HOME | DD
SpecialGuestStar — Soy
Published: 2019-11-23 03:21:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 399; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Related content
Comments: 29
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Of course there’s one turd in the punch bowl that takes offense and then tries to make that my problem.
So here, this is a boilerplate response to “that’s not funny.” :
The fellow on the right looks weird. Not only that but he look *aggressively* weird. He knows he looks weird but he expects people to treat him as if his presentation is normal.
And it isn’t normal.
And when people react to him in a normal way - that he is an offensive clown - he blames everyone but himself.
To dress like this, knowing how weird and clownish you look and then to demand people pretend not to notice, well that’s an embarrassing mental illness. It’s sufferers force their unpleasantness on others.
So yeah that guy is a joke and people will laugh at him and ostracize him. But that’s not all.
That’s what this guy wants because that gives him license to act like a baby and throw a tantrum. If he didn’t want it he wouldn’t go out of his way to 1) look weird and 2) demand respect anyway.
If he doesn’t want to be treated like a weirdo, he shouldn’t intentionally dress like a weirdo.
Cut your hair. Wear pants that make you look like a male person. Stand up straight. At least make an effort.
Otherwise accept you’re going to be treated like a crazy person.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Redefining maleness down
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What do you mean by that?
As far as I'm concerned, the things displayed in these pictures is entirely about fashion. A few decades ago, the most common fashion (for the middle class, at least) was a suit and tie. Now, it's less common. I'm not sure what makes that right or wrong. Things like the clothes we wear or the hairstyles we use are completely arbitrary, and have nothing to do with any inherent quality of masculinity. What we consider "male" in some cultures might not be associated with masculinity in other cultures. There's no objective standard for what's masculine in terms of how we present it through clothes and hairstyles. Having a man-bun or long wavy hair doesn't stop you from being, say, a lumberjack, a powerlifter, a marathon runner or a blue collar worker.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Way to murder the joke!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If this is a joke, what's the punchline? Nothing about this seems like it's meant to be funny.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I’m sorry this is happening to you
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I get it. You make a generic point about gender, can't actually defend it when questioned on it, retreat into "it was just a joke lol" then when questioned on that, you deflect again. About what I expected.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Well there was the invention of Milk Alternatives like Soy and Almond, that's one clue to figure out what went wrong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Is the soy boy in the pic Mr Atheist? looks like him.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Who’s that? Sounds like he might be entertaining for us conservatives to make fun of.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Naw, that's just his ex-boyfriend Scotty. He uh, didn't take the breakup very well
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mr. Atheist. Nice guy and sometime look to make fun of atheist too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Something indeed went wrong. It was allowing people to eat tons of soy
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Some people think that "soy face" in the Scotsman's 20-second-long insult from Samurai Jack is a racial slur against Asians.
This must be what he actually meant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I can imagine all the things that the Scotsman has to say to the soy boys.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Look up any glossary of Scottish insults—I'm sure he'll use every one.
(Actually, I've never seen a full episode of Samurai Jack, but I know the 20-second-long insult by pop culture osmosis and even indirectly reference it in my short story "Library of the Sea Goddess.")
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'll bet he will.
There was even a part in the last episode ever where the Scotsman takes 20 seconds to name all of his daughters (either 50 or 100), like he did with that 20-second-long insult.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Scotsman. R.I.P. Big friend of Jack.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I heard he still lives on as a ghost.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1