HOME | DD

The-Definition — Winter Dew

Published: 2006-01-02 04:00:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 615; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 127
Redirect to original
Description um, hope you like
print available
Related content
Comments: 21

PreservedNightmare [2006-01-30 04:59:00 +0000 UTC]

Nice. I have an obsession for water, and I must say that this is a beautiful example of nature and water.

I love the colors, and how close this shot is. I think the focus is great. Basically, I just think the whole shot is awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SilbererDrache [2006-01-08 04:02:08 +0000 UTC]

you're my hero.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Definition In reply to SilbererDrache [2006-01-09 17:53:16 +0000 UTC]

why?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SilbererDrache In reply to The-Definition [2006-01-10 00:25:19 +0000 UTC]

your phography. among other reasons i guess.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sketchingheaven [2006-01-06 09:58:53 +0000 UTC]

i like the focus. nice colors, too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lepizzagirl [2006-01-02 16:31:10 +0000 UTC]

very nicely done. I love how crisp your focused image is... Would this be considered "macro"? I am new to photography so I tend to ask stupid questions.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Definition In reply to lepizzagirl [2006-01-03 17:40:09 +0000 UTC]

yes, this is macro. more accurately would be "super" macro, becuase this was about only 1 inch way from my lense.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lepizzagirl In reply to The-Definition [2006-01-04 21:52:00 +0000 UTC]

Wow. That's pretty incredible. *sigh* Someday, maybe, I'll have the money to invest in a good camera that can take shots that close. Phew, this was really impressive.

Do you find that you have to be absolutely still or the focused image blurs? I find that even if my camera is on a tripod I get a lot of blurring simply from the pressure of my finger snapping the shot and how little that moves the camera. Frustrating...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Definition In reply to lepizzagirl [2006-01-05 00:26:52 +0000 UTC]

i only spent $200 on my digital camera, its nowhere near "good" as far as cameras go.
yes, you have to be very still while taking pictures in low light. low light can also mean any lighting inside, its just not as bright as the sun. any shots under 1/60 of a second can come out blurred just by your heart beat.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lepizzagirl In reply to The-Definition [2006-01-05 15:54:41 +0000 UTC]

huh. Food for thought. Thank you. I'll definitely keep that in mind next time I am shooting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Spankreas [2006-01-02 10:03:56 +0000 UTC]

it's so.... pure... better than mountain dew any day!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fufu-pupu [2006-01-02 08:31:14 +0000 UTC]

wow, very pretty!
nice shot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BassDerek [2006-01-02 07:24:10 +0000 UTC]

neat capture of the water and blueness.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ShameShowsGuiltiness [2006-01-02 06:26:25 +0000 UTC]

this is amazing.
i'm so inlove

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sexualnintendo [2006-01-02 05:43:56 +0000 UTC]

holy shit, it looks fake its so good haha. this is awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rinnalynette [2006-01-02 05:40:56 +0000 UTC]

great shot. The tonal range is a little bright for me, but I like the composition very much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DemonLog [2006-01-02 05:11:17 +0000 UTC]

I like the slingshot/harp shape to the focused material. Very nice capture!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jael555 [2006-01-02 04:34:54 +0000 UTC]

you know we're a sucker for those blues, don't you? anyway, beautiful focus, beautiful background. I really love the background for some reason. nice work, as always.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

vinil [2006-01-02 04:30:05 +0000 UTC]

It grabbed me at first sight...
love it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nicko-D [2006-01-02 04:28:38 +0000 UTC]

Very nice shot.
Very nice colours.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shelks [2006-01-02 04:24:55 +0000 UTC]

that's a cool capture

👍: 0 ⏩: 0