
StoneMan85 [2017-07-26 04:17:07 +0000 UTC]
Awesome start of a TF
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sephzero In reply to StoneMan85 [2017-07-26 21:13:14 +0000 UTC]
Needed an interesting reason to get her to change in such a formal setting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StoneMan85 In reply to Sephzero [2017-07-26 21:55:44 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm. Wonder what reason that would be.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sephzero In reply to StoneMan85 [2017-07-26 23:13:17 +0000 UTC]
Mess up a bunch of people toying with things best avoided.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Venjix5 [2017-07-25 19:42:05 +0000 UTC]
That's cruel.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sephzero In reply to Venjix5 [2017-07-25 20:33:06 +0000 UTC]
That it is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
thelordofthemachines [2017-07-25 10:04:28 +0000 UTC]
Why do I feel like she's talking to us?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Zigs-Lotheon [2017-07-24 23:54:10 +0000 UTC]
Hmm I get the feeling Cheryl should have been called in as backup
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sephzero In reply to Zigs-Lotheon [2017-07-24 23:58:13 +0000 UTC]
There be a bit too much excessive experimenting if that was the case.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zigs-Lotheon In reply to Sephzero [2017-07-25 02:22:20 +0000 UTC]
I thought she was brains AND brawn
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sephzero In reply to Zigs-Lotheon [2017-07-25 02:27:50 +0000 UTC]
Brawn is keeping the subject still while the research is being done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zigs-Lotheon In reply to Sephzero [2017-07-25 05:03:50 +0000 UTC]
If she uses straps tables I'd say it would make for effective submission to get the formula out of their system
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sephzero In reply to Zigs-Lotheon [2017-07-25 09:59:05 +0000 UTC]
Well, she be experimenting and testing on the limits of what that knock-off formula does in the system.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1