Comments: 28
gdpr-4925336 [2014-02-10 22:28:51 +0000 UTC]
Great pose, very very beautiful shot !!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Novastorm73 [2010-02-10 20:09:15 +0000 UTC]
Stunning beauty.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
thecnacosvik [2009-03-07 00:29:20 +0000 UTC]
Mium...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
stns [2007-06-29 16:07:40 +0000 UTC]
Awesome pose and expression.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
danielalfa [2007-06-21 00:42:22 +0000 UTC]
Great pick!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
heliotropium [2007-06-16 12:18:52 +0000 UTC]
I like this how
it are. A very
beautiful shoot.
Congratulations!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RisandiVon [2007-06-13 03:27:54 +0000 UTC]
nice shot very clean. i like the model's pose.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
carmenmayta [2007-06-12 01:32:19 +0000 UTC]
amazing...so beautiful
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IElioI [2007-06-10 20:43:59 +0000 UTC]
Masterpiece!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gdpr-1852128 [2007-06-10 15:18:44 +0000 UTC]
completely blown away
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Clee-Hill [2007-06-09 10:42:36 +0000 UTC]
Superb work - a relaxed pose with an indulgent eye on the viewer - sweet tones too
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tvadakia [2007-06-09 00:43:48 +0000 UTC]
She doesn't have a clue as to what she portrays. She's lazy in her sexuality... let a man take her, if he's up to the task.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Che-Gue-Petey [2007-06-09 00:26:58 +0000 UTC]
lucky bugger, we photojournalists cant afford the time to use film
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sim4nee In reply to Che-Gue-Petey [2007-06-09 09:28:38 +0000 UTC]
I didn't process myself, I used C41 processed b/w film and had them collected by a friend.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Che-Gue-Petey In reply to sim4nee [2007-06-09 20:11:41 +0000 UTC]
still, war correspondent work, just dont have that luxury, plus, ive never been able to trust others with my film. the whole robert capa/d-day debacle.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
technofibre [2007-06-08 22:51:32 +0000 UTC]
Absolutely stunning...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sim4nee In reply to number2express [2007-06-09 09:42:09 +0000 UTC]
It wasn't a mistake, the film was overlapped with the next frame and that was the closest I can avoid cropping too much. No right nor wrong in photography anyway my friend. All the photography book and photography expert suggested do not shoot towards the light, use soft light for portraits not harsh light but I did both "mistake" anyway. Sometime you just have to shoot, forget about what you learn in photography, and decided if you like the photos later.
Long live Lubitel!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sim4nee In reply to number2express [2007-06-09 16:03:31 +0000 UTC]
Then the legs were cropped too, bad!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
number2express In reply to sim4nee [2007-06-09 20:58:43 +0000 UTC]
ummm.. well, if I were doing shot like this, I'd probably cut the legs and arms a bit closer to the body, but it may be an individual thing, right?
Or maybe not, 'cuz the head would've been cut as well. This is a hard position, as I think of it now.
Maybe I was too fast with my opinion, but these goddamn arms were the first thing I've noticed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
alexsolaris [2007-06-08 17:43:24 +0000 UTC]
the body spreads the skin, and it's light...not naked, but open...it's talking...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0