HOME | DD

toxic-nebulae — Fidelia

Published: 2011-07-18 18:40:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 623; Favourites: 9; Downloads: 17
Redirect to original
Description (mother)
Fidelia
Wife of
Calvin W. Rose
Died
Jan 17, 1876
Aged 73 yrs.

picture by ~HeWhoHoldsNoName
Related content
Comments: 21

Mr-Chaotic-Artist [2011-08-06 18:48:36 +0000 UTC]

Darling, thou beist devine in beauty. How elegant is thyne nature? Thyne elegance overwhelms all!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

toxic-nebulae In reply to Mr-Chaotic-Artist [2011-08-07 05:01:51 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

vespera [2011-08-01 03:56:11 +0000 UTC]

lovely

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

toxic-nebulae In reply to vespera [2011-08-01 15:27:52 +0000 UTC]

thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bruja-JackParawas [2011-07-31 04:36:25 +0000 UTC]

Ooooh! I love the dress *w*
good photo!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

toxic-nebulae In reply to Bruja-JackParawas [2011-07-31 14:50:20 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lovespoon [2011-07-20 16:25:17 +0000 UTC]

Edwardian clothing??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

toxic-nebulae In reply to Lovespoon [2011-07-20 17:13:02 +0000 UTC]

of course.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lovespoon In reply to toxic-nebulae [2011-07-20 17:26:14 +0000 UTC]

Why do you like about Edwardian era?
Was this something you were studying in school?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

toxic-nebulae In reply to Lovespoon [2011-07-20 17:49:55 +0000 UTC]

the Victorian era is my favourite, because it was when scientific thinking really started up. the Edwardian era, to me, is a continuation of this process.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lovespoon In reply to toxic-nebulae [2011-07-21 18:32:01 +0000 UTC]

That's a fine thing for a pretty girl
to admire. Science and clothes.

They wore so many clothes in those days.




👍: 0 ⏩: 1

toxic-nebulae In reply to Lovespoon [2011-07-21 20:24:46 +0000 UTC]

pretty clothes, but extremely restrictive for women.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lovespoon In reply to toxic-nebulae [2011-07-21 21:55:47 +0000 UTC]

You and your minder photographer like them
for some reason. lol


👍: 0 ⏩: 2

HeWhoHoldsNoName In reply to Lovespoon [2011-07-25 16:55:26 +0000 UTC]

I'm not her minder. She has no need for one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

toxic-nebulae In reply to Lovespoon [2011-07-21 23:40:44 +0000 UTC]

this is obviously a modernised version without all of the corsetting and petticoats and cages and wires and shit. it's just pretty.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lovespoon In reply to toxic-nebulae [2011-07-22 00:48:10 +0000 UTC]

lol you sound downright depressed.

I think they made women wear all that stuff
to control their sexual desires. Hard to
get very hot and bothered in all those clothes.

I do notice quite a few petticoats in your
modern version.


👍: 0 ⏩: 1

toxic-nebulae In reply to Lovespoon [2011-07-22 01:51:28 +0000 UTC]

just one. and it was showing. >.<

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lovespoon In reply to toxic-nebulae [2011-07-22 14:14:31 +0000 UTC]



Isn't that scandalious?


👍: 0 ⏩: 1

toxic-nebulae In reply to Lovespoon [2011-07-22 15:36:31 +0000 UTC]

I'm nothing if not a rule-breaker.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lovespoon In reply to toxic-nebulae [2011-07-22 19:44:26 +0000 UTC]

You're a bad girl.

That's okay though. You like science.
Though you don't write about science.

You can tell me all about the Edwarding age.
Sounds like this was before Victorian age.

:love;

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HeWhoHoldsNoName In reply to Lovespoon [2011-07-25 16:57:49 +0000 UTC]

The Edwardian era was after the Victorian era.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0