HOME | DD

squonkhunter β€” Dump 23 May 2013

Published: 2013-05-24 02:32:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 1645; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description It's been months. I have way too many sketches; I didn't even scan them all...there are just too many. Anyway, more to come. Sorry it's been so long. These things take time.
Here's some Gulliver and HMS characters.
Related content
Comments: 46

Amenarae [2013-11-05 04:30:05 +0000 UTC]

Job seems adorable~!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to Amenarae [2013-11-05 04:44:12 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! He's a sweetheart.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

VFreie [2013-05-30 21:34:55 +0000 UTC]

I love your rendition of Gulliver, seriously. And the Gulliver I've always pictured in my mind was based off the one in the illustrated edition for children I read millennia ago, and that Lemuel was, from what I can remember, a hottie through and through. But yours is better.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to VFreie [2013-05-31 07:49:41 +0000 UTC]

LOL...Gulliver...a hottie. XD
Thank you. :3 I don't know. If I picture the characters as handsome, it makes everything they do a lot more entertaining.
"He ran."
Oooohh I bet he diiiid.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VFreie In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-31 12:09:47 +0000 UTC]

I FOUND IT. [link] Only, I owned a shortened edition with scratch-n-sniff pages or something scented like that; same illustrations though, and both editions published by Mursia. Ahh, the memories...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to VFreie [2013-05-31 12:13:02 +0000 UTC]

LOLOLOLOL shirtless I'm sure wasn't necessary...I distinctly remember he was wearing a shirt during that scene because he noted it, as he notes everything. XD
Ach it made me happy to see the title in Italian.
Scratch and sniff? That couldn't have been pleasant in Brobdingnag or amongst the Yahoos. XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VFreie In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-31 12:32:11 +0000 UTC]

Illustrators had a field day with letting their imagination run wild, right? (Also, trousers with typically 20th century belt in the 1700s? Looooool nice try.) Only nowadays, looking after many years at my mythology for kids books that the pretty nymphs and Greek goddesses sported a somewhat suspicious likeness to 1970s pin-ups... I see what you did there, Libico Maraja. But then again, there were also such epic moments of epicness moments as this: [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to VFreie [2013-05-31 21:59:22 +0000 UTC]

Oh HAYL yeah here comes Zeus! That's awesome. I need to go back and look at my old children's books. I have one that's a "Stories of the Opera" collection where basically it tells the stories of different operas and illustrates them.
Here's the cover: [link]
Here's La Cenerentola, with the title character and the prince in disguise of the valet: [link]
Here's a bigger picture of that: [link]
The Flying Dutchman: [link]
Orpheus and Eurydice: [link]
The Magic Flute: [link]
Tamino being a dip (Tamino is always a dip): [link]

God, this is a pretty book. Guess who has some new summer reading to do!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VFreie In reply to squonkhunter [2013-06-03 20:22:45 +0000 UTC]

Ohh pretty!
...Prettier than *my* summer readings, anyway. My bad for mostly reading books where the peak of illustration you can get is a terrain map.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to VFreie [2013-06-04 21:58:35 +0000 UTC]

XD A lot of history, then? History can be extremely fun, as I'm sure you already know. I'm reading some historical fiction myself, where the peak of the art is a map. XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VFreie In reply to squonkhunter [2013-06-05 16:54:42 +0000 UTC]

A lot of history, both fiction (oh hi there War and peace) and non-fiction (oh hi there Die Bauern in der europΓ€ischen Geschichte). I tend to prefer non-fiction as of late, but then again, Tolstoy is pretty great at describing young hussars being emotional at military parades.
What is that you're reading?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to VFreie [2013-06-05 20:52:31 +0000 UTC]

Sounds awesome! Can you read German? Wie viele Sprachen sprechen Sie?
I'm reading the Ibis trilogy by Amitav Ghosh. Right now only two of the volumes have been published: Sea of Poppies and River of Smoke. The first, Sea of Poppies, takes place in India just before the outbreak of the first Opium War. We meet our characters, an incredibly diverse cast from all around the world, all with different dialects and jargon, all authentically represented. Ghosh also presents the characters objectively, so you, the reader, decide whether or not you like them based on their actions. He brings them alive with devotion to everyone's back stories and their lingo; it's incredible to house that many opposing opinions in one head.
The second, River of Smoke, takes place mostly in Canton, and I'm in the middle of it now.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VFreie In reply to squonkhunter [2013-06-16 21:16:36 +0000 UTC]

Nichts so viele. Nur Italienisch, Englisch, Deutsch, und ein bisschen Russisch. And I'm more or less capable of reading French, at the condition I don't have to write it or - God forbid - speak it. (I should mention, though, I am reading that book in the Italian translation; I was too scatterbrained to look up if there exists an English one, guh.)

That sounds interesting. I'm positive I've seen the translated edition neatly piled at the bookstore, but I'd rather be a total language hipster and hunt down a copy of the original; especially if there's dialect and jargon at work, I don't want to miss that out.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to VFreie [2013-06-16 23:15:51 +0000 UTC]

Ach, Russisch? Ich wollte Russisch lernen, aber ich habe nicht ganz Italienisch oder Deutsch meistern. Sì, il francese è molto simile all'italiano, purché lo si legge. XP

Ach yes, the original English versions of Sea of Poppies and River of Smoke are essential. There are too many dialects and too much jargon to translate smoothly, and your English is impeccable, so you'll have no trouble with it. At least, not any more trouble than an English speaker would. The lascar tongue is supposed to be hard to understand, and the Eastern jargon one of the British officers speaks is supposed to be difficult; he's one of those characters who says a lot but the people comprehending him can only pick out one or two words. Don't worry; a lot of the characters are just as confused as the reader, especially since this is 19th century jargon, as well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VFreie In reply to squonkhunter [2013-07-13 17:19:24 +0000 UTC]

Late replies are laaaate. Shame on me. 8(

Sja, Russisch. Der Uni-Kurs war leider ziemlich schlecht, aber ich hoffe noch, dass ich spΓ€ter mal die Sprache wieder ins Leben rufen kann.

