HOME | DD

SnowPoring — Path to the Sun

Published: 2010-07-21 20:06:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 2281; Favourites: 89; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Playing with IR photos again today. Taken in infra-red, colours as they came out of camera.
Related content
Comments: 45

ThePlanetRodinia [2011-06-29 05:59:14 +0000 UTC]

Wow! I really feel like I can look into it!
I hear the leaves, feel the breeze but it's like the afterlife.
Really intense!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ankelwar [2011-02-04 20:16:44 +0000 UTC]

WoW!! awesome!! I like it so much!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Phoenix-Ocean [2010-11-15 19:01:38 +0000 UTC]

Just wowww.... this is so good, it looks like another world. I thought at first that it was a 3D render or a photo manipulation. Great work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to Phoenix-Ocean [2010-11-15 23:27:15 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. Well, infra-red photos do often look "other world".

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheBlindProphetess [2010-07-28 20:54:00 +0000 UTC]

*claws at screen* I cans live there plz?????? *o* soooo much blue and white *happyflails* its so very very beautiful!! beats yucky green by miles

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to TheBlindProphetess [2010-07-28 21:02:30 +0000 UTC]

Hehe, I was there again earlier this evening. Sorting out photos now... swan family were sleeping under the big tree to the right.

Anyways, alas the colour isn't real, at least not as far as human sight normally works. That's a world I like to see through the camera. Very green there to these organic eyes. You can kinda fake it a bit with the right filters, but you see a world in white, red and black. That reminds me, got the Kanon Wakeshima CD today

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindProphetess In reply to SnowPoring [2010-07-28 21:05:32 +0000 UTC]

i see the world in RAINBOW!!!
is it good? meh as long as I have my youtube im good XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to TheBlindProphetess [2010-07-28 21:26:24 +0000 UTC]

Just wrote a little in journal, but I think it's even better than youtube As suspected, the one I got is not a Japan original. Looks decently made but I dunno if it's a HK bootleg or an official non-Japan production.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindProphetess In reply to SnowPoring [2010-07-29 06:53:26 +0000 UTC]

awwwwwwwwwww how annoying

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to TheBlindProphetess [2010-07-29 16:23:35 +0000 UTC]

There is the old saying: if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Then again I did get a genuine Japanese CD for a decent price off HK ebay sellers before, but it was an old one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DeviantCalieL [2010-07-24 18:22:26 +0000 UTC]

great shot

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

child-of-aros [2010-07-22 21:31:37 +0000 UTC]

oh thats lovely

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

edinek [2010-07-22 20:26:14 +0000 UTC]

Fabulous...I liked it so much !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to edinek [2010-07-22 20:33:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DJKlos [2010-07-22 19:39:42 +0000 UTC]

I dig the lens flare. Is that real or rendered?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to DJKlos [2010-07-22 19:45:39 +0000 UTC]

Real. Samyang 8mm fisheye... flare looks much brighter in IR than visible light. Very hard to keep the sun off it...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DJKlos In reply to SnowPoring [2010-07-22 20:16:50 +0000 UTC]

No fisheye distortion . . . Do tell. You photoshop it out?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to DJKlos [2010-07-22 20:33:50 +0000 UTC]

No distortion correction either. I did to a slight crop but nothing to do with distortion or perspective. It doesn't visibly show distortion too much as long as the straight lines are close to radial from the middle.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wolf-in-a-dress [2010-07-22 13:43:50 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful!!!!!!
Like a world frozen in time

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to wolf-in-a-dress [2010-07-22 16:51:20 +0000 UTC]

So that's what frozen time looks like

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wolf-in-a-dress In reply to SnowPoring [2010-07-22 17:35:36 +0000 UTC]

You don't want to know how I know that...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to wolf-in-a-dress [2010-07-22 18:50:23 +0000 UTC]

But... saying I don't want to know just makes me want to know more

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wolf-in-a-dress In reply to SnowPoring [2010-07-22 19:51:30 +0000 UTC]

Well, Time is a rather paranoid being
Be sure not to use the expression 'killing Time' or she will avoid you like the plague.
Thus, despite my young looks I am actually 53. Or thereabouts anyway...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to wolf-in-a-dress [2010-07-22 20:48:58 +0000 UTC]

Too complicated for me

If anything I'm the opposite... my physical age exceeds my mental age...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

