HOME | DD

ThePpeGFX In reply to ??? [2009-11-28 02:29:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to zootfruit [2009-11-17 19:50:15 +0000 UTC]

Well I don't have anything about searching for a deeper meaning, I just wanted to illustrate what different people can think of the same thing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to Hellstick [2008-08-22 09:25:50 +0000 UTC]

Haha, thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to DaWritter [2007-09-09 19:22:45 +0000 UTC]

Agreed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to mind-twist [2007-05-20 16:27:37 +0000 UTC]

: )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to Curos [2007-05-18 10:36:24 +0000 UTC]

I bet ya do

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to AltheTurkey [2007-05-17 21:24:08 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AltheTurkey In reply to ThePpeGFX [2007-05-18 09:49:46 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to SCRaM01 [2007-05-17 18:16:25 +0000 UTC]

I'm in it for the boobs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to Skull-X [2007-05-17 15:53:41 +0000 UTC]

*bows*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to SharrkTank [2007-05-17 15:36:03 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to apilotkun [2007-05-17 15:36:15 +0000 UTC]

Quakers oatmeal can TALK?!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

apilotkun In reply to ThePpeGFX [2007-05-18 00:22:45 +0000 UTC]

depends on the type and the year

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to lityo [2007-05-17 12:04:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks as always

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lityo In reply to ThePpeGFX [2007-05-17 13:47:15 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome as always. (:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to pope151 [2007-05-17 12:02:04 +0000 UTC]

I had fun searching for the image to use as the stencil

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to solo-talent [2007-05-17 09:33:38 +0000 UTC]

Man, a genuine 'laugh out loud', it's sweet to know it did that although I didn't need to know about your wee.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

solo-talent In reply to ThePpeGFX [2007-05-17 09:44:43 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I'm still breathing irregular cause of that laugh! It really is a damn cool work!

W..w....what wee?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to triin [2007-05-17 09:32:03 +0000 UTC]

I'll take the repeated use of 'very' means you really really like it, so I thank you very very much

(see what I did there? haha)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

triin In reply to ThePpeGFX [2007-05-17 10:27:40 +0000 UTC]

smart

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to moovok [2007-05-17 09:28:29 +0000 UTC]

I'm just appreciating the female form just maybe not as eloquently.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to sevenths [2007-05-17 09:27:42 +0000 UTC]

Thanks man.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to Benzic [2007-05-17 09:27:35 +0000 UTC]

Now I wonder why...haha.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to raikuma [2007-05-17 09:27:25 +0000 UTC]

Sometimes it's the obvious reason : D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to moose-seer [2007-05-17 09:26:07 +0000 UTC]

You shouldn't be persecuted for appreciating the beauty of form. Of course it helps if you're a little more eloquent than "she's hot"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

moose-seer In reply to ThePpeGFX [2007-05-17 12:04:56 +0000 UTC]

Very true, but sometimes it can only be summed up in those exact words.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to PlanetBloopy [2007-05-17 09:24:24 +0000 UTC]

Maybe he doesn't mind the nude depiction of a lady, afterall he is a man, but he might mind his wages going elsewhere to clean up 'silly kid's vandalism'.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePpeGFX In reply to Ghoulardo [2007-05-17 09:22:42 +0000 UTC]

If anyone agreed, the world would be a boring place : D

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Ghoulardo In reply to ThePpeGFX [2007-05-18 00:22:14 +0000 UTC]

we'd be all teh robotzorz man 0_o

👍: 0 ⏩: 0