Comments: 10
LadyTroodon [2017-05-22 23:38:55 +0000 UTC]
I like this rant but the centered text doesn't flow visually and makes it harder to read.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AGiLE-EaGLE1994 [2016-10-14 23:29:00 +0000 UTC]
I get that you don't want kids to see fetish art, that makes sense and is logical, but here's the thing-- If a kid really wants to see the pic, they can either A. Make an account and lie about their age, or B. stay as a guest and put a fake age into the prompt to show the pic and they'll still get to see it. dA can't tell who is and who isn't lying about their age unless someone else points it out. Putting mature content filters on fetish art does NOT prevent kids who don't have accounts from seeing it.
You know why?
Because if you're a guest, you can click the button to show the pic, and it asks you for your age and has one more button.
All the kid would have to do is put in a fake age there, click OK, and then they could see it.
The BEST way to restrict fetish art from minors is to put it on a side account and make it members only, AS WELL AS mature content, so that anyone who wants to see it will ABSOLUTELY HAVE TO MAKE AN ACCOUNT. Because if someone lies about their age when making an account, they can get banned/suspended for being underage.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SolarSandsxMe In reply to AGiLE-EaGLE1994 [2016-10-22 11:04:46 +0000 UTC]
Granted, they could put a fake age in. But even so if there was one, kids who don't want to see it won't see it instead of them just seeing it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SolarSandsxMe [2016-08-18 17:47:19 +0000 UTC]
i did not re-read any of this
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HetaFetish [2016-08-18 17:37:57 +0000 UTC]
Could not agree more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DarkFishking [2016-08-18 17:22:29 +0000 UTC]
Perfectly said.
Some people are in the stage of their mental development where they still have to find out their basic sexuality, sexual preferences and kinks.
Emphasis is on "basic".
Certain fetishes like furry and vore are complex, abstract and all these adjectives.
They are under the risk of disturbing the development.
Some people mature faster, earlier and younger than others but a generalisation has to be at some point.
I actually think that not every sexual artwork needs a mature content tag, i think it depends on the intensity and what fetishes are included.
Browsing DeviantArt gave me the thought that the current mature content filter is bad in generall.
That thing needs to be reworked.
For sexual art i would suggest a "staged" filter.
Here is what could be filtered: prude (100%), sexy (80%), seducing (60%), softcore (40%), mediocore (20%), hardcore (0%).
Just my idea, an idea i really like.
For things that require our current mature content tag for violence, gore etc. i could see something similar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nekroz-of-Mokey [2016-08-18 17:21:44 +0000 UTC]
Tbh these points are pretty elementary, but this debate is elementary, and fairly straightforward.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SolarSandsxMe In reply to Nekroz-of-Mokey [2016-08-18 17:35:11 +0000 UTC]
Yeah I didn't want too sound too professional but still have an element of seriousness =S
👍: 0 ⏩: 0