HOME | DD

Simuha999 — 365 Days: Day 1: Artist's Mind

Published: 2010-07-17 22:34:03 +0000 UTC; Views: 697; Favourites: 30; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Starting out 365 Days inspired by a group on Flickr! Don't know if its going to last but hey! Seems like fun!

Wanted to do something crazy, arty and which involved my new hat!
Related content
Comments: 14

wilderBeest [2010-07-21 07:24:55 +0000 UTC]

LOL!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dannyfaria [2010-07-20 19:36:23 +0000 UTC]

i like it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Emoeba [2010-07-20 18:02:50 +0000 UTC]

I do that, except the brushes usually end up in my ponytail!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

UmbraLunae [2010-07-20 08:00:26 +0000 UTC]

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha GORGEOUS!!!!! you're a crack!! really like it, soooo original concept...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AidenVennis [2010-07-19 17:51:42 +0000 UTC]

Nice idea! To bad about the noise

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Early-Bird-Special [2010-07-19 16:45:50 +0000 UTC]

The hat reminds me of Van Gogh, as does the paintbrush in the mouth (not that I've ever seen a painting of Van Gogh with a paintbrush in his mouth; it's just that there's a long-time rumor that he ate paint.) Anyway. Sorry for my rambling... Nice work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lindseyshemwell In reply to Early-Bird-Special [2010-07-19 17:03:02 +0000 UTC]

It wasn't that he ate it, it's just that when artists back in the day painted they used turpentine, which they mostly banned after finding out it had highly addictive and eventually fatal qualities. It was very messy so you can imagine an artist that puts the brush in his mouth for a moment or paints while he eats and uses his fingers to correct the occasional excess paint can become easily addicted.

-Studied it in Studio in Art, he's my old art teachers favorite artist so we learned a lot about him.

~ Rave <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Early-Bird-Special In reply to lindseyshemwell [2010-07-19 17:19:49 +0000 UTC]

Finally, someone who knows more about traditional art than me on this site! (: I applaud you. You have no idea how lonely it was before now...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lindseyshemwell In reply to Early-Bird-Special [2010-07-19 17:24:15 +0000 UTC]

xD Thanks,I just had a really awesome and dedicated art teacher. ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Early-Bird-Special In reply to lindseyshemwell [2010-07-19 17:36:48 +0000 UTC]

That's good. (: I personally don't know a ton about art history, but there are a lot of people on this site who don't know what I mean when I reference Dali... *headdesk*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lindseyshemwell In reply to Early-Bird-Special [2010-07-19 17:53:07 +0000 UTC]

Wow, that's kind of sad, still not everybody knows the artists by their names, I'm sure if they could put the name to Persistence of Time they'd know. Just like Georgia O'Keeffe always left her signature off her artwork,saying that you'll know her work when you see it. Many people know Georgia O'Keeffe, but don't know her work. Which is sad and unfortunate, but she left her name off which diminished a lot of the value and made it harder to sell her work, so there aren't a lot of her work to be "proven".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Early-Bird-Special In reply to lindseyshemwell [2010-07-19 22:59:45 +0000 UTC]

Yes! But I like the statement it makes: An artist should be defined by style, not by name.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lindseyshemwell In reply to Early-Bird-Special [2010-07-22 01:11:24 +0000 UTC]

That was the idea! Of course it still makes it harder to prove copies, no one can perfectly forge a signature and usually that is the key indicator. Otherwise,you have to test the paints and canvas dates and even then it doesn't necessarily prove it was hers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Early-Bird-Special In reply to lindseyshemwell [2010-07-23 03:32:24 +0000 UTC]

Exactly... But I don't think it should matter, personally. Art should be valued by beauty and design, not by name. However, it is annoying for museums and such.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0