HOME | DD

sm-forrester — Dinner at the edge of the Abyss

#animals #fish #mosasaur #paleoart #prehistoric #platecarpus #gillicus #killme #notadinosaur
Published: 2017-12-08 18:25:06 +0000 UTC; Views: 1696; Favourites: 80; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description me,  at 7pm: hmm, I have nothing to do, let me just satisfy this idea of a drawing I've had for while with a nice *quick* sketch...

me now, at 2:20am the next day:  🙃 🙃 🙃

feat;
Platecarpus tympaniticus
an unlucky Gillicus arcuatus

Related content
Comments: 17

Philoceratops [2018-01-15 03:54:14 +0000 UTC]

One little nitpick of mine: fossil evidence points to Platecarpus specifically having banded flippers, as well as amber eyes. Yup, a color study was done on this guy!
































also I have the pleasure of seeing the actual fossil




which is complete, and also has skin impressions


and a preserved trachea

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

vasix In reply to Philoceratops [2018-08-10 08:16:21 +0000 UTC]

COLOR STUDY??? WHEEEN???? I mean the only mosasaur color study I know of was the one involving a leatherback turtle, Stenopterygius and Tylosaurus nepaeolicus...so...I am not familiar with the Platecarpus one

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TroodonVet [2017-12-09 12:52:50 +0000 UTC]

rip fishy...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

snoozer-boozers [2017-12-09 05:23:30 +0000 UTC]

very nice 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sm-forrester In reply to snoozer-boozers [2017-12-09 05:53:08 +0000 UTC]

thanks my d00d

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snoozer-boozers In reply to sm-forrester [2017-12-09 06:05:39 +0000 UTC]

No problem my g

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThalassoAtrox [2017-12-09 03:01:21 +0000 UTC]

Nice work, very cool and atmospheric.  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sm-forrester In reply to ThalassoAtrox [2017-12-09 03:04:17 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much! 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Evodolka [2017-12-08 19:25:42 +0000 UTC]

i actually wonder, do we know how deep mosasaurs could dive?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Yutyrannus In reply to Evodolka [2017-12-09 17:42:29 +0000 UTC]

There's actually an upcoming paper working on trying to figure out the diving depths of various mosasaur taxa

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Evodolka In reply to Yutyrannus [2017-12-09 19:03:09 +0000 UTC]

awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sm-forrester In reply to Evodolka [2017-12-08 19:43:58 +0000 UTC]

IIRC, normally mosasaurs were more surface predators, but they did have the ability to go just above/into the area of the sea where sunlight just can't penetrate (Aphotic zone: about 200m below sea level.). Hunting a few metres above the aphotic zone, with a rather limited amount of sunlight reaching the water, would be easier as the animal is concealed by shadows. That's the depth of the Platecarpus and Gillicus are in this picture. I don't know what depth would actually seriously harm them however, but they probably wouldn't even go near it seeing they liked the shallows much better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Evodolka In reply to sm-forrester [2017-12-08 20:20:05 +0000 UTC]

ok so they were shallow sea goers but they had the ability to dive a little bit

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sm-forrester In reply to Evodolka [2017-12-09 01:45:53 +0000 UTC]

Exactly, just like modern bottlenose dolphins

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Evodolka In reply to sm-forrester [2017-12-09 01:58:10 +0000 UTC]

i was going to say like whale sharks, i think those aren't deep sea

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sm-forrester In reply to Evodolka [2017-12-09 02:00:10 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, whale sharks feed up near the surface

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Evodolka In reply to sm-forrester [2017-12-09 02:09:17 +0000 UTC]

cool, i wasn't wrong

👍: 0 ⏩: 0