Comments: 33
winternachtloser [2013-09-12 14:51:35 +0000 UTC]
You are living in a fairy tale , magic country .
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Templdust [2011-12-27 03:48:46 +0000 UTC]
Very effective IR image. This image has been pirated by Nasrin Mohebbian on Google Plus. Do you want to defend your copyright? I can't report it, but you can. It is at: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sorny In reply to Topicality [2011-01-20 18:19:22 +0000 UTC]
Thank you (:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
marcschmidtmayer [2010-09-16 20:51:54 +0000 UTC]
Don't like the border but the picture is most beautiful !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
blackdaddy [2010-08-27 10:17:33 +0000 UTC]
sehr interessant...!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Setulge [2010-08-16 17:28:00 +0000 UTC]
wow... this is perfect... i love it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DimensionSeven [2010-08-16 15:55:16 +0000 UTC]
Gotta tell me more about the Samyang! How sharp is it in IR? For visible light, you can't beat the Nikon 10.5, but it's rather weak in IR.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sorny In reply to DimensionSeven [2010-08-16 17:24:08 +0000 UTC]
I'll do some investigation on that point! I'll test it on different apertures and focal length settings since the samyang needs some ajusting there (its really easy to do).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wakko-pj In reply to sorny [2010-08-25 01:00:31 +0000 UTC]
sorry for the question but, Samyang 8mm is not a fisheye with aspherical lens? how do you do with filters?
maybe i'm wrong with something.. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sorny In reply to wakko-pj [2010-08-25 05:47:02 +0000 UTC]
Hehe, thanks that you ask. The problem with fisheyes is, that there are no screw-in filters.
So, infrared photographers have to go another way to use such exotic lenses: Replace the Filter, which is in front of the sensor, so called infrared conversion.
That makes the camera only visible to infrared, no mather which lens etc. you use...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wakko-pj In reply to sorny [2010-09-05 16:32:07 +0000 UTC]
oh i've heard about this technique, but i'm not so familiar with.
thank you for the answer =]
and btw i really love your pic ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vw1956 [2010-08-16 09:44:38 +0000 UTC]
Schönes Licht!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1