Comments: 41
AcrocanthosaurusA In reply to grisador [2015-11-09 12:07:51 +0000 UTC]
Oxalaia couldn't have caught a 32 foot long shark.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AcrocanthosaurusA In reply to grisador [2015-11-10 20:23:52 +0000 UTC]
And plesiosaurs have such a small head they couldn't have bitten and killed a Ptychodus,the only animal that was from it's time and could kill it would be some type of mosasaur.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to AcrocanthosaurusA [2015-11-10 21:28:01 +0000 UTC]
That definitely change from species to species...
The plesiosaur's might hunt in groups; they hunt by injure their prey; there are many possible ways; just imagine...
I also meant a little ''' joke ''' in my first comment
encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/ima…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AcrocanthosaurusA In reply to grisador [2015-11-10 20:21:31 +0000 UTC]
Umm I was saying oxalaia cant hunt a shark of that size. Plus if you are smart enough you'll reaalize Ptychodus lived later than oxalaia,and in a diffrent place,and oxalaia didn't hunt in the far ocean. Onchopristis is easy to catch because it's very thin. And Spinosaurus has a top estimate of 59 feet long. Oxalaia 44. Oxalaia lived in brazil,during the Cenomanian of the Cretaceous.While Ptychodus lived from the Coniacian through to the Maastrichtian of the Cretaceous,and lived in North America,the united states.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AcrocanthosaurusA In reply to grisador [2015-11-11 14:57:25 +0000 UTC]
Umm ptychodus was much heavier then a onchopristis. Plus the Great white is much bulkier then what either Oxalaia,Suchomimus,Baryonx,Spinosaurus,Or Sigilmassasaurus hunted. The big fish spinosaurus hunted were either slim saw fish,or heavy but still small coelocanths.
Also for some reason I don't see jokes usually.
And there is no reason Plesiosaurs would need to hunt a mollusk eating shark.
Mostly they were small fish hunters,mostly enchodus.
The mosasaurus were fully cabable of hunting ptychodus though.
Prognathodon,Liodon,Tylosaurus,Etc. Probably not platecarpus although.
Im surprised you didn't list Brachuachenuis in there.
It lived around the time of the inland sea and was 32 feet long and was a pliosaur.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to AcrocanthosaurusA [2015-11-13 08:48:24 +0000 UTC]
Do you even know what ochopristis, mawsonia are ?
Ochnopristis was a both large and fast\agile fish; its anything but slow.
Mawsonia on the other hand was a heavy league; its probably a very strong cocelanth.
I am not sure 4-6 or bigger meter fish could deemed 'small'
Oh; these claws and this big animal can definitely hunt a pytchodus; if they lived in same time same habitat.
orig03.deviantart.net/c1f8/f/2…
38.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lrq…
That depends entirely on which species of plesiosaur is; and the type of shark
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AcrocanthosaurusA In reply to grisador [2015-11-14 00:51:52 +0000 UTC]
Well the only plesiosaurs I can think of being able to do it would be elasmosaurid 12-21 meter long plesiosaurs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to AcrocanthosaurusA [2015-11-16 16:13:33 +0000 UTC]
Did you watch the BBC's dinosaur planet ?
In that show a species of elasmosauroid can capable of hunting small to medium sized sharks; its all about the size and agility of plesiosaur
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AcrocanthosaurusA In reply to grisador [2015-11-16 21:20:10 +0000 UTC]
That shark was the size of kimmerosaurus's mouth though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to AcrocanthosaurusA [2015-11-18 12:53:57 +0000 UTC]
Think similar to how killer whales hunt blue whale or their infants; by packs with injuring them
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AcrocanthosaurusA In reply to grisador [2015-11-18 20:30:45 +0000 UTC]
But plesiosaurs aren't one of the most intelligent animals on the planet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AcrocanthosaurusA In reply to grisador [2015-11-25 20:31:10 +0000 UTC]
How about a pod of highly intelligent 40 foot long whales.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to AcrocanthosaurusA [2015-11-28 17:10:28 +0000 UTC]
Who ? Megalodons ?!
No shark species show no signs of intelligence to gather as family units or social groups.
The sharks only gather together as simple ''units'' or so called 'gangs'. These extremely simple (so called) groups; only gather\drawn together to eat. But this eating done entirely by individualy; and if even one shark injures; it (mostly; generally) immeaditely cannibalized by its specimens.
So Social Whales >>> Very simple Shark ''units''
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AcrocanthosaurusA In reply to grisador [2015-11-29 13:36:42 +0000 UTC]
Yet it's possible. And megalodon is pretty sophisticated. for a shark. Never underestimate a animal that has survived over 400 mya.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to AcrocanthosaurusA [2015-12-04 15:58:50 +0000 UTC]
Well; its pretty sad sharks only shined 'a few' times...
But reptiles, other fishes, even mammalians usually supress & prey on them...
Buuuut; almost all of the Predators went extinct while sharks didn't !!
*Shark Thug Life !*
encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/ima…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AcrocanthosaurusA In reply to grisador [2015-12-19 15:55:03 +0000 UTC]
What about the arthropods. Also sharks were in the middle ground in my opinion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Pr0teusUnbound [2015-06-07 14:49:08 +0000 UTC]
isnt there a placoderm with the same generic name?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Traheripteryx [2015-05-31 14:57:48 +0000 UTC]
Hätte nicht gedacht, dass es so riesige Hybodontier gab! Was 'n Brocken!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MrKrookodile [2015-05-18 12:01:06 +0000 UTC]
Nice! It ate seaturtles and big fishes, right? Or was it friendly and only ate seaweed?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex [2015-05-17 13:37:06 +0000 UTC]
impressive.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
herofan135 [2015-05-17 12:20:44 +0000 UTC]
Woah, I'm really digging this project so far! Really awesome sharks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1