Deal! If I ever pick up that book, I'll make sure it's the English version, and will have fun testing the limits of my English reading ability against lascar and 19th century-ese. x)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to VFreie [2013-07-17 01:11:31 +0000 UTC]

Yes, that would be great. Sorry you can't find anything good enough in University.

Yes! You'll have fun with it. Historical fiction for the win!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CptKay [2013-05-24 20:45:29 +0000 UTC]

I need to upload a sketch dump haha XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to CptKay [2013-05-25 02:46:53 +0000 UTC]

Do it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CptKay In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-25 06:45:40 +0000 UTC]

Alright, I will ^^ just gotta darken the sketches enough so my stupid scanner actually picks them up XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to CptKay [2013-05-27 21:43:01 +0000 UTC]

You may also be able to lessen the brightness on the scanner itself.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CptKay In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-27 22:08:42 +0000 UTC]

I don't think I've ever tried that o.o not sure if idiot or I just can't XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to CptKay [2013-05-28 07:19:07 +0000 UTC]

Lol give it a shot! See if you can open your scanner's settings.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KillingersBlood [2013-05-24 04:32:01 +0000 UTC]

'Teller: *jab jab*...*jabjabjabjabjab*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to KillingersBlood [2013-05-25 02:46:48 +0000 UTC]

XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Shadowhunter625 [2013-05-24 02:36:27 +0000 UTC]

Cool!

Oooo, I like Job. he's pretty interesting!

Of course Young Sridar; charming as ever~

I see some Clive, A Remfield, and The guy with the donkey skin...hmmmm....what's his name?

Also...who's the one with his hair tied back at the top?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to Shadowhunter625 [2013-05-24 03:15:51 +0000 UTC]

The guy with the donkey skin haha that threw me for a loop. It's Basil! Basilio is the character I based him off of and he has the donkey skin. Basil does not, though he has the same character design. I'm flattered that you remembered, though.
The guy with his hair tied back at the top is Lemuel Gulliver from Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels". An excellent read.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shadowhunter625 In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-24 04:28:37 +0000 UTC]

I just remembered him like that because you said he wore a donkey skin XD

He's kinda cute. also Job, he's cute too

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to Shadowhunter625 [2013-05-27 21:50:05 +0000 UTC]

XD Lol yeah, I understand. Gotcha.

Lol thanks. Job is meant to be cute, so I'm glad that came out.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shadowhunter625 In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-27 23:39:01 +0000 UTC]

Hehe

I mean,...just the glasses complete it. Loveable, smart looking guy

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to Shadowhunter625 [2013-05-28 07:17:36 +0000 UTC]

I can only hint that you not get too attached to him.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shadowhunter625 In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-28 13:54:58 +0000 UTC]

...is he going to die in the comic or something?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to Shadowhunter625 [2013-05-28 17:23:27 +0000 UTC]

I won't hint at anything more.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shadowhunter625 In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-28 20:35:39 +0000 UTC]

Ok, I will just have to find out

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to Shadowhunter625 [2013-05-29 01:29:02 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shadowhunter625 In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-29 03:11:03 +0000 UTC]

-jumps on you- draw....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to Shadowhunter625 [2013-05-29 10:44:06 +0000 UTC]

GAK! Get off me, kid!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shadowhunter625 In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-29 13:57:34 +0000 UTC]

Not until you draw me what I want!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to Shadowhunter625 [2013-05-29 21:15:13 +0000 UTC]

Okay okay FINE!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shadowhunter625 In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-29 21:17:06 +0000 UTC]

-jumps off- go my minion!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to Shadowhunter625 [2013-05-29 21:45:17 +0000 UTC]

*scurries off*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shadowhunter625 In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-29 21:46:36 +0000 UTC]

Good girl.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Avield [2013-05-24 02:32:46 +0000 UTC]

Seriously... you draw stuff like HMS and then I see this and I'm like... WTF why don't you do a webcomic with these guys?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to Avield [2013-05-24 03:13:41 +0000 UTC]

...I...DO have a web comic with these guys. That's what HMS is, sir. *confused face*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Avield In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-24 03:41:34 +0000 UTC]

I mean something a little more serious. Something like downtown abbey or Sherlock Holmes. Your HMS is very fantasy based, but not the same English/European feel.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

squonkhunter In reply to Avield [2013-05-27 21:55:44 +0000 UTC]

Right now the comic is entering its English feel, as we are following the knights. When we go back to their world, it's very Victorian. In fact, the conversion over into traditionally painted comics was partly to accommodate the Victorian feel. The comic gets very serious later on, almost to a point where keeping it funny will be a hassle. Pretty much all of these sketches are characters that will be appearing in the comic, so there is nothing to worry about as far as a European feel goes. With Rem and Jez, we get a different feel, as they're from a different world. With our villain, we get yet another feel.
But anyway, I AM doing a comic with these guys. ALL of these guys except for Gulliver, the Chinese lady from In The Mood For Love, and the live sketches of musical performers. That's why I was confused when you said I should do a comic with them because...I already am.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Avield In reply to squonkhunter [2013-05-27 22:12:58 +0000 UTC]

Neat.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0