HOME | DD

shadow2007x In reply to tophxomi [2016-04-08 23:04:12 +0000 UTC]

n.n

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tophxomi In reply to shadow2007x [2016-04-08 23:05:54 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shadow2007x In reply to Jax1776 [2014-01-08 15:36:48 +0000 UTC]

jaja thx n.n

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

limpo10 In reply to MountainKing417 [2012-09-06 05:32:45 +0000 UTC]

XD epic comment lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thebloodreaver In reply to NewMclovin [2011-11-12 17:27:42 +0000 UTC]

... why?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NewMclovin In reply to thebloodreaver [2011-11-14 01:15:03 +0000 UTC]

What the-? XD Well OK just JUMP right in to the conversation why don't you??

>..< My friend, I'm a chick, ok? As MUCH as I just love underwear shots, VERY sarcastic btw, this just doesn't impress me. I know I know.. don't judge an Artist by one art piece... but someone else even commented on another piece of art by this guy... and well it was rather close to "lolly art" I think is what you call it... but I let it go then. I thought well... nothing was ACTUALLY showing, so just let it go... NOT in this one... >..>'

And to, she was a FRESHMEN in the series which means this is kind of like "lolli art" which I am totally against. I just don't think underwear shots like this... are very ... cool?

Don't worry, I'm not condoning him OR you for liking or drawing this... it just isn't my style

I need to tell him... I just haven't translated it into Spanish which thank you for reminding me... I'm going to do that right now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thebloodreaver In reply to NewMclovin [2011-11-14 16:50:44 +0000 UTC]

I see your point, but you need to realize that alot of artists that take the anime style tend to do the "pantsu" shots with "cute" characters whenever the chance calls for it, more or less for the sake of "Rule of Cute/Sexy". If you take a look around, in images around the site or the entire internet, or even just look at conventional anime, "cute" characters (generally female) tend to have a "pantsu" moment snuck in. That's not to say American characters are totally safe from "pantsu" moments, but those moments are usually reserved for "Rule of Funny" situations rather than cute or sexy.

Also, when it comes to "loli art", this particular image is WAY too far away from being classified as that. I understand your concern, but there is a difference between making a younger character look cute, and being full out perverted. And, so i end with the question. Does this image look full out perverted to you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NewMclovin In reply to thebloodreaver [2011-11-15 01:39:36 +0000 UTC]

Ok... whoa whoa whoa. XD Sorry dude, but uh... I never said full on pervy I said "Looks close to loli art" not just like it. close. I DID look up Lolicon, the actual word, and yes I was wrong my friend. Lolicon refers to child porn. I still do consider this close to child porn though XDD She isn't an adult and in my country, taking snapshots of children in there undergarments is a federal offense. I'm PRETTY sure... though I could be wrong on that one.. >..>

ANYWAYS, MY question is... what do YOU think of this art? Do you think it's cute that it practically outlines her flippin vagina?? >...> If you do?? Then we just have to agree to disagree my friend x3

Do I take this to heart? No! There are TONS of people in the MLaaTR community who draw this and enjoy this. I don't care, it's your life, live it how you please. But I don't need THIS popping up in my Da watch list so I just... unwatch. I still respect the guy, his art is 10 times better than mine. ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thebloodreaver In reply to NewMclovin [2011-11-15 05:43:26 +0000 UTC]

Ok.

BTW, to answer your question "what do YOU think of this art?", i personally think it's a little too fan-servicey for me. While i will agree that the "human" body can be seen as a work of art, this particular image is, as i've said, more for the "rule of cute/sexy", and it's attempt to emphasize the genitalia of the character doesn't bring forth artistic merit... again, that's not to say that this image isn't well done, but the pantsu could have been done without.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NewMclovin In reply to thebloodreaver [2011-11-23 15:05:24 +0000 UTC]

mmk... I think we ended up back at point one. you think the pantsu could have been done without.. XD So you agree with me... correct?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thebloodreaver In reply to NewMclovin [2011-11-23 18:28:09 +0000 UTC]

Again, in this case, it has no real artistic merit, so yes, it could have been done without.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NewMclovin In reply to thebloodreaver [2011-11-23 18:50:52 +0000 UTC]

You know you don't have to use so many fancy words my friend... XD You agree with me, why did you make it such a point to get onto me in the first place then??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thebloodreaver In reply to NewMclovin [2011-11-26 06:03:37 +0000 UTC]

The point that i was trying to make was that he is indeed a good artist and you shouldn't de-watch him just because he has a certain... "preference". If you don't like something that he posts, simply delete it, and keep the rest. Eh?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NewMclovin In reply to thebloodreaver [2011-11-26 16:03:30 +0000 UTC]

Look, please just stop. Ok? I already said that yes I try to look past most of it... but this was the final straw.. That's just the kind of artist he IS... just like 14-bis.. I don't plan on watching him either... I respect your theory saying that I should just delete it... but no. It's my choice and I just have no desire for this and I know this isn't the last time he'll post it so I don't need to wast time "fishing" through the filth just to find what I want... ^.^' thank you but ... just no.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thebloodreaver In reply to NewMclovin [2011-11-26 19:17:25 +0000 UTC]

*shrug* alright.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0