HOME | DD
TheDubstepAddict — Arambourgia philadelphiae
#azhdarchid #palaeoart #paleoart #paleoartists #pterodactyl #pterodactylus #pterosaur #pterosauria #pterosaurs #pterodactyloid #pterodactyls #pterosaurｓｃｕｌｐｔｕｒｅｄｉｎｏｓａｕｒpalaeontology #pterosaurur #pterosaurus #paleoarte #paleoartist #pterosaurier #paleoartista #idontknowwhattotag #tagsarestupid #paleoartism #pterosaurlike #idontknowhowhashtagswork #pterosaursdidntskimfeedpleasestopdepictingthemassuch #paleoartistic #pterosaursaur #paleoartisticdrawing #idontknowwhattoputdownanymoresoletsendthisshitxd #paleoartysta #pterosaurmonster #arambourgia #arambourgiaphiladelphiae
Published: 2017-04-28 22:48:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 1093; Favourites: 39; Downloads: 5
Redirect to original
Description
Now with a legit-lengh neck. This thing is terrifying.Related content
Comments: 69
Well, David peters is a great artist. But not so much paleontologist.
There are similar looking pterosaurs even more bizarrely reconstructed out there
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, I know. I wish he would listen to actual paleontology instead of doing his own misbeliefs, such as pterosaurs being non-archosaurs, pterosaurs being bipedal instead of quadrupedal most of the time, and also Andrewsarchus being a giant Tenrec.
Oh, right on that, like yours. I think your reconstructions do look bizarre, and I do like bizarre-looking Pterosaurs as well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I got an idea for this guy, a huge mane of thick pycnofibres to keep away predators
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Aerodynamics :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I guess I exaggerated, I was thinking something more like a slightly thicker version of the thing old world vultures have going on (but with the head still covered in pycnofibres)carolinabirds.org/Images5LG/Vu… also going around the front of
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kinda like the mane of the challenge
O_O
I suddenly think I know what the mane on the undescribed raptor was for
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That was just normal neck floof though
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Uuhhhhhhhhhhhhh no
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
have you ever looked at a bird? upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia… www.themodernapprentice.com/go…
or any reconstructions based on birds
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That is floof, but not that much
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'd say the fossil has less, not even accounting for how the feathers were probably flattened against the ground making a wider imprint
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Ok Mr. Bakkrr
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
so you think the feathers stayed perfectly three dimensional after it died?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, but I do think they couldn't have radiated that wide without being verry fluffy before it died
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
well yeah, but it's still a normal amount of fluff either way
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Like three or four comments back
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
An actual picture of a living animal with such a fluffy neck?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The eagle and the kea, which again are about the same as this
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
just scroll up....
here comments.deviantart.com/1/6776…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
O
No dat not floof
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
that's like literally the same level of floof
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What...? Just look
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It CaNt Be nO I DonT WAnna BeLiVE
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
.... okay David Peters....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I really like the way you mark your animals, it got this tribal feel to it.....
-imma steal-
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>