Comments: 49
Dragon-Ex [2011-09-10 21:01:32 +0000 UTC]
I never asked for this.👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePoeticPaladin In reply to Dragon-Ex [2011-09-10 23:27:29 +0000 UTC]
Had to google that to figure out what it was.
I don't really get it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragon-Ex In reply to ThePoeticPaladin [2011-09-11 04:32:12 +0000 UTC]
That was a typo. I meant to say Adam Jensen. Sorry for the confusion.
Adam Jensen: I never asked for this.
Me neither buddy. Me neither.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragon-Ex In reply to ThePoeticPaladin [2011-09-11 22:02:42 +0000 UTC]
Oh no see, I meant sad overall. It's actually quite funny for me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePoeticPaladin In reply to Dragon-Ex [2011-09-11 22:43:55 +0000 UTC]
...I still don't get it. What's it a reference to?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePoeticPaladin In reply to Dragon-Ex [2011-09-12 00:04:53 +0000 UTC]
I did. It was just some guy saying "he didn't ask for this".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragon-Ex In reply to ThePoeticPaladin [2011-09-12 02:21:36 +0000 UTC]
Wrong. It was Adam Jensen saying "I never asked for this."
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePoeticPaladin In reply to Dragon-Ex [2011-09-12 02:38:53 +0000 UTC]
Still. I don't know who he is or what he didn't ask for.
Or what it has to do with this piece.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragon-Ex In reply to ThePoeticPaladin [2011-09-12 17:25:38 +0000 UTC]
Did you think about it...at all? Cause by this point you really should have gotten my insult. Ah well. Still funny ^-^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jrakob [2011-08-11 11:40:11 +0000 UTC]
last part made me lol, and the first part . . .confound theses ponies they drive me to read psychology literature!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePoeticPaladin In reply to Jrakob [2011-08-11 11:53:07 +0000 UTC]
I wouldn't call Dunning-Kruger "literature". It's really just an observation that came about from a case study. If you want'd it as "literature", you'd probably find it in a book on cognitive bias.
I honestly have never read any complete texts on psychology (or sociology, or philosophy, for that matter). I just enjoy reading case studies here and there. I'm considering minoring in psych, out of interest. Not sure yet though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jrakob In reply to ThePoeticPaladin [2011-08-11 12:01:18 +0000 UTC]
well if you want to be a writer it would be helpful I think, to have a broader perspective on the human psyche, and studying psychology, sociology or philosophy, for that matter would certainly help, but if I had to choose any one of the three I'd choose philosophy
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Anon371 [2011-08-10 17:18:24 +0000 UTC]
Only intelligent people question their intelligence, because doing so displays an act of critical thinking.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anon371 In reply to ThePoeticPaladin [2011-08-11 15:00:18 +0000 UTC]
I have never met a moron who was aware that they were a moron, because morons are incapable of critical thinking. Down's Syndrome sufferers don't question their intelligence in the sense that they are fully aware they are retards and that there is nothing they can do about it. They never presume for a second they are smart, as morons do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePoeticPaladin In reply to Anon371 [2011-08-11 20:59:15 +0000 UTC]
Maybe you're talking to all the wrong morons then.
One of my good friends was fully aware that she was a walking blond stereotype. She over-estimated the level of her own ignorance, true. But she was certainly right: She's wildly gullible, and pretty damn uneducated. When I was around her, I relatively frequently would have to repeat myself by phrasing something differently, because she didn't understand my level of diction.
I know a couple other people that are in the same group of "knowing they aren't smart". As well as at least one person that brings this entire study into more question (for me, at least). A friend of mine got a 16 on the ACT (he later retook it and got a 19, but that means his "better" try was on par with the national average), and most of his friends made fun of it (myself included). The man was a walking stereotype, 6'8" and about 300lbs of muscle, so people (himself included) naturally assumed he was stupid. Yet despite getting an [exactly] average ACT score and being fully aware that he was stupid, he'd text me at night to ask for my interpretation of various chapters in the WoT series, and was wholly responsible for me not failing physics and having to retake my senior year.
I don't know exactly what my point is here, but I guess it can be best summarized by: "Purely questioning your own intelligence doesn't necessarily mean that you are intelligent, but refusing to question your own intelligence is certainly a mark of a lack of intelligence."
Then again, I'm a passive little bitch that refuses to speak in absolutes. So you might be right, and it's just that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Anon371 In reply to ThePoeticPaladin [2011-08-12 05:10:45 +0000 UTC]
Well, i am just making generalizations here, but I think that if there is a possibility that purely questioning your intelligence doesn't necessarily mean you are intelligent, which I will not rule out, then the sign of intelligence at that point would be looking at your own mental capabilities from a neutral, unbiased perspective in respect for others in comparison, and not allowing your ego to make you overestimate your thinking ability, allowing you to come to a statistically accurate conclusion.
But then that leads to the question of whether humility is a characteristic of rationality from a purely judgemental perspective, or a purely emotional factor which cannot be accurately measured from a non-biased point of view.
I will agree with the notion that not questioning your intelligence at all is indeed a sign of a lack of mental capability.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ThePoeticPaladin In reply to ThePoeticPaladin [2011-08-10 20:20:10 +0000 UTC]
>otherwise morons
I woke up literally less than ten minutes ago. Cut me some slack.
"even if s/he is otherwise a moron".
Also, mentally fix any "they" errors I made, because I know I made one or two.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GuruGrendo [2011-08-10 02:56:49 +0000 UTC]
tl;dr
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePoeticPaladin In reply to VanillaBeanBurst [2011-08-10 03:23:52 +0000 UTC]
I've only gotten around to submitting to two groups, actually. I don't know the right groups for this sort of thing.
Also, on an unrelated note: I was going to go out and buy something to drink, but a kitten fell asleep on me. Goddammit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePoeticPaladin In reply to VanillaBeanBurst [2011-08-10 03:33:58 +0000 UTC]
I don't like cats. But I can appreciate kittens. My mom works for an animal rescue, so I get a bit spoiled. I get to see the kittens, and then people adopt the cute little kittens before they grow up, and I'm sad for about two seconds before there are new kittens for me to look over.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AniGirl96 [2011-08-09 20:34:29 +0000 UTC]
No wonder Twi is so smart. She eats BRAIIIIIIIIIIIIINS C:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ColinMLP [2011-08-09 04:25:44 +0000 UTC]
That twist ending.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePoeticPaladin In reply to ColinMLP [2011-08-09 04:34:57 +0000 UTC]
I chose the thumbnail for this piece with care.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
laserdogbad [2011-08-09 04:25:23 +0000 UTC]
um cool i guess i mean its something to do with mlp or something. it makes sense perfectly i think
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePoeticPaladin In reply to laserdogbad [2011-08-09 04:27:20 +0000 UTC]
The only real tie to MLP is that the character writing the "letter" is an MLP character. All you need to know if you aren't a fan is that she writes a letter to "Princess Celestia" at the end of each episode.
If you read it as just a nerd writing her thoughts down for her mentor overseas, it reads exactly the same. The Dunning-Kruger effect is a real life thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0