Comments: 12
SRegan In reply to Tapion-sheeep [2005-02-19 10:51:45 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for your comment. I really didn't think it had come out all that well when I first put it up, but it's grown on me. I'm thinking of doing a shaded version, but I'm a bit short of time at the minute.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yetizor [2005-02-18 10:50:30 +0000 UTC]
Thats pretty darn good for using a program like ms paint or photoshop.
Did you use a tablet or was it the mouse you used?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SRegan In reply to Yetizor [2005-02-18 11:21:38 +0000 UTC]
Just the mouse - I'm not very good with the tablet yet. I traced on the second layer over my original drawing. If you look close enough, you'll note there aren't actually any curved lines except for the circles: that's because PaintNET doesn't support them, unlike MS Paint. In retrospect, I could have made the edges smoother by using part of a circle, but that'll have to wait until I do another sketch I can be bothered to digitise... Anyway, thanks for your comment!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheMonkeyKingOfOld In reply to SRegan [2005-02-16 19:41:58 +0000 UTC]
yeah it sucks when you realise you've just slaped paint over the line work. dont give up on digital art just yet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
reverseg [2005-02-16 16:45:52 +0000 UTC]
MMm.. a little on the messy side, but why am I complaining? It's great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SRegan In reply to reverseg [2005-02-16 16:49:24 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for your comment. Would you mind clarifying, though, for the future - is it 'messy' just in terms of the linework, or because it's been compressed? It does look better in full-view, because I didn't provide a preview, and it was in fairly high resolution...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
reverseg In reply to SRegan [2005-02-16 16:53:49 +0000 UTC]
I was referring to the abundance of lines within the actual clothes, which really detriment the overall look. (It does look 'messy' from afar) I'm not talking about the folds on the clothing, those are fine, it's just those miscellaneous little lines within the actual clothing.
That's just my take on it. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SRegan In reply to reverseg [2005-02-16 16:56:12 +0000 UTC]
That's OK. Thanks for taking the time to reply back.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0