TheBlindProphetess In reply to SnowPoring [2010-07-28 20:52:42 +0000 UTC]

and SHES the YOUNGER sister O.o

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to TheBlindProphetess [2010-07-28 20:58:30 +0000 UTC]

What does that make you then? One hundred and eleventy one?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindProphetess In reply to SnowPoring [2010-07-28 21:04:07 +0000 UTC]

how dare you sir im not a day over one hundered and two ...

how does infrared work if you shoot people??? do they go pretty and white too?? *o* (has a slight thing for white hair/skin )

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SnowPoring In reply to TheBlindProphetess [2010-07-28 21:24:34 +0000 UTC]

damn, smilie fail *must remember to preview before sending*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SnowPoring In reply to TheBlindProphetess [2010-07-28 21:24:05 +0000 UTC]

Too old D *runs faster than a very fast thing going fastly*

Erm... I haven't tried people myself, but it is supposed to make skin go bright. In random dA samples I just checked out, hair could go light or dark, but I don't know what the factor is in that. [link] Do remember that the mapping of IR back to visible can and does vary with the camera, the filter and processing so it can still look different. Mine is a somewhat conventional process where bright IR stuff is white-ish, with a slight red or blue cast depending on something I dunno yet, and some man made blue and black items (e.g. plastic, dyes) looking very blue.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindProphetess In reply to SnowPoring [2010-07-29 06:55:10 +0000 UTC]

coooool :3

*throws shoe at*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to TheBlindProphetess [2010-07-29 16:22:26 +0000 UTC]

*catches shoe and sells it on ebay*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindProphetess In reply to SnowPoring [2010-07-29 17:00:29 +0000 UTC]

damn ¬_¬

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wolf-in-a-dress In reply to SnowPoring [2010-07-23 07:23:53 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SashaM7 [2010-07-21 22:47:14 +0000 UTC]

A superb shot I love it. I really should get an IR filter and convert my old camera lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to SashaM7 [2010-07-22 16:47:07 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I went converted camera to make things easier. I like seeing this alternate view of the world.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SashaM7 In reply to SnowPoring [2010-07-22 19:18:51 +0000 UTC]

np and I agree, it's best to convert one camera just for IR, which i'm going to do as soon as i get a second camera. It is definitely an interesting side of the world, so many possibilities.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to SashaM7 [2010-07-22 19:46:46 +0000 UTC]

That's why I got the 300D... cheapest DSLR I could get, and instructions on how to disassemble it are out there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PrincessAbiliss [2010-07-21 22:15:08 +0000 UTC]

what a stunning shot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to PrincessAbiliss [2010-07-21 22:24:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Alannah-Hawker [2010-07-21 20:41:12 +0000 UTC]

Love this effect you do on some photos, the sun looks really good here, nice shot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2010-07-21 22:13:30 +0000 UTC]

It's infra-red photography... uses the light just beyond visible red, but not the far IR that thermal imagers detect. It tends to make plants glow bright, although as I'm shooting into the sun here it isn't so strong an effect.

If you want to have a go too, you can get a filter off ebay for under £15 or so (depending on size) for a no name one. I went and converted a camera for it to make things easier. But many considerations on how to use one...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to SnowPoring [2010-07-23 00:01:57 +0000 UTC]

Does sound interesting to do, nice results too, but I don't think it would work so well on the kind of shots I do, I think it works best for landscape kind of shots, which I'm not too good at Thanks for the info though

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2010-07-23 07:36:41 +0000 UTC]

I did try it on wildlife before, but they all come out dark But it can still be interesting if you catch their surroundings in that IR style.

Actually, I thought of an even cheaper way if you want to try it. I got some lighting gels (coloured plastic sheets) a while back to make my own "IR goggles" as your eyes are sensitive enough to see in IR with good sunlight. The film is cheap and comes in massive sheets, and I still have... almost all of it left over! So if you want to try I can send some segments over which you just need to cut to size and probably hold it in place using a UV filter is easiest.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to SnowPoring [2010-07-27 14:06:45 +0000 UTC]

Hmm, good idea. Do they work the same as the filter then or will the effect be less strong or something?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2010-07-27 16:33:53 +0000 UTC]

They work in much the same way as the dedicated filters. Basic theory is to cut out enough visible light to allow mostly the IR light through. Might need to experiment a bit depending on the false colour mix you are going for. If we meet at kitties then I'll bring some with me then.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0