HOME | DD
TFDs-stamps-r-us — creationstamp
Published: 2008-12-20 01:11:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 2910; Favourites: 131; Downloads: 38
Redirect to original
Description
(relocated stamp orianal comments will be lost sorry to anyone who wanted to read them)Firstly BEST LOOKING STAMP YET ;D!!!
ok basicly I compleatly support "the idea" of creation (aka: the world was made by god.)
I don't belive in evalotion an have every right not to as it is aturlly just a thery not a fact and there is not real poof, there is in fact More proof that the storys of the bible are true than there are of evalation is true.
Also I know it has crosses on and I know that the idea of creation is not just a christian idea but I am a christian not anything else. I belive what my god said because I trust him and him alone and not what any other has said sorry if you think that what ever of me but if I did I could not really call myself christain beacuse I wouldn't really belive in chirst or what he said (he refusers to the old scripters many times including the ones moses wrote aka genisess.) and I could not really belive in why he died because i would not belive in the fall so why would I need him to die for me to be saved?
also I would not really belive in god because I wouldn't belive what he has said.
so i hope you can see if I didn't belive him I personly couldn't really call myself a christain.
I don't care what the goverment and media belive
I know god is there
and I belive in him,
I'm not afraid to say it.
If you to belive that we are not here just by chance and trust and belive that what god said was true then please feel more than free to use this .
-(-comments are discoraued i more than likely wont ever read them!
not cause i don't care i just proberly wont have time or enrgey to if it's like what it was on my real acount.
I am sad to move this stamp as some of the origanl challaging comments where really good, so sorry.
p.s. I'm not atacking what you belive! ... I just don't belive it! So please don't abuse me. thank you! -)-
Related content
Comments: 52
It absolutely ENRAGES me when people say that evolution is "just a theory". A theory is based on EVIDENCE. You guys need to start carrying a dictionary around, leave the bible at home for a day or two.
I believe that God created evolution. The idea that God made the earth in seven days... I don't know HOW that idea even started. There is proof that it took billions of years for earth to form. I also hate it when people say, in defense of creation, "oh, really? How can something be created from nothing?" Seriously? If God made the earth in seven days, making things magically appear by saying "let there be light" or, "let there be animals", wouldn't HE be creating something from nothing?
I believe that God worked on the major project of future earth for billions of years, using gravity and time to put the earth together piece by piece. Then he used the resources he had, combining different chemicals and stuff to create the first bacteria and microorganisms, and eventually shaping them and improving them over the millions of years to become what we are today- humans. Of course, some life forms took other routes, such as birds, other mammals, fish, insects, and reptiles.
basically, I'm saying that God is a scientist.
I know, it's complicated, but it's what I believe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I think adding crosses on this stamp is a bad idea, Christians aren't the only religion to believe in creation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You have the right to believe what you want, but I think evolution is one of God's greatest inventions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That's not a good argument.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I made this comment in 2014. Like 3 years ago. Piss off.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Well thats what happens when you make a bad comment
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That was made years ago? Maybe you should read the dates to save you from being a dumbass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hey, you are the one who made the comment. You have to expect responses even when it is old, especially when the comment itself is especially hateful and condescending.
Plus If the comment bugs you so much, why not just hide it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Again, it was made YEARS ago. If you really go out of your way to respond to a 4 year old comment, maybe you should look in the mirror and rethink your life
Plus why the fuck would I do that? I made a lot of comments in the past that I now disagree with. I'm not going to hunt them down to try and find them. Maybe just ignore old comments and shut up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I dunno, I don't think responding to an old comment is anywhere near as foolish as getting bent out of shape over it.
Or you can hide the comment right after someone responds to it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're incredibly stupid. I don't care about this stamp or my original comment. I hardly care about this conversation. You are just looking for a fight, and that makes you a pathetic idiot.
