HOME | DD

stuck-in-suburbia In reply to silverhammer [2010-10-06 17:49:13 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stuck-in-suburbia In reply to Jerekh [2010-10-06 04:55:12 +0000 UTC]

Uh, no. Not everything is about you, so we would like you to think, so that we can talk about you without you knowing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jerekh In reply to stuck-in-suburbia [2010-10-06 05:25:27 +0000 UTC]

but wouldn't the best way to talk about me be by doing so right while I'm there, but with subtext? that way it would be like you watching me watch you watch me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stuck-in-suburbia In reply to Jerekh [2010-10-06 05:31:19 +0000 UTC]

Or talking about you while talking to you while you don't know we are talking about you. Which we have never done before. Ever.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jerekh In reply to stuck-in-suburbia [2010-10-06 18:02:18 +0000 UTC]

especially not Monday night

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stuck-in-suburbia In reply to Jerekh [2010-10-06 18:04:43 +0000 UTC]

Well, monday we were talking about you so that you knew we were talking about you. Completely different.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jerekh In reply to stuck-in-suburbia [2010-10-06 18:06:30 +0000 UTC]

naw ... you were also talking about me other than talking to me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stuck-in-suburbia In reply to Jerekh [2010-10-06 18:10:48 +0000 UTC]

But you knew. See, there have been times when we talk about you, and you dunno we are.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jerekh In reply to stuck-in-suburbia [2010-10-07 04:38:12 +0000 UTC]

Or, and I know this is radical, you didn't know that I knew . Tru Fax

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stuck-in-suburbia In reply to Jerekh [2010-10-07 04:56:47 +0000 UTC]

No, you definitely did not know. For srs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0