HOME | DD
TheBoogie — Genderless
Published: 2012-02-28 02:32:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 5681; Favourites: 59; Downloads: 80
Redirect to original
Description
30% value practice.20% facial construction practice.
20% quick anatomy practice.
20% irony.
9% in-joke.
1% evil.
99% hot gas.
Related content
Comments: 92
So.... Meloetta is asexual..... Perhaps.... She Reproduces through... BUDDING!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It doesn't reproduce at all. And stop calling it "she"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"She" (It/whatever) is a NON-EXISTENT, FICTIONAL entity, THEREFORE any one of us are perfectly free to 'speculate' and come up with whatever/however many theories or "facts" we please~
Also I don't think you really have the authority to just order me to stop referring to it as a "she" (with the above statement in mind especially) let alone do it by responding to a comment that was not even addressed to you~ Or maybe my comment offended you by making you imagine your sweet, innocent little Meloetta sprouting (BUDDING) a second head out of her neck and you just had to let me know in one way or another~
Oh, I also kind of like the other guy's headcannon about retractable genitalia, Seems interesting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It doesn't matter. Meloetta is genderless. Case closed
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IT is GENDERLESS!!! IT cannot breed, IT is shown to not have a gender in the games, IT is GENDERLESS!!! Not "she"! IT!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You say it like it matters~
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Because it does matter
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes, it does... and you do realize that adding a tilde to the end of a sentence is supposed to mean flirting?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I bet you're REALLY getting off on that one aren't you.
Also, Do the terms Imagination, Freedom of thought or Fictional species mean anything to you? How-About creativity or imagination? (Judging by your persistence on this matter I am going to assume Not-Much.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Imagination, but that's about it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well how can imagination mean something to you when creativity means nothing?
The point I am trying to make is that people (like me and plenty of others) have a right to their own thoughts and opinions and there is absolutely nothing you can do about it.
You do not posses the authority to control such things and you are making a huge mistake by thinking that you do.
I am not trying to change your mind but I am telling you that any attempts (By YOU) to change mine are futile, "Meloetta" is a "Pokémon" (A fictional creature that does not exist), 'She' may be defined as a "Genderless species that cannot reproduce" but frankly neither me nor plenty of other people give even the slightest damn, If we want to characterise "it" as a "she" we WILL and all you can do is sit and watch it happen.
Personally I also like to picture her being capable of fluent English.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If you do that while talking to me, don't expect me not to correct you
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Correct" what exactly? If you are referring to freedom of thought then it is you that requires correction.
I also wouldn't EVEN be speaking to you right now if you didn't choose to bitch about something as absolutely meaningless as whether or not Meloetta has a gender, In response to a comment that was not even addressed to you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I will correct your incorrectness
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You do realize you are wasting both our time, correct?
The only reason I am not ignoring this asininity is because I find you and your warped opinions/Hilariously closed-mindedness amusing.
You are so naive to think you can just order someone to stop thinking in a certain way, Do you have any control in your life because you must be really sad if you are going to try and assert your dominance over a few absolute strangers in the comment section on some Pokémon image.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I already said that I will not order you to stop, I will just simply correct you
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Maybe you should try "correcting" someone who will ACTUALLY listen to your poképrude bullshit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I can't. No one listens to reason nowadays
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's because it's not reason, You're just being a closed-minded hack.
"Reason" would be thinking to yourself, "Well there seem to be lots of people who like to characterise Meloetta as a female even though it's technically genderless. I personally don't think it's correct but I will just make an idiot of myself by trying to stomp on their imaginations and rubbing my ass all over their oppinions.".
You saying I am incorrect for calling Meloetta a "she" is basically like me going up to the creators of the "Pokémon" franchise and telling THEM that THEY are incorrect because these 'Pocket-Monsters' if-you-will are scientifically impossible and basically jokes of biology.
You see the difference?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It is reason. That would be like me saying Technicolor ponies are cool. Oh wait, people already say that. Humanity is going to shit nowadays. It doesn't matter that Pokémon makes no sense. It's INCORRECT to say Meloetta is female, because it's not. That would be like saying Mewtwo is male and Mew is female. They're not. That would be like saying all Gardevoir are female. They're NOT! It's incorrect! And incorrectness should be corrected! I don't give a FUCK if you don't listen, but I WILL correct you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Techni-colour Ponies" honestly make me want to fly into a horrible fit of rage sometimes, And I MUST agree with you when you say the world is "going to shit" these-days.
However you act like it is the end of the world over something with absolutely no life relevance ( like Meloetta's Gender) and I honestly find it humorous at-best.
You act like it is some horrible crime against humanity that someone calls "it" a she or decides to put a big pair of tits on it or whatever and it is just funny to me.
You are entertaining me, Not giving me any kind of useful information and by saying that you WILL correct me is basically just saying that you are perfectly apt to waste your time AND other people's alike.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I WILL waste my time, and I DON'T care. I'm glad someone actually agrees with me on that though
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well have fun with that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm just tired of Poképhiles...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You could have picked a worse "Poképhile" to bitch at,
I am only attracted to feminine, bipedal 'pokémon' that aren't covered in fur (Like Meloetta or Gardevoir) and honestly I am not even in the fandom (My relationship with Meloetta Etc is a little awkward and superficial at best, In the way that I didn't even realize "she" was a "Pokémon" until after a couple weeks of being attracted to "her", And I would rather just imagine them being some kind of intelligent extraterrestrial life before I admit to myself that they are fucking pokémon...)
To say the least, The day I start fantasizing about porking a freaking Pikachu or some kind of furry cat-human hybrid will be the day I just go ahead an off myself.
I do not consider myself to be a 'Furry' or a 'Poképhile (Atleast not a hard-core one), Just a xenophile and a couple "Pokémon" happened to step in my path.