I am going to ignore you now, because you are going to just try and make an argument out of nothing. Please get friends.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Don't need to be rude about it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Read the date before commenting then please.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I believe that God created Evolution, if you believe that he made the world why put limitations on what he can do?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Evolution is a theory, yes. But a theory has evidence and has not been disproved. A theory is not just an idea. Gravity is a theory, and you Christians weren't always so open to that, either. Creation, on the other hand, is barely a hypothesis. It has no proof, other than one old book which does not count as proof. The bible contains about as much truth as Lord of the Rings, so there is no reason to take the bible as proof for how the universe got here. It disturbs me that people want to be so stupid, and it disturbs me that this mythology has come into present day. I believe Scientology to be more likely than creation and it can be said that Scientologists do not have an imaginary friend.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I can agree that evolution is much like gravity and germ theory, however your arguments against religion on some confirmed-to-be fictional books is just terrible. The Lord of the Rings was written by a devout Catholic Christian, and has put a lot of Christian themes to it, it's also No True Scotsman to compare that fictional book to a religious book.
Also, "imaginary friend" isn't even a good argument anymore.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Of course evolution is a theory. But it's not just/i> a theory. Contrary to popular usage, a theory is something's that's been proven. Like gravity. There's also laws, which are the same thing, but different. A hypothesis is something that hasn't been proven. Like...tachyons. Or gravitons. Or God. God can't be proved or disproved, so technically speaking, he's a hypothesis.
...I feel like a genius for saying that. Also an idiot.
I support creation, as well, by the way. I support creating art and music and books and intelligence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
...That was not supposed to be in all italics.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
well you obviously don't believe in Grammer or Spelling as well as science.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Of course Evolution is a Theory. Whoever says otherwise is an idiot or uneducated.
Also, Evolution doesn't say that Humans Evolved from primates, only that we are related to them, just like we are related to sea squirts, seaweed and bacteria.
Of course you aren't afraid to say you are Christian. You won't be burned at the stake or hunted down like an animal of you say it 
There isn't proof of a higher deity either, but couldn't evolution be a way of God creating Earth? It sure makes more sense then "one hundred rabbits? Oh, that's easy! I'll just create a hundred foxes out of thin air!"
Make sure to remember that Darwin was a strong Christian. He didn't make fun of Christians, he merely wanted to explain God's work in a more logical way.
In the past Christians were so sure that the Earth was flat, that everything revolved around Earth, that the planet is only ten thousand years old, that disabled people, non-caucasion people, women, left-handed people, mentally ill, the diseased, single mothers, orphans and lower class people were an affront to God, and worthy of killing like the "Demons" they were.
Not all evolutionists are out to ruin your belief. We must all remember the good and bad to all theories or beliefs.
(I would like to point out that science also has its dark side, but I always felt more at home with science than with religion that to me signifies hate, segregation and alienation)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's not how it works, no one thinks foxes where made out of thin air.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Here are some facts on evolution: [link]
I'm not attempting to change your mind or convince you of anything, it just most creationists I meet have no understanding of evolution, like you show. For example evolution does not say everything happened by chance. It is also not a belief, it is something people agree with. And it is a scientific theory, as opposed to the lamence term of theory, which are two different terms. I won't challenge you're asserted proof of the bible, i just wanted to chow some corrections to be made, and misconceptions you might have on evolution.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I had switched to my new profile, here you go [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I certainly do support it--both God's creation and that human creation is an offshoot of His ability--and this is a pretty stamp. ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
1. I think you should look up what the scientific definition of the word "theory" is. Evolution is both a theory and a fact. What you're thinking of is a hypothesis...that isn't what a theory is.
2. There's pretty much zero debate within the scientific community about evolution, almost all scientists in the relevant fields accept it. It's only debated within the general population because it conflicts with religious beliefs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1. It's not a fact
2. She/He never said there was debate, she said she disagreed with the scientists who said evolution is real.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1. Yes it is. If you don't believe me then feel free to take anti-biotics from 20 years ago and see how well they work.
2. That doesn't change the fact that it is real.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1. What do anti-biotics have to do with anything?!?
