HOME | DD

Stumm47 — 4468 Mallard by-nc-nd

Published: 2008-12-22 22:02:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 1828; Favourites: 82; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description The fastest steam locomotive in the world!
Featured by here [link]
Related content
Comments: 52

Stumm47 In reply to ??? [2020-04-15 09:10:29 +0000 UTC]

I didn't know that

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlanPegler In reply to Stumm47 [2020-04-15 11:32:08 +0000 UTC]

Ok.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tombola1993 [2017-06-25 16:06:22 +0000 UTC]

Love the colours.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to tombola1993 [2017-06-28 06:48:42 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jakeukalane [2017-04-19 17:20:46 +0000 UTC]

so shiny

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Jakeukalane [2017-06-28 06:48:52 +0000 UTC]

Indeed

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Steamking4468 [2015-07-24 05:34:27 +0000 UTC]

My favourite locomotive. Hopefully they will dust the cobwebs off her before she hits 100 years old and get someone to run her. Hate seeing her sitting there without running.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Steamking4468 [2015-08-02 19:36:49 +0000 UTC]

I'm afraid Mallard will never steam again

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steamking4468 In reply to Stumm47 [2015-08-02 22:30:55 +0000 UTC]

Can never say never, especially with the NRM. The major work on her will be the boiler. Mechanically she should still be in great shape otherwise she would not have visited several places by being towed on the east coast main line.
Same could be said for Duchess of Hamilton as well as a few others.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Steamking4468 [2015-08-07 19:54:18 +0000 UTC]

I'm afraid to get Mallard steaming would take a total rebuild, it's rotten inside. The Flying Scotsman has been in rebuild for years and it's all down to money. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steamking4468 In reply to Stumm47 [2015-08-07 20:28:02 +0000 UTC]

No chance it is rotten. She has been under cover in the museum. If she was rotten they wouldn't have towed her on Network Rail. So she cannot be that bad at all!
The boiler needs a lot of work. I know that for fact which was the reason she did limited runs during 1986 to 1988. But there is a spare boiler if they organised things properly.
And as for money she wouldn't be as big a money pit as Scotsman has been but then everyone had a piece of that and got something out of it. No wonder it has cost so much. But I will defend Scotsman due to the amount of work she has done in preservation.
As for overhauls they are a bit like rebuilds. You strip em down and start wheels up. I have just started one as I own my own loco.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Steamking4468 [2015-08-08 22:01:16 +0000 UTC]

The money just isn't there now, and Scotsman has gone way over budget. 4 million it's cost!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steamking4468 In reply to Stumm47 [2015-08-08 22:50:12 +0000 UTC]

I know the money isn't there. And as for future overhauls no one should ever rely on York to ever fund another project again. The Friends of NRM no doubt would help and do a lot to support and fund raise but NRM would probably never put money forward. Not for some time.
Everyone who is a contractor and worked on Scotsman would have added so much to their bill. No bloody wonder it is over the £4m mark!
Same will be argued for Hamilton as well. No money in the pot and Green Arrow and Q1 and whatever else you would like to see run.
I would love to see all of them run but it just isn't going to happen unless my Euro ticket comes up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Midway2009 [2013-04-02 05:19:08 +0000 UTC]

I have seen this engine when I was in York.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Midway2009 [2013-04-05 21:13:44 +0000 UTC]

Yea thats where i saw it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Midway2009 In reply to Stumm47 [2013-04-06 06:30:25 +0000 UTC]

Cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

broettonavarro [2012-03-11 21:03:52 +0000 UTC]

I didn't knew this machine... looks awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to broettonavarro [2012-03-11 21:10:09 +0000 UTC]

It was the worlds fastest locomotive, a long time ago, world famous

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

broettonavarro In reply to Stumm47 [2012-03-11 21:12:25 +0000 UTC]

Wikipedia is telling me exactly that

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to broettonavarro [2012-03-11 21:20:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Supercooper17 [2012-03-11 14:00:59 +0000 UTC]

Fastest steam train eveeer

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Supercooper17 [2012-03-11 16:24:48 +0000 UTC]

so far yea

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Supercooper17 In reply to Stumm47 [2012-03-11 16:36:20 +0000 UTC]

there won't be another steam train i'm afraid

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Supercooper17 [2012-03-11 16:37:03 +0000 UTC]

what you mean? Theres a few new steam locos in the works now!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Supercooper17 In reply to Stumm47 [2012-03-11 16:40:19 +0000 UTC]

really? i never knew

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Supercooper17 [2012-03-11 17:13:01 +0000 UTC]

Never heard of the Tornado?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Supercooper17 In reply to Stumm47 [2012-03-11 17:19:17 +0000 UTC]

that was 1949

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Supercooper17 [2012-03-11 17:38:16 +0000 UTC]

Err no, the new one built in my town in 2010!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Supercooper17 In reply to Stumm47 [2012-03-11 18:33:52 +0000 UTC]

oh yeh

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Supercooper17 [2012-03-11 19:03:20 +0000 UTC]

That took 20 years to build! And theres a few other engines lined up for building too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Supercooper17 In reply to Stumm47 [2012-03-11 19:28:29 +0000 UTC]

woah

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Supercooper17 [2012-03-11 19:34:07 +0000 UTC]

steam aint dead yet mate

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Supercooper17 In reply to Stumm47 [2012-03-11 19:59:23 +0000 UTC]

its a minority now

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Supercooper17 [2012-03-11 20:19:02 +0000 UTC]

yes it is, makes it more special!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Wordworker [2012-03-09 01:32:05 +0000 UTC]

Wow!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Wordworker [2012-03-09 19:22:23 +0000 UTC]

She was impressive in her day!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

captain89 [2012-03-08 17:18:35 +0000 UTC]

Good old girl Mallard Nice shot its going in my faves :-D

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to captain89 [2012-03-08 18:35:25 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zeljko256 [2012-03-08 10:16:21 +0000 UTC]

I really like this loco... great.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to zeljko256 [2012-03-08 11:40:57 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EternalFlame1891 [2012-03-08 03:24:28 +0000 UTC]

This is sweet!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to EternalFlame1891 [2012-03-08 11:40:12 +0000 UTC]

unfortunate she'll never steam again!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EternalFlame1891 In reply to Stumm47 [2012-03-08 12:28:19 +0000 UTC]

It is very unfortunate!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to EternalFlame1891 [2012-03-08 12:32:35 +0000 UTC]

Yes!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sampug394 [2008-12-23 15:33:02 +0000 UTC]

Oh SCHNITZEL!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to Sampug394 [2008-12-24 18:54:34 +0000 UTC]

lol you like huh!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CliveAyron [2008-12-23 13:11:34 +0000 UTC]

Gorgeous shot my friend!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stumm47 In reply to CliveAyron [2008-12-23 13:28:47 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, and thanks for the fave!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

davincipoppalag [2008-12-22 23:43:10 +0000 UTC]

How beautiful she is!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Stumm47 [2008-12-22 23:13:26 +0000 UTC]

Indeed. Shame she'll never move again!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>