HOME | DD

Trecathlus β€” The Autobot Hierarchy

Published: 2008-09-21 02:07:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 105919; Favourites: 561; Downloads: 2391
Redirect to original
Description

THE AUTOBOT HIERARCHY
As of December 14, 2021

This is my idea of a military-style explanatory organizational Autobot chart. It includes every Autobot that made an appearance in the G1 cartoon series and I've done my best to find a logical spot for everyone. It's quite comprehensive, as the sheer number of extant Autobot characters would properly seem to demand. Most recently, my inter-character scaling finally seems to be falling into place, which needed to be reflected here as well. I'm also starting to understand better how light would affect these avatars if they were three-dimensional and have started to apply that insight to the shading. Some of the characters have been updated as such and more is to come.

ORGANIZATION

I've arranged characters within each division according to the general area of expertise they bring to the fold. The TACTICAL DIVISION subtitle, for example, hints at the sequence of abilities I like to sort them by. However, the need to fit everyone and keep certain sub-groupings natural does make for the odd exception.

CLARIFICATIONS

I've received some surprisingly critical remarks about the piece, so I want to enlighten visitors about the conditions I apply to my choice of arrangement and labeling. The primary condition: My work in general is based on the U.S. G1 continuity as shown in the original 1980s TV series. I usually consider any retroactive references added to later franchises, such as BEAST MACHINES and ROBOTS IN DISGUISE, beyond the purview of my output and consequently beside the point. If a BEAST MACHINES toy tech spec suggests the purpose of an obscure one-off G1 character was such and such, I disregard it because the original episode(s) didn't mention or display it. If an episode of ROBOTS IN DISGUISE says DION became ULTRA MAGNUS (a confirmed nod to a favourite fan theory incorporated into translated dialogue for an imported Japanese TV series, no less), I discount it because the original WAR DAWN episode ultimately left his fate unknown.

I've made a single exception to the rule, but I'll get to that a bit later.

Now, in rendering these avatars, I've relied upon the following three sources:

VISUAL REPRESENTATION: THE U.S. G1 TV SERIES (and a little bit of the comic book)

The TV series represents 95% of my visual references. In the few cases where a character's cartoon series representation is too limited to be used, I've drawn on THE TRANSFORMERS: UNIVERSE or appearances from the original comic book. I would've preferred all of my references to be intrinsic to the TV show, but I've accepted this source as the finalized character models were used for all of the G1 media permutations.

FUNCTIONS AND TITLES: THE TRANSFORMERS: UNIVERSE

THE TRANSFORMERS: UNIVERSE forms the basis of both the original comic book and TV series characters and the latter medium, though it tends to be less concretely stated, follows the functions and titles in the former. That's how I'm able to determine, for example, that TAILGATE is a scout and TANTRUM is a fueler.

FUNCTIONS AND TITLES: TOY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

A time or two, a character was on the show but received no TRANSFORMERS: UNIVERSE profile. For their functions, I consulted their toy tech specs. That way, to name one, I could tell SWERVE was a metallurgist.


SINGULAR SERIES-ONLY CHARACTERS

So what of one-off characters that were neither made into toys nor featured in contemporaneous media?

Sometimes all there is to base functions on is the dialogue and action taking place in a character's episode. In some cases, obscure characters are mentioned and even enlarged upon in official latter-day media, but given my isolated frame of reference, I almost always ignore those backdated depictions, which are often made simply to appeal to fans with whom they originate. To reiterate my earlier point: If an IDW comic book were to claim that DEVCON used to be a Cybertronian mailman, it has no bearing on the way I choose to present the character, simply because it never came up in THE GAMBLER. But I've made one concession:

Because I like their look, I wanted to include the unnamed female Autobots from THE SEARCH FOR ALPHA TRION, but I hesitated because I didn't particularly want to use the names Jesse Wittenrich gave them for the 2010 FLAMES OF YESTERDAY online exclusive comic book. They're not bad, even if I don't see the "Auto-significance" of LANCER, but I was long adamant that I would only accept names made up by Beth Bornstein or others who worked on the original show. In the end, I decided to relent with these two and these two alone. I also accepted their functions as scientists, as they looked analytically involved with their Cybertron base. I did adjust one of their purposes to avoid duplication, but kept it in the realm of science.

Speaking of duplication: Some have also commented on the existence of both ARIEL and ELITA ONE in the chart, or both ORION PAX and OPTIMUS PRIME, to name a couple (or actually two couples). "Why are they both in there? They're the same character." I understand the question. But: They were very different types from one form to another and their old lives were "astro-years" apart from what they became. They were inconsequential entities with greatness in their futures. And it would be a waste not to show their designs!

Finally, the overview includes two "cheats" on my part. I've always felt the lack of robot modes for HAULER and SLAMMER. It just looks too odd having vehicular-mode avatars next to everyone else's proper face. So I decided to design heads for each of them and put them in there instead of their respective crane and tank modes.

I welcome anyone to disagree with my structuring and classification of the characters, but again, within the confines of the original 1980s U.S. G1 universe, this is as true an illustration as I can -- and will -- ever make.

That is all -- thank you!

