HOME | DD
SindreAHN β The Sea King
Published: 2006-08-16 16:40:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 1436; Favourites: 22; Downloads: 12
Redirect to original
Description
It was at time i got it in here
It took me 14 and a half hours !
This is one of the first versions we got here in 1974, only that this one is upgraded with a Infra red camera on it`s left side.
-----
Drawed for the 330 squadron here in BodΓΈ. I got help with details from a pilot i know
-----
It is also for the North Norway Main Rescue Sentral, where my Dad works as a rescue leader
-----
I used 2H HB 6B 2B 4B H And some special shadeing pencil, and my patient
Hope you will like it and enjoy it
PS: The words on the machine is RESCUEDUTY and AIRFORCE
THIS IS HARD WORK
Related content
Comments: 36
Thank u very much !!! new drawing of the sea king under way !
π: 0 β©: 0
Wow thats amazing, i'll bet it took you that long, and i though mine were good, my dad used to fly the S-61N on the north sea
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes yes yes the first of my great drawings with 100
6 of them me
π: 0 β©: 0
Excellent drawing, you are one of the most talented artists of that subject.
π: 0 β©: 1
wow, thats a very good drawing! Kjempebra detaljer, meget realistisk.
π: 0 β©: 1
Tusen takk
fint Γ₯ hΓΈre fra norske
π: 0 β©: 1
hehe
π: 0 β©: 1
Hmm har ikke hΓΈrt om sΓ₯ mange du og 4 andre
π: 0 β©: 1
A very good drawing of an excellent helicoptre. Detailed and very true to life! Keep on drawing!
π: 0 β©: 1
Takketakk
Thanx
π: 0 β©: 0
dude.. that is sweet... Wish i could draw like that
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes i love my aircrafts detailed
π: 0 β©: 0
Very nice drawing. Impressive detail and shading. I wish I had the patientce to work on one drawing for 14 and a half hours.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ooohh double comment
thanx for your comment
π: 0 β©: 0
Very nice drawing. Impressive detail and shading. I wish I had the patientce to work on one drawing for 14 and a half hours.
π: 0 β©: 1
You do so
I love my patient, or else i could not have bin drawing.........BUT I DO DRAW
π: 0 β©: 0
very nice! ive got a question there seems to be to names to the seaking, the SH-3 and the SH-16, which one is the correct designation?
π: 0 β©: 1
Westland Augusta Sikorsky SH-3 Sea King
π: 0 β©: 0
It may be hard work, but it is well worth it!
Oh, by the way, I've completed my aircraft drawing.
It's a praticital aircraft I call the "StarFire F-1A"
It won't be posted for quite a long time due to fact I don't have a scanner, but it looks pretty cool
If you want full details, just ask me
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanx for the fav and for liking one of my longest works
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok let us start with details, what does it looks like ``in the real world`` ?
Background of your machine ?
1 or a 2 seater ?
How many engines 1 or 2 ?
Delta or standard wings ?
Air intakes ?
Manufacture ? ``Plantaryfox``
π: 0 β©: 1
It's a fictional aircraft that I designed myself.
It has a fuesalage that resembles that of an F-86 "Sabre"
The engines of an F-14 "Tomcat". One of the engines is located in the same position as that of an F-86, the 2 other engines are located in the same positions as those of an F-14, next to the cockpit, under the wings. The engines under the wings are very short, they don't run the length of the aircraft like those of an F-14, but they work. ...So 3 engines total.
This aircraft has Delta wings. It is a jet.
3 Air intakes. (One for each engine, of course)
1 seater.
Manufacturer: AMAC (Australian Modern Aircraft Company)
Also fictional.
Backround:
The 25ft long "StarFire" F-1A could be put into service by the RAAF in the year 2018.
This aircraft is equipped with 6 Air to Air missiles and 2 Air to Ship/ground missiles.
However, this plane in no way relys in missiles alone.
It is also armed with 4 .50 cal. machine guns and 2 chainguns that are similar to the type the A-10 used in its campaign.
What makes this plane unique is where the chainguns are placed.
They are placed directly in front of the engines' air intakes. Now, on any other aircraft, placing chainguns in front of the engines is an extreamly stupid thing to do because the discharged empty shells would travel into the engines and damage them. Well, the discharged shells of this aircraft are made of a special combustable material that the engines can burn, giving the aircraft a slightly longer flight time when engaged in combat. Another good thing about these shells is they don't burn up when the bullets are fired from them, only when they end up in the engine.
This aircraft is rather stubby and heavy compared to most other fighters, but a combination of large flaps, movable tail wings, and powerfull engines give this aircraft superb manuverability.
This aircraft only has a meduim amount of armour, mostly because the 2 main things this plane has are fuel and ammo.
It wouldn't get off the ground if too much armour was placed on it.
Total flight time: 2 hours at crusing speed. 45 minutes at full afterburner.
Total speed: 900mph.
Due to the immense cost this aircraft would have, only 20 or so of them would be produced practically.
π: 0 β©: 2
"at full afterburner"
I'm afraid it wouldn't be able to have any afterburner with Tomcat engines the size of an F-86. Afterburner can double the length of an engine.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hmm, you may be right about that
Nice new avatar by the way.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you.
And to Sindre, are you sure you don't use reference photos for these!?
π: 0 β©: 1
yes sir, this one i didn`t use that much photos on, i`ve used a flight sim game XD
π: 0 β©: 0
Well that seems to be good.
How much USD will it cost ?
ammo and fuel capasity `?
π: 0 β©: 1
Ammo: 2,000 rounds of 50 cal. rounds per gun. 8,000 rounds total.
5,000 rounds per chaingun. 10,000 rounds total
Total ammo capacity: 18,000 rounds.
Fuel capacity: At the risk of making this aircraft not practical, I cannot give an estimate as to the amount of fuel this aircraft can hold.
π: 0 β©: 1
Roger that i am waiting is it perfect shadeing
π: 0 β©: 0