Comments: 86
SuperSpartanPikachu [2019-04-22 03:04:09 +0000 UTC]
It would be cool to see a proto asset of this guy because of a few reasons
reasons. 1. I think somewhere they said they didn’t know what they got until they cloned it. Meaning that one could assume a more “pure” specimen without ceratasaurs dna could’ve been conceived. This is similar to my thoughts on ingens spinosaurs, that they thought they did something wrong with the initial cloning thus adding dna from multiple organisms into its genome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SuperSpartanPikachu In reply to Taliesaurus [2019-04-23 02:49:52 +0000 UTC]
You understand what I mean? Like they cloned proto, thought that can’t be right(based on then current science) and proceeded to ad ceratasarus dna to the mix. But that raises a logical question. Are they using pure ceratasarus or ingens trex hybrid?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SuperSpartanPikachu [2019-01-20 07:30:43 +0000 UTC]
These guys are one of my favorites, always wondered how they’d look on the big screen. Hope we see em at some point in the JWE as dlc or in the movies.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
abrahan-quispe [2018-07-10 22:09:19 +0000 UTC]
Is 8% of the genome of ceratosaurus pure or is it extracted from the ceratosaurus of jurassic park?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
abrahan-quispe In reply to Taliesaurus [2018-07-18 20:24:36 +0000 UTC]
So, would it also have an albertosaurus genome?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theferretman21 [2018-06-16 20:34:20 +0000 UTC]
More news, dinosaur was never cloned and all samples were lost (I just got back an hour ago, I'm probably going to bring up a lot of stuff you already know).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Taliesaurus In reply to theferretman21 [2018-06-16 20:44:05 +0000 UTC]
i know but it does mention that the heerasaurs were alive, as were the baryonyx (on sorna) so i'm having it that only a few specimens were cloned but they ALL died out.
and i'll put that info about what happened to the embryos in the description, like i did with the edmontosaurus (variant one)!
btw, Klayton just released a really thought-provoking video-
A THOUGHT-PROVOKING QUESTION!Don't worry, I've finally got an idea for another post!
but until then, Klayton has just revealed perhaps one of his most
THOUGHT-PROVOKING videos.
And the question i have for all of you is that if these events ACTUALLY happened in the REAL WORLD, would you be on board with saving the dinosaurs?
Like if EVERY one of the "incidents" actually happened...
such as:
-the isla-nublar incident (1993)
-the attack on Cathy Bowman (early 1997)
-the San-Deigo incident (1997)
-the breaking of the gene-guard act (revealed in 2015)
-the sorna "chaos-effect" (1999-2002)
and most recently,
-the INDOMINUS INCIDENT and the pterandon-rampage (2015)
which was THREE YEARS AGO from the mount sibo eruption!
all leading up to a MINIMUM of 250 HUMAN DEATHS!
really think about how your life/personality/views would have been affected if all of these incidents had ACTUALLY happened in the past 25 years!
would you REALLY BELEIVE that these lab-made dinosaurs who (let's talk
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theferretman21 In reply to Taliesaurus [2018-06-16 20:48:12 +0000 UTC]
It labels it as inactive before, whereas both Baryonyx and Herrerosaurus were both listed as active.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Taliesaurus In reply to theferretman21 [2018-06-16 20:50:34 +0000 UTC]
well, we'll see..
as I checked a good bit of THAT file was scribbled out by some unknown ingen officals!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theferretman21 In reply to Taliesaurus [2018-06-16 21:01:11 +0000 UTC]
It still seems Proceratosaurus never got created.
2. So was the other one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Taliesaurus In reply to theferretman21 [2018-06-16 21:09:28 +0000 UTC]
2- exactly, so for now, i'm KEEPING this asset file up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theferretman21 In reply to Taliesaurus [2018-06-16 21:21:26 +0000 UTC]
Calls one thing cannon, something he doesn't like happens, makes excuse as to not change it...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Taliesaurus In reply to theferretman21 [2018-06-16 21:26:49 +0000 UTC]
well, i'm not saying that i'm saying that i'll make adjustments.
but it'll be in a little bit...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theferretman21 In reply to Taliesaurus [2018-06-16 21:28:02 +0000 UTC]
Oh, okay, I'm guessing the Metriacanthosaurus profile failed at existing then?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Taliesaurus In reply to theferretman21 [2018-06-16 21:32:51 +0000 UTC]
nope it's still there as unlike the procerato, the DNA was recovered and then cloned in JW
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theferretman21 In reply to Taliesaurus [2018-06-16 21:40:59 +0000 UTC]
I meant you said you were doing it and it failed to actually be drawn/ written.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Taliesaurus In reply to theferretman21 [2018-06-16 22:00:06 +0000 UTC]
you can understand, especiaslly in the post-feelings of fallen kinhdom.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
theferretman21 [2018-05-31 02:15:12 +0000 UTC]
Shocking news (not actually very shocking) Sue actually has no proof of being female!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Taliesaurus In reply to theferretman21 [2018-05-31 09:49:17 +0000 UTC]
neither does she have any proof of being male.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theferretman21 In reply to Taliesaurus [2018-05-31 13:29:11 +0000 UTC]
Exactly, Sue is now officially genderless, and when I looked at the article, it confused me on one part, how come animals which do have genders are said to be unneededly gendered?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Taliesaurus In reply to theferretman21 [2018-05-31 13:34:09 +0000 UTC]
true but for the MOMENT the most LIKELY thing, according to scientists is a female.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theferretman21 In reply to Taliesaurus [2018-05-31 14:29:00 +0000 UTC]
Source? Because mine says we currently have barely any evidence for gender.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theferretman21 In reply to Taliesaurus [2018-05-31 14:45:14 +0000 UTC]
That's not a source, that's telling me these sources exist...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Taliesaurus In reply to theferretman21 [2018-05-31 14:49:05 +0000 UTC]
ok then, www.inverse.com/article/24327-…
"Part of Larson’s plan is to find T. rex specimens with medullary bone, in addition to one that has been found so far, which would make it potentially possible to come to a conclusion about the shape and size of typical females. He’s also looking at collections of skeletons from birds of prey of known gender and age, in the hopes that they might also show this pattern and shore up the hypothesis by analogy."
they are still to sort this out
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
theferretman21 In reply to Taliesaurus [2018-08-19 19:51:27 +0000 UTC]
That doesn't mention which gender Sue most likely is, that just says we don't know for it based on bones alone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Taliesaurus In reply to theferretman21 [2018-09-01 09:45:24 +0000 UTC]
true but point is that the current thoery is that is likely a female, due to "her" hipbones being subtlely larger (in proportain) to other rexes
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vahzah-Dovahkiin In reply to Taliesaurus [2018-10-30 02:32:02 +0000 UTC]
Quite a bit of Sue's bones are larger than other Tyrannosaurus specimens. They had something similar to what Gustav the crocodile has. They got so big their bones actually started to change to adjust to their increased size. It's still nothing to say for sure what her gender was.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theferretman21 [2018-05-28 22:40:42 +0000 UTC]
I just realized this, but I like the different colored mouths.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Taliesaurus In reply to theferretman21 [2018-05-28 22:42:02 +0000 UTC]
what do you mean?
(just so i need the specifics)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theferretman21 In reply to Taliesaurus [2018-05-28 22:44:51 +0000 UTC]
I just like how the insides of the mouths on both genders are different colors.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>