HOME | DD

Silas-Coldwine β€” Our world, 2020

#alternatehistory #history #maps
Published: 2020-01-31 23:42:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 4940; Favourites: 57; Downloads: 15
Redirect to original
Description I could make this a periodic tradition. Unless online formats change, I die or the world ends, whatever happens first.
Related content
Comments: 33

RomeoNovemberMike [2022-03-03 20:57:17 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Silas-Coldwine In reply to RomeoNovemberMike [2022-03-03 21:30:12 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

BrutalityInc [2020-06-01 06:37:22 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KingsofWinter [2020-02-22 21:05:44 +0000 UTC]

Nice, you should check out my own map. I feel like we took a very different approach from one another.Β 

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Silas-Coldwine In reply to KingsofWinter [2020-02-22 23:56:45 +0000 UTC]

I like it *a lot*. Nice touch with the quarantined areas in China, I'm thinking of including something similar here. I guess your approach is more focused on the big play of polar blocs, while mine tries a more localized scope. I also, partly because simple appeals to my laziness, try not to directly outline contenders in a war unless they represent actual nations with functioning state structures, a label that might be contentious by itself.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

KingsofWinter In reply to Silas-Coldwine [2020-02-23 00:52:17 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, and your correct in guessing my approach was to more accurately depict major power blocs and spheres of influence.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Artist-64 [2020-02-21 22:23:30 +0000 UTC]

What a dystopia amirite

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Silas-Coldwine In reply to The-Artist-64 [2020-02-22 01:23:05 +0000 UTC]

Not the best of possible worlds. At least I hope so.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Artist-64 In reply to Silas-Coldwine [2020-06-15 22:57:26 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Silas-Coldwine In reply to The-Artist-64 [2020-06-16 12:55:58 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Artist-64 In reply to Silas-Coldwine [2020-06-16 13:13:12 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Silas-Coldwine In reply to The-Artist-64 [2020-06-16 12:27:11 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RvBOMally [2020-02-20 17:29:32 +0000 UTC]

What a shitty world.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Silas-Coldwine In reply to RvBOMally [2020-02-20 20:02:08 +0000 UTC]

Right?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

J-Roge1 [2020-02-16 16:54:08 +0000 UTC]

I must say, I find this very implausible.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Silas-Coldwine In reply to J-Roge1 [2020-02-24 00:03:01 +0000 UTC]

Me too...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

spleak334 [2020-02-12 20:10:35 +0000 UTC]

Why is chile a core country?Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Silas-Coldwine In reply to spleak334 [2020-02-24 00:24:25 +0000 UTC]

Systems theory as it is is very tentative, in my opinion. For example, a semi-peripheral country can act as a peripheral coutry for other countries, and commercial volume and development seem to randomly matter more in some countries than in others as long as they perpetuate the idea of a fixed north-south divide by other means. Now, I'm not saying I do my job better than sociologists who do proper research, but what I tried to convey with the idea of "core countries" was the political-economic intertwinement of most highly developed, industrial countries -that is, excluding those that are geopolitically/economically more distant from the bulk. So, on practical terms, "Core countries" means direct participants of the Western geopolitical-economic complex with two main traits: Very high HDI and an industrialized economy. Let's see Chile. Very high HDI, check. Industrialized economy, check. It could be argued that Argentina and Uruguay are Core then, but you see that their geopolitical closeness to Brazil, neither geopolitically integrated in the Core nor very high in terms of development, excludes that cathegory.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Silas-Coldwine In reply to Silas-Coldwine [2021-07-03 11:12:48 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

procrastination777 [2020-02-07 00:20:21 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Silas-Coldwine In reply to procrastination777 [2020-02-07 12:33:04 +0000 UTC]

Id rather not. It's too implausible, and efforts at making it plausible have been made already, and anything I could come up with would be redundant.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

QuantumBranching [2020-02-03 05:40:09 +0000 UTC]

Depressing, ain't it?Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Silas-Coldwine In reply to QuantumBranching [2020-02-03 10:43:21 +0000 UTC]

Making it made it look less depressing than it was in my head, but still, yeah.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TrueBananakonda [2020-02-02 23:50:10 +0000 UTC]

You may as well add a "Nat-Populist Wave" to Germany, it's getting there there too

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Silas-Coldwine In reply to TrueBananakonda [2020-02-03 00:31:36 +0000 UTC]

As a rule of thumb, I've only included places where it solidly and lastingly enforces policies at a national level. If it were because of presence in one way or another or because of local influence, virtually the whole world would have that indicator.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Meerkat92 [2020-02-02 21:22:58 +0000 UTC]

What is that thing in the middle of the national populist logo? It looks like a plow.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Silas-Coldwine In reply to Meerkat92 [2020-02-02 21:47:22 +0000 UTC]

It's supposed to be a wave, but it's hard to draw one and/or I'm not skilled enough to make pixel figures in that scsle.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dain-Siegfried [2020-02-02 03:52:41 +0000 UTC]

If you really wanted to ham it up you could add the coronavirus as a bunch of horizontal lines on Wuhan and surrounds, the classic 'this area's fucked' pattern. Great map, regardless.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Silas-Coldwine In reply to Dain-Siegfried [2020-02-02 06:46:38 +0000 UTC]

I really though about it, might still do it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AlexanderBranza [2020-01-31 23:52:08 +0000 UTC]

Es curioso ver el mundo como en uno de los tΓ­picos mapas de historia alternativa. ΒΏNo consideras a Bolivia como parte de la oleada Nat-Pop? La nueva presidenta se parece bastante a Bolsanaro por lo poco que he visto.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Silas-Coldwine In reply to AlexanderBranza [2020-02-01 00:22:35 +0000 UTC]

Al final he dedidido incluir a Bolivia aprovechando que querΓ­a hacer algunos cambios

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Silas-Coldwine In reply to AlexanderBranza [2020-01-31 23:59:52 +0000 UTC]

SΓ­ que me lo parece, pero al ser una presidencia interina, no sabΓ­a quΓ© hacer. Algo parecido me ha pasado con Israel. ΒΏSigue el Likud o hay traspaso de poder? En circunstancias muy burbujeantes he preferido no tocar nada.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatrickMontreal In reply to Silas-Coldwine [2020-02-01 04:18:24 +0000 UTC]

En Israel por el momento no hay gobierno, pero Netanyahu del Likud es aΓΊn Primer Ministro. En Marzo hay elecciones y los dos principales competidores son Netanyahu (Likud) y Gantz (Kajlo Lavan). No son tan distintos ideolΓ³gicamente en realidad.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0