HOME | DD
Simonetry — Jared
#stryx #dracostryx
Published: 2017-01-19 01:28:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 224; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
stryx; Jared 1829forgot to upload this, /w\;
Related content
Comments: 20
God your art is gorgeous!
I'd love to grab some Stryx art from you eventually c:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aaa thank you!! :'Dc <3
and tha's rly cool man, B')
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Everything about this is really good, excepting that tail. That tail bothers me. Bird tails don't bend like that. That is a very broken tail you have drawn there, sir.
Other than that, it's a pretty bird with pretty colours, and the shading is way nicer than anything I could do. Nice work. *applauds*
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
It's a Draco Stryx. Aka a dragon/bird.
"Draco Stryx can be described as bird-like, flying theropods, with ancestry tied back to dinosaurs. It is clear that they convergently evolved alongside birds, and so share many similarities since they both share a common ancestor. They share most of their similarities with the raptor family, or "birds of prey," as well as dinosaurian raptors, like Deinonychus and Archaeopteryx. Sapeornis also serves as a useful skeletal reference to the bone structures of Draco Stryx."
Find out more about the species here: dracostryx.deviantart.com/jour…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dinosaur are bird tho
like
scientifically speaking
also prehistoric dino more than likely still had rigid tails
so uh
do ur fuckin research next time, k?
do u even paleontology bro
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
There is no need to be rude. I was just giving you more info on the species.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And your info was unnecessary. Unneeded. Sure, I could've explained my position in a more calm and rational manner, but where's the fun in that?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
There was still no need to respond like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're right. There wasn't. There was also no need not to respond like that. Your point is...?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Respond like what? Giving you some extra info on the Stryx? I saw you were a new user and thought you'd want to know. Guess I was wrong, oh well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I wasn't referring to how you responded, I was referring to how I responded, in response to your response to my response. There was nothing wrong with you linking me the species information under the assumption that I hadn't read it. The problem was that you were under the impression that prehistoric birds had flexible tails. My brash and uncalled-for explanation has enlightened you, no?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, I was wrong, I get that. It still doesn't excuse your behaviour, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And I don't see what behaviour there is to excuse.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I dunno man. I've seen some redtails with some pretty messed up tails from hunting xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1