2. Ok then prove it. Oh wait, YOU CAN'T!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
1) as vulgar as Werewolfofthewaer ha immeadiately become, he is right. Evolution is a scientific theory which is different from a regular theory. And antibiotic have a lot to do with evolution, evolution gives usunderstandingwhy we need monthly and yearly vaccines, why men have nipples, why there's cancer, why a lot of things happen the way they happen. It's even used to breed animals, that wy championship race horses are constantly breeded: so they have championship of spring. It also explain why some babies are sometimes born without skin, eyes, legs fused together, and hwy if your mom or dad has high blood pressure, there a chance you might get it as well. My family has a long history of bunions, and I got them too. It also explains mental illnesses and how to solve them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
1. Because bacteria has evolved to become resistant to anti-biotics forcing us to develop new ones, dumb shit.
2. I don't have to because scientists already have. Go read a book that isn't the bible.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1. Bacteria "evolving" to be resistant to antibiotics does not prove evolution. Bacteria have not turned into anything other bacteria, they have not turned into viruses or even evolved to become a new kind of species or kind. Evolution claims that creatures evolve from one kind into another, which is why we are supposedly related to primates through a common ancestor. Bacteria can only do with what it already has. The bacteria that survived an anti-biotic already had the resistance available while other bacteria did not and died off. However, if we entered a new kind of anti-biotic, those resistant bacteria would die off, not create a new strain for resistance. If some bacteria survive, it is because they already had a resistance to this new anti-biotic.
Anti-biotics are made to careful to pinpoint certain bacteria, lest they destroy the bacteria, some that your body actually needs. Otherwise, we probably could easily kill off all the harmful bacteria, but also end up killing us or seriously harming us because all/most bacteria would be gone. We have not created an anti-biotic that can attack only the "bad" bacteria, we can only create an anti-biotic given with what information we can learn about the "bad" bacteria. If we miss something that other "bad" bacteria have, those other bacteria will survive because they already had a a resistant strain.
I may have some misunderstanding of antibiotics and the bacteria were are trying to be rid of. But one thing is certain: bacteria are still bacteria. Macro evolution cannot be proven with something that continues to stay the same type of bacteria. Hey, if that bacteria turns into a virus or something no-bacteria, let me know.
2. If you mean ones that shows a picture of "evolution of man", I am curious how we were able to know the the color and how much hair each "evolved being" had, considering all we had were fossilized bones that provide no DNA reference, which we need to determine things like: sex, color, shape, how much hair/feathers/scales cover the body, etc. Since, you know, the DNA should have been gone since it should not be able to last hundreds of thousands of years.
I am also curious how we know how old the earth is, since no one was there billions/millions of years ago to tell us. So, we must assume the earth is very old, if we are to think the creatures on this earth evolved over time. But what does the test show us? How do we know it does not need calibration? What about contamination? Not to mention all those things that evolutionists claim young-earth Creationists "must do wrong" to prove a young earth. How about we ask the same questions to evolutionist scientists.
You could try reading some articles about Creation, particularly by Answers in Genesis and compare with evolutionary articles. I have been showered with evolutionary beliefs for many years of my life, never have I seen one kind of animal turn into another (as generations go by). Never have I seen "undeniable proof" of evolution.
After all the tests we have done with Fruit Flies, you'd think after millions/billions of generations, they would have found a way to break through the container we torture them in... or at least turn into non-Fruit flies. Never happened when I did that test and I certainly have not read about any. Fruit flies are still Fruit flies, and still we think that is evidence for evolution when they have mutations that are making them blind, wingless, or die quickly? I have yet to see a good mutation.
The best evolutionists have is that micro-evolution occurs, which young-earth Creationists would agree with. You know, the kind of micro-evolution that has made all those different breeds of dogs, different colors/patterns on cats, etc. But no macro-evolution through microevolution has been observed or tested. No Chow has bred with a German Shepard and gotten a cow, let alone a non-dog. But micro-evolution is no more evidence for molecules-to-man evolution that evidence for a young-earth.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
"there is in fact More proof that the storys of the bible are true than there are of evalation is true"
Nope. Evolution? Genetic bottle necks, Gene mutation ect.
Bible? Words?
hmmm
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NO way
i don't believe in that
i believe creation
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well you just sad all that Biological stuff was awesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oh sorry
i just went back and read what youwrote
i read wrong
los siento
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i did
were you wrote
evaluation, i thought you wrote
evolution
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>