Related content
Comments: 158

Trecathlus In reply to ??? [2024-09-27 06:51:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Trecathlus [2024-02-26 06:56:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JazzKirby [2024-02-23 11:41:39 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CreepyUncleTony [2023-07-17 06:10:31 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to CreepyUncleTony [2023-07-22 00:14:29 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreepyUncleTony In reply to Trecathlus [2023-07-24 04:32:56 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CreepyUncleTony [2023-07-17 06:05:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to CreepyUncleTony [2023-07-22 00:13:22 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

spockofvulcan123 [2022-03-16 04:22:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to spockofvulcan123 [2022-04-13 16:15:06 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

spockofvulcan123 In reply to Trecathlus [2022-04-13 19:46:07 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Gagnl [2021-07-16 03:52:45 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to Gagnl [2021-08-03 08:15:46 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Gagnl In reply to Trecathlus [2021-08-08 02:19:05 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sonicspeedster92 [2021-03-02 23:18:58 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to sonicspeedster92 [2021-03-02 23:30:06 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sonicspeedster92 In reply to Trecathlus [2021-03-02 23:46:49 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Reaper1998 [2021-02-26 19:59:01 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to Reaper1998 [2021-02-28 01:11:28 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Reaper1998 In reply to Trecathlus [2021-02-28 03:27:05 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

supermanfan01 [2012-04-29 09:55:24 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


Makes sense based on the cartoon. How long did this take you, because it looks like a lot of hard work went into this.

Personally, I don't really like the idea of an Autobot hierarchy, because, seeing as how their a force for freedom, I personally think they would rather have elected leaders, with Optimus Prime being the military general. If they are shown as being an army, then maybe a ranks system makes sense. But, as a faction, even in the original cartoon, Cybertron is shown to have civilians on it, most of who are Autobots, so in that case, you might want to think about what the Autobots stand for

Other than that, I don't really see anything wrong. The designs are true to the original, the divisions are clear, and the order seems about right. Hope this helps

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Cylinder-the-Autobot [2011-03-13 05:37:41 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


This is really cool! I love the whole idea of of hierarchy, it's definitely original. I've never seen this before. e.deviantart.net/emoticons/s/s… " width="15" height="15" alt="" title=" (Smile)"/> How long did this take you? It looks like it took a while.... Every Autobot's job totally makes me think of them (and I agree with their occupation choice). Seeing this makes me extremely want to watch all of the episodes again! *goes to tv*.

Honestly, I can't find anything to actually criticize... it's all too awesome! Maybe the medics could be separated form the science division?? What about giving a medic to the Airealbots, Protectobots, etc.?

Above all, this is very wonderful work!!!!! e.deviantart.net/emoticons/b/b… " width="15" height="15" alt="" title=" (Big Grin)"/> You did a very nice job! I'm being sarcastic here, but maybe you could make one for comics, or OC's from around da? <---- Just kidding. Very nice job, and keep up the great work!

~CTA

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to Cylinder-the-Autobot [2011-03-15 18:50:46 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

When I orignally did this, all the icons were pretty much ready to insert into this piece and its Decepticon companion, so what primarly took time was the planning -- how to divide them into groups, what groups to feature, how to align them so that there would be symmetry (which I always like to have), and how to make everything compositionally appealing and logical. I guess I spent a week thinking about it in-between my everyday activities before I implemented the arrangement.

I'm glad you enjoyed it enough to critique it -- I always dig reading comments and this is one of the most uplifting I've ever received.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

SilverStoneKennels In reply to Trecathlus [2017-09-15 11:36:03 +0000 UTC]

I like how you did the older transformers :3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to SilverStoneKennels [2017-09-20 10:23:37 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much, SilverStoneKennels. Always nice to hear a kind word.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverStoneKennels In reply to Trecathlus [2018-05-05 09:54:37 +0000 UTC]

Ah yes, you're welcome. I had quit DeviantArt for a while. Sorry for the late reply.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Cylinder-the-Autobot In reply to Trecathlus [2011-03-16 00:32:27 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome! Keep up the great work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lilly-Wind [2019-07-11 22:22:14 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to Lilly-Wind [2019-07-14 22:05:45 +0000 UTC]

My thanks for your sweet comment, Lilly-Wind. It doth warm the cockles.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RefilGames12 [2019-05-12 00:10:05 +0000 UTC]

nice bro!!! this is amazing!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to RefilGames12 [2019-06-20 13:32:23 +0000 UTC]

Muito obrigada.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Grim-Supreme [2019-03-29 16:27:49 +0000 UTC]

Love it all!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to Grim-Supreme [2019-04-08 09:09:03 +0000 UTC]

And your doing so makes it all the more satisfying. Thank you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Grim-Supreme In reply to Trecathlus [2019-04-08 12:15:39 +0000 UTC]

Welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

symbiote12345 [2019-01-21 20:50:02 +0000 UTC]

okay... HOW CAN THAT OVERRATED TWERP BUMBLEBEE RANK HIGHER THAN THE DINOBOTS!? AND THE COMBINERS!? THIS IS ALL WRONG!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to symbiote12345 [2019-01-23 16:22:18 +0000 UTC]

Hello. This chart isn't about reflecting individual rank as much as a logical (to my limited mind, at least) pseudo-militaristic structure of this particular "society."

