Comments: 66
AnneAvila [2017-11-07 18:44:25 +0000 UTC]
I'd like to purchase one of your prints but can't figure out how I do that. I'm, looking for a 5x7.
Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheStrangeGirl091200 [2017-05-01 11:04:04 +0000 UTC]
This artwork makes me think I haven't begin to study his philosophy yet... 😅. I'm not a good student!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheStrangeGirl091200 In reply to Theophilia [2017-05-04 17:47:16 +0000 UTC]
Few days ago my Philosohy teacher's intern explained us his philosophy very well: he mentioned Summa Theologia but not The One and the Many
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Theophilia In reply to TheStrangeGirl091200 [2017-05-05 18:21:24 +0000 UTC]
The One and the Many is a modern introduction to Thomistic thought, written by a professor at Notre Dame University named W. Norris Clarke, though I think he died back in 2008.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheSinSquad [2017-03-10 01:27:57 +0000 UTC]
This is beautiful can you draw one of saint Thomas More please?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
TheSinSquad In reply to TheSinSquad [2017-03-10 01:37:44 +0000 UTC]
Nevermind I just now saw that you've already made a picture of Saint Thomas More. It's amazing by the way I love the dedication you put into all of your masterpieces.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shadowwolf4545 [2016-08-01 23:30:55 +0000 UTC]
"The dumb Sicilian Ox whose bellowing will be heard throughout the land" A very good portrayal of him I must say.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ethawyn [2015-10-10 19:39:06 +0000 UTC]
This is gorgeous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
x-o-the-revolution [2014-12-19 17:56:01 +0000 UTC]
He's perfect!!!!!!! Perfect image, that's how I picture him (though people say he was heavy-set and awkward)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TribalGraces [2013-11-01 17:14:30 +0000 UTC]
This is such a beautifully painted work. I bet it's even more gorgeous in real life where the gold leaf can shine.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DCJBeers [2013-07-26 01:35:07 +0000 UTC]
He was a great Dominican Saint for our time, what a lovely job you have done
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Basileon [2013-06-13 18:18:24 +0000 UTC]
This is a beautiful icon, thanks for sharing this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rcsi1 [2013-02-04 18:02:31 +0000 UTC]
I swear, your work is just getting better and better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mandinga91 [2013-02-01 20:16:44 +0000 UTC]
one of the father of apologetics,christian philosophy and a lot of things ..soo great that you could submited!great deviation!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mandinga91 In reply to Theophilia [2013-02-12 23:50:43 +0000 UTC]
yes he is!you are welcome friend!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BronzeLion [2013-02-01 13:43:19 +0000 UTC]
The finest patron saint of our university and a light for the Church.
Thanks for sharing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Peekeeboo [2013-01-31 11:37:46 +0000 UTC]
A wonderful icon of a very special saint! His Wisdom will last through the ages!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Versipelles [2013-01-31 09:27:33 +0000 UTC]
I generally love your work, but this particular piece, although beautiful, is — well, almost too beautiful: beautiful in the wrong way. If it were not for the conventional attributes (and the label), one wouldn’t take it for a St. Thomas at all, but for St. Hyacinth or some younger Dominican.
One may conveniently quote GKC: “Saint Thomas was a huge heavy bull of a man, fat and slow and quiet … The appearance or bodily presence of Saint Thomas Aquinas is really easier to resurrect than that of many who lived before the age of portrait painting. … (H)is stature was more remarked than his stoutness; but, above all, that his head was quite powerful enough to dominate his body. And his head was of a very real and recognisable type, to judge by the traditional portraits and the personal descriptions. It was that sort of head with the heavy chin and jaws, the Roman nose and the big rather bald brow, which, in spite of its fullness, gives also a curious concave impression of hollows here and there, like caverns of thought. Napoleon carried that head upon a short body. Mussolini carries it today, upon a rather taller but equally active one. It can be seen in the busts of several Roman Emperors, and occasionally above the shabby shirt-front of an Italian waiter; but he is generally a head waiter.”
This is very fine, but I know you can do better. Cui multum datum est, multum quæretur ab eo ; et cui commendaverunt multum, plus petent ab eo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Theophilia In reply to Versipelles [2013-02-12 22:39:15 +0000 UTC]
Hahah, it's actually interesting that you remark on this. I have my own various reasons for having done what I did--which I shall explain presently--but first I must add that I was actually reading G.K. Chesterton's biography of St. Thomas Aquinas at the time, and that very paragraph that you quoted actually inspired me in terms of the saint's physical appearance. The references I used were, indeed, from Napoleon and Mussolini, so I hunted for various portraits of them to use as references. My idea in depicting him like this (as, indeed, I do with all of the saints I have so far depicted) is that I imagine them in the icon as being in Heaven (hence, the gold background, symbolizing eternal light in iconography). And I also think that in Heaven we won't look *quite* how we look on earth, which is to say, that we will look more like ourselves (indeed, the most like ourselves, because we will fully be ourselves, and our souls will not be veiled behind our body as on earth, but will indeed mirror and show forth the soul even more clearly. It'll be like wearing our souls on our sleeves. ) I apologize if I have not expressed myself well, but I do hope you understand what I mean. In any case, this is how I was hoping to depict St. Thomas Aquinas--young, more as himself than the older, more bull-like man in his later years here. Or, if you will, this is how I imagine St. Thomas Aquinas more platonically...in that I hope to have expressed the gentleness, shyness, and kind innocence of his soul through his appearance. I hope that makes sense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dashinvaine [2013-01-31 01:33:57 +0000 UTC]
Dominicans? Boo!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TomQuoVadis [2013-01-30 22:13:30 +0000 UTC]
Yeeeeeees!
St. Thomas Aquinas is my confirmation saint!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nKhyi-naonZgo [2013-01-30 21:55:34 +0000 UTC]
Does anyone else think Doctor Angelicus (Latin form of Angelic Doctor) sounds like a superhero? Though, it could also mean "teacher of the angels"...but he'd be the first to tell you, angels don't learn, only material things have to interact with concepts like that. Angels just automatically know anything they're capable of knowing, as pure spirits "potential" doesn't actually have any meaning to them.
Can you tell I'm a Thomist?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
nKhyi-naonZgo In reply to nKhyi-naonZgo [2013-02-13 02:10:10 +0000 UTC]
Chesterton yes, Gilson no. I prefer Jacques Maritain and Mortimer Adler for my modern Thomism. "The Difference of Man and the Difference it Makes", by Adler, is a must-read if you're a science-fiction writer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nKhyi-naonZgo In reply to Theophilia [2013-02-13 02:11:48 +0000 UTC]
That other reply ("Chesterton yes, Gilson no") was supposed to be a reply to this one, I don't know what happened.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wachmistrz [2013-01-30 21:44:36 +0000 UTC]
Great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>