HOME | DD
SpiderGuile — Zatanna - Lille 2007
Published: 2007-12-18 11:16:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 901; Favourites: 18; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
I had fun doin' her!!!Related content
Comments: 18
*bows down at feet*
Thank you, thank you, thank you for not making her breasts absurdly huge. THANK YOU. There's actually a poster of Zatanna at my local comic book store in which she looks like she has somebody's ass stapled to her chest... God... who finds that attractive?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A lot of people loves big breast! I love it too! lol
But I don't think Zatanna should be represented as a porn babe-like hottie!!!
Merci à toi, I'm glad you appreciate my lil interpretation!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well I always say that if the superheroines have to have big breasts then the superheroes should have gigantic packages. Fair's fair!
Of course, if you imagine Superman with a two-foot salami in his pants you realize just how ridiculous it is to accentuate body parts to such a degree. Why should enormous breasts be any different? Besides, any woman with the athletic training of a superhero would have exceptionally small breasts, not the other way around. It is physically impossible to for pretty much any of them to have naturally gigantic breasts, so basically you have to decide whether you fake boobs sexy...
You can tell I spend a lot of time thinking about this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Quite a lot of time thinking about it, yeah! lol
I agree with you even more! I still like big boobs though!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh, I like them too. 
Of course, that's when it comes to real-life women. When it comes to cartoon women, on the other hand, I've never understood why it's so important for them to have stripper-sized boobs in the first place. I mean, they're 2-dimensional drawings! Isn't there enough porn saturating the market that people don't need to read comic books to get their rocks off? Couldn't we have ONE medium in which women are not seen as exaggerated sexual objects? They're only ink and paper, guys––you don't need to fantasize about them!
[/rant]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't agree with you, you can't say porn when talking about that! It's just one way of portraying breasts! Everybody doesn't do it the same as the other!!!! And I don't see that as sexual objects, just drawings!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes it's one way of portraying breasts, but why do you think they continue to do it that particular way? If these women are not supposed to be objects of desire, then why draw them that way at all?
Don't get me wrong, I love comic books and I think the superheroines usually have very interesting personalities and powers -- I just think that drawing them like strippers can only serve to take away from these other qualities. Men who are not as cool as you might give no thought to the character underneath the D-cup; and feminists might immediately dismiss the character as sexist without bothering to actually read the non-sexist writing, simply because of the way she is drawn. I can't see what good it does to draw such exaggerated anatomy, that's all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
There's no good or bad in this if it's not done with "after thoughts"!!! But I agree with you on most of what you said!!! We can draw'em differently and better!! That's a challenge to change things tha have been rampant in the comicbook biz since a long time!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
She looks amazing and I took the high road by not quipping about the doin' her comment...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I meant "drawin'her"!! Sorry
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
It's okay. You made me chuckle is all!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LOL!
This is a great illustration. I love how you render blacks, shadows and highlights. Those fishnets rock as well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1