If you want to go pester some 'Poképhile' about how disgusting they are then go find one of those little furry pieces of shit that want to force themselves upon a freaking Pikachu, Not me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
In the Pokémon world, Pokémon are animals. Meloetta is an animal. Gardevoir is an animal. Fur or no fur, they are ANIMALS! You are attracted to ANIMALS! And allow me to say this: Gardevoir doesn't technically even HAVE a body in this dimension. Gardevoir feels NO gravitational pull. Gardevoir has to use its psychic powers to keep itself on the ground. It is in the Amorphous egg group. Therefore, Gardevoir is basically a Muk. Still attracted to it? Let me go even further! Gardevoir has no body. Therefore no tits, no vag, NOTHING that's prominent on common fanart. Gardevoir reproduces in a different way. The same way a Muk would. If you're STILL attracted, well then I dunno what to tell ya. You're weird. Fantasizing about Pikachu is no worse than fantasizing about Gardevoir. Fantasizing about Meloetta is just stupid since it doesn't have a gender
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Actually there's a library in the 4th gen games where in the japanese version there's a book saying something about it wasn't a difference between human and pokemon...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
that's about bonding and relationships but okay
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You can never understand don't you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What is there to understand?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
We call her what we want and its okay if you're against the fact that people are calling it a "she".meloetta looks really feminine and that's why people say its female even tho its genderless. Just don't freak out about it, you might disagree with people and its okay but, you need to accept other people's opinions even if you don't like them. Be lucky that im not a mean bastard like some other people.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Alright, so I'm gonna call you a piece of trash because I can. By your logic, that works, right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Humans are Also animals.
It is not a question of whether or not it can be explicitly classified as a "human being", It is a question of sentience and the ability to consent and express itself to the "human" in question and vis-versa.
Especially as far as my own personal "fantasies" and fascinations go considering as deviant from the whole "Pokémon" thing they actually are.
I must also ask; What part of "I am not even in the Pokémon fandom" do you not seem to understand?
I know I hardly understand ANY of that Pokébabble bullshit you just threw at me in your defence (Or offence really), I don't know what-the-hell a Muk is supposed to be (I am assuming it is another 'pokémon' you are comparing Gardevoir to), I don't know the "egg-types" or their "stats" or any of that rubbish.
"Meloetta" (or more recently mentioned "Gardevoir") were just images that I made into 'something more' within the confines of my own mind, as-far as I am concerned.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Well you shouldn't have even gotten into this conversation then
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Technically speaking, yes. But do normal people fuck other animals? No! They don't! You can have all the weird, twisted fantasies you want... I guess... but it's not fact, and will you STOP misspelling "defense"? It's spelled "defense" DEFENSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSE!!! Really bothers me. If you don't know what Muk is, then you need not to be in the Pokémon fandom. Go around on bulbapedia for a bit and get yourself familiar with some Pokémon. At least the original 151. Thank you and have a nice time there
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I kind of noticed the "defense" thing after I posted the reply but as much as it seemed worth mentioning to you, It is totally irrelevant to the argument, ESPECIALLY if one takes into account the multiple times YOU forgot to put periods on the end of sentences.
Like I said I am NOT truly in the "Pokémon" fandom, And I am not exactly keen on integrating myself into it any farther than I already have.
That being said; I am NOT going to bother going to that 'Bulbapedia' place and familiarizing myself with any more of the "Pokémon" in question or any of the other principles of the series/franchise because Frankly I don't care about ANY of that information that seems important to you.
And these things you call FACTS are based off of information concerning FICTIONAL creatures in a FICTIONAL world within a FICTIONAL universe, Therefore as much as you like to say otherwise they are not truly facts and ultimately mean nothing to me.
I also find it funny how you say this stuff like I would actually go out and stick my dick in some wild animal, Does the term "FANTASY" mean anything to you?
I would also recommend reading this [Journal Entry On 'Poképhilia' And Ethics] before jumping to any more conclusions on my views in this matter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Didn't I already reply to this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If I can't change you opinion on this bullshit then oh-well, But don't think so highly of yourself to think that you can change MINE.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm not trying to change your opinion, Mr. Italics
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Then why do you persist to drag this bullshit on any longer?
I am going to put an end to this now;
Both of us should be perfectly aware that this is a dead-end argument, You can't change my opinion and I can't change yours.
BUT Seeing how unreasonable you really are I am sure this argument will continue yet even farther past it's expiration.
And honestly typing in a comment box that seems to constantly grow smaller is getting rather annoying.
You are more than welcome to reply to this but unless it really catches my interest this whole conversation will die there. And be yet more litter on an image that belongs to someone who probably has absolutely NO interest in this rubbish.
So YOU can decide if we are actually going to collide with this dead-end, you butthurt little pokéfag.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't remember where or why this even started. I have NO idea why you're calling me a Pokéfag, but I probably did something bad. Idk
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I've lost all respect for anyone in the Sonic fandom. Most of them are preteens that have nothing else to focus on but a sub-par game about a blue hedgehog. So any argument this loser makes is completely void.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hahahaha, That fandom was always a sort of furry-infested hell hole that I would want no part of..
And I know the argument is void, I'm just reaping in some cheap amusement.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Meloetta, like all Pokemon, have retractable privates. Or something. IDK
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Meloetta, like everything hat's genderless, have NO privates
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You have your headcanon I have mine
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's not a headcanon. It's pure fact because that's literally the definition of genderless
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
You can have privates and still be genderless. This is because gender is not a synonym for sex. Gender is about the way you feel inside. Therefore, gender is not defined by genitals, wich means you can be genderless and having genitalia at the same time and vice-versa.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>