Furthermore, I don't appreciate a lot of "shouting" about something that was made solely for enjoyment.

If your next response (should you type one) also contains ALL CAPS and aggressive language and punctuation, it will be removed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

symbiote12345 In reply to Trecathlus [2019-01-23 16:28:14 +0000 UTC]

Sorry...

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to symbiote12345 [2019-01-24 20:10:27 +0000 UTC]

That's all right. Thanks for taking what I said to heart.

Opinions are great -- as long as they're expressed in a cool manner.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

symbiote12345 In reply to Trecathlus [2019-01-24 22:15:19 +0000 UTC]

True.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

megasonicman01 [2018-07-31 13:36:48 +0000 UTC]

If I could ask? Who on this list was killed in the movie in some form (are thebstoryboards canon) or was never seen in season 3Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to megasonicman01 [2018-09-05 19:24:34 +0000 UTC]

Hi!

Pardon me for the very late answer. Summer's been going on.

The answer to your question has been well documented elsewhere on-line, but since you do ask:

DEMONSTRABLE DEATHS

Optimus Prime
Ironhide
Prowl
Ratchet
Wheeljack
Windcharger

STRONGLY INDICATED DEATHS

Brawn
Roller (a living part of Optimus Prime)

POST-CONFIRMED DEATHS

Huffer

STORYBOARDED DEATHS

Mirage
Red Alert
Smokescreen
Trailbreaker

And yes, I regard the storyboards as canonical.

NEVER SEEN AGAIN

Bluestreak
Chromia
Cliffjumper (he did survive the movie)
Devcon
Dion
Elita One
Firestar
Gears
Grapple
Hoist
Hound
Inferno
Moonracer
Sideswipe
Skids
Skyfire (unless you count his animation jet mode being used as an arbitrary Autobot Fleet ship in DARK AWAKENING)
Sunstreaker (unless you count his appearance in FIVE FACES OF DARKNESS - PART 5 coloured as BUMBLEBEE)
Tracks

And that should be it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

steve2275 [2017-10-19 22:44:36 +0000 UTC]

again well dpone

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to steve2275 [2017-10-28 19:05:05 +0000 UTC]

And again thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Vectorshot [2017-06-11 04:22:05 +0000 UTC]

This chart is cool, thanks for your time. I would love to see one with the Japanese continuity included as well. What would be cooler is all of that with them set up by not only their functions but ranks as well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to Vectorshot [2017-06-12 21:51:27 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, Vectorshot. Β 

I have considered doing a Japanese sub-gallery at some point, but it will probably be mainly HEADMASTERS-oriented.Β 
The MASTERFORCE and VICTORY designs seem more complex to me than I feel I have the skill to do very well, butΒ 
I won't rule it out.

As for rank -- do you mean the Tech Spec ranking system?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Vectorshot In reply to Trecathlus [2017-06-17 02:30:39 +0000 UTC]

Yes I do, the tech specs rankings made them seem so real when I was little. With the skills that you have I can see you pulling off the Japanese continuity. What program are you using to create the images?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to Vectorshot [2017-07-03 12:46:46 +0000 UTC]

Well, I thank you for the good word on my abilities.

I could probably do it, though it would require me to get more deeply into the Japanese series.Β 
It may be that ship's sailed, because life is a lot different with regard to getting into new thingsΒ 
like this, but I won't rule it out!

The software I've sworn to over more than two decades now is the Microangelo toolset. They
feel good enough about their product history to profile themselves as "The Grand Daddy of Icon
Software," and I can't say a thing against that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ghilz [2017-06-11 01:28:51 +0000 UTC]

"Female Division" ? That's... weird. I mean, why not "Cybertron Resistance" which is what they did on the show, resist Shockwave on Cybertron.Β 

Otherwise, good work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trecathlus In reply to Ghilz [2017-06-12 21:58:06 +0000 UTC]

Hello, Ghilz. Thanks for your feedback.

I have an answer to your question, but before I give it, I'd like to understand your point of view fully.
Could I interest you in sharing precisely why you think it so strange?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ghilz In reply to Trecathlus [2017-07-05 01:42:16 +0000 UTC]

It seems a rather arbitrary division. Everyone else is either grouped by function (Command, Science), or by Special ability (Targetmasters) or actual team name (Dinobots, Protectobots).

The "Female Division" is the only one that's divided by gender term. It's also the only major division (As opposed to those put under sub divisions) not to have subtitle the way Science, Command and Combat do, which furthers reinforce that the only notable thing is their gender. And lastly, on its own it gives an air of... segregation? "Girls go in the girl team so we avoid the cooties" kind of stuff.

Now, not gonna say it's your fault, the G1 show wasn't exactly the pinnacle of gender representation, far from it, but it does feel like there's decent alternative. They were, in the original show, the only Autobots (along with Alpha Trion) remaining on Cybertron. Hence why Cybertron Resistance I think has a better ring. It calls more attention to what they did and the role they filled than well, the fact they are all girls.

Rest of the poster is